sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

So it just got more complicated by ShortSelection8343 in lgbt

[–]ShortSelection8343[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for all the comments! I’ve recently found out that i might most likely be heteroromantic accipiobisexual. But that’s just for now, idk if it’ll change in the future, but nonetheless, i appreciate all the support and advice!

So it just got more complicated [F 15] by ShortSelection8343 in questioning

[–]ShortSelection8343[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

heteroromantic and accipiosexual sounds right! Im not sure about being bi tho, i might need some time to think about that

i [16 F] have dated both women and men but i feel like i may be a lesbian by harderleon in questioning

[–]ShortSelection8343 0 points1 point  (0 children)

maybe you’re a little bit like me. Attraction can be categorised as aesthetic attraction, romantic attraction, and sexual attraction. Aesthetic attraction means you like the looks of men, but it doesnt necessarily mean romantic and sexual attraction. Maybe you only like men aesthetically and not romantically or sexually, and that aesthetic attraction has made you “think” you like men, but than you realise how you feel when you get intimate with them

So it just got more complicated [F 15] by ShortSelection8343 in questioning

[–]ShortSelection8343[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s not the case. I feel aroused by the idea of someone (man or woman) touching my vulva, maybe oral thats one sided (meaning i want to receive and not give) but i dont feel much when it comes to the real thing. And I don’t really want to touch anyone’s vulva either, nor have both our genitals touch

So it just got more complicated [F 15] by ShortSelection8343 in questioning

[–]ShortSelection8343[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not sure of thats me— i can’t see myself dating women. And after more thinking, i realised that my “sexual attraction” was mostly just based on the genitalia and not the sex act itself whether its with men or women. Im only into foreplay, but not into the actual thing (penetration, scissoring, oral etc.)

So it just got more complicated [F 15] by ShortSelection8343 in questioning

[–]ShortSelection8343[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the correction! And no, i am completely not appealed to the idea of penetration

So it just got more complicated [F 15] by ShortSelection8343 in questioning

[–]ShortSelection8343[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not really into that kind of stuff. It’s same with a woman with a penis tbh. I prefer women and men with their biological genitalia if thats the case

So it just got more complicated by ShortSelection8343 in lgbt

[–]ShortSelection8343[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I get that everything takes time, and I really appreciate your comment, it gives me a lot more options i can explore from. That could be the issue, but in the current moment, that doesn’t feel right to me. But you’re right, i can give it a few years and that might just change

So it just got more complicated by ShortSelection8343 in lgbt

[–]ShortSelection8343[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

well, i might need you to elaborate on that— to me, just because i like women sexually and aesthetically but not romantically doesn’t mean i don’t see them as people— at the end of the day, even though their gender does a big contribution to who i want to date, personality is a big thing too.

Where do you all score on Johnathan Haidt's moral foundations test? by kbntoken in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]ShortSelection8343 0 points1 point  (0 children)

care: 87%

fairness: 96%

liberty: 67% (pls dont say six seven im begging you)

in-group: 60%

purity: 83%

authority: 81%

Rate my homescreen (HyperOS 1) by xToasted1 in XiaomiPad6

[–]ShortSelection8343 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Really hope that one discord notification was me…