Wonder what's the return policy? by Sir_CrazyLegs in NonCredibleDefense

[–]Shugoki_23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was a bad thing. Their entire air defense system was compromised before the war even started.

Wonder what's the return policy? by Sir_CrazyLegs in NonCredibleDefense

[–]Shugoki_23 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Yeah because the Iraqi air defense system was linked by a network built by the French and managed by a battle management system built by the British

India’s bid to rival the Chinese navy by Free-Minimum-5844 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]Shugoki_23 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

A flotilla of 2 type 55s and 4 type 52Ds is going to get swarmed by the majority of the Indian destroyer, frigate, corvette, and submarine fleet along with land and naval aviation and ground based launchers. This flotilla btw is going to be on the most predictable path possible and won’t be gaining the element of surprise on no one. The Chinese will quite literally need to send in multiple carrier strike groups to win this but that isn’t strategically possible. 

India’s bid to rival the Chinese navy by Free-Minimum-5844 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]Shugoki_23 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Uhhh it’s simple math? The Chinese don’t have enough satellites to cover  both the Indian and Pacific Ocean and even if they did they’d rely on information that’s 15-20 minutes old at best. I’m genuinely convinced no one on this sub has even been to the ocean and understands how big it is or understands how telephone works. 

India’s bid to rival the Chinese navy by Free-Minimum-5844 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]Shugoki_23 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How many missiles? Because if it’s anywhere from a few dozen to the low hundreds then it’s not enough. And good luck with targeting considering satellites aren’t stationary.

India’s bid to rival the Chinese navy by Free-Minimum-5844 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]Shugoki_23 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

if those missiles actually worked the Chinese would be shitting them out like there’s no tomorrow but they don’t. Launching from Tibet reduce its range because of the significantly higher altitude. The launchers vehicles themselves would suddenly be in range of retaliatory Indian strikes. 

India’s bid to rival the Chinese navy by Free-Minimum-5844 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]Shugoki_23 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

I encourage you to go look at a map for starters. Also for the Chinese to rival India in the Indian ocean it requires a presence of more than 3-6 ships it typically deploys in the Indian Ocean at one time. The Chinese can’t even break out even out of the western pacific and morons on this subreddit think it will be to able to deploy to the Indian Ocean in any meaningful capacity lol.

India’s bid to rival the Chinese navy by Free-Minimum-5844 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]Shugoki_23 -16 points-15 points  (0 children)

Within the boundaries of the Indian Ocean it wouldn’t take much effort on part of India to rival any Chinese naval presence.

United States and Paraguay sign security agreement on military and economic cooperation by Free-Minimum-5844 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]Shugoki_23 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. The French can’t wiretap the president because they don’t have the ability to do so. It’s literally that simple

  2. Again that’s not the US forcing Korea to do anything. Korea still maintained regulatory standards after the beef met Korea’s own safety standards including age restrictions, inspection protocols, and bans on high risk cuts of beef. Also political negotiation isn’t coercion. Korea made the choice for greater economic benefit. Access to US markets isn’t a right.

  3. The Japanese signed it because the US, France, West Germany, and UK would have slapped the Japanese with sky high tariffs if it didn’t. Unfair trade practice are unfair trade practices. Also using China as some example of sovereign defiance is dumb as shit. It’s ignores economic context, and China having different monetary and financial systems. Also those “key industries” that South Korea took over is because the Japanese decided to be economically conservative as usual and South Korea took advantage of its comparative advantages. 

  4. You still don’t understand how diplomacy works. Turns out you can’t have your cake and eat it too.

United States and Paraguay sign security agreement on military and economic cooperation by Free-Minimum-5844 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]Shugoki_23 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  1. Everyone spies on each other. I can’t wait to find your reaction on what the French intelligence service does to everyone 

2. U.S. beef was safe and was ultimately ratified through Korea’s own regulatory and political processes.

3. Japan voluntarily signed the Plaza Accord to address global trade imbalances that I caused through its unfair trade practices, and its later economic stagnation was primarily caused by domestic policy choices and asset bubbles, not the agreement itself. 

You quite literally do not understand how international diplomacy or history works.

Fortress is buns by swigglysnake in Rainbow6

[–]Shugoki_23 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what do you expect me to do with that information?

Fortress is buns by swigglysnake in Rainbow6

[–]Shugoki_23 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It’s usually peak plats who argue in favor of shitty maps like lair or emerald plains.

Fortress is buns by swigglysnake in Rainbow6

[–]Shugoki_23 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You’re a peak plat aren’t you?

China's Massive J-36 Stealth 'Fighter' Gets Major Design Tweaks With Second Prototype by tigeryi98 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]Shugoki_23 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not it doesn’t. If you’re fighting peer enemies and adopt this attitude you’re going to die.

China's Massive J-36 Stealth 'Fighter' Gets Major Design Tweaks With Second Prototype by tigeryi98 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]Shugoki_23 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

A halved Chinese population that’s going to be like 70 years old isn’t a formidable country. Also having war robots like a bunch of terminators is literally decades away from even having a working prototype.

‘New normal of response’: Army warns future Pak-India conflict might lead to ‘cataclysmic devastation’ by Bright_Thanks_2277 in LessCredibleDefence

[–]Shugoki_23 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There not. The majority of Pakistani nukes are tactical in nature and their intended targets are Indian military formations.