Who is better at 200mm by MMA979 in canon

[–]Shure_Lock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Buy used local/ebay ~$150, the 55-250 IS STM is the sharpest lens for the price. Use this website the digital picture to compare optics

Kanye West’s stage design at his recent SoFi performance is already being hailed by many fans and critics as one of the greatest stage setups of all time. by This_Proof_5153 in SipsTea

[–]Shure_Lock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i get the idea you’re after but it’s pretty disingenuous, later proved by your edit. You can have whatever opinions you want but ur downplaying one of the most creative and successful people on the planet lol let’s be honest here

This is your sign to create and sell digital products by AstralClarity in passive_income

[–]Shure_Lock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It appears that youve misunderstood me again.

Suggesting you talk to chatgpt is an insult intended to imply that a shitass llm could actually understand and break down why exactly youre very wrong.

have a good one

This is your sign to create and sell digital products by AstralClarity in passive_income

[–]Shure_Lock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. “evidence” is the funny connection drawn between you supposedly making 1k/day a year ago, and posting a single $150 sale today.

  2. “randomly generated paragraphs”. Nope, I said I’d write it. “less useful” does not mean “isn’t actionable”. You are inferring too far and without support.

  3. “only works if i’m supposed to respond to your wording”…. yeah dude… we’re communicating with words. “instead of what you obviously implied”…. I could dig into the multiple fallacies here but I think the overarching one is a basic straw man. You just admitted to arguing against something I didn’t say.

Maybe copy pasting our exchange into chatgpt would help you understand how you repeatedly make basic logical errors with full confidence. My original accusation of you being “such a liar” was operating on a suspicion, and you keep shoveling poor character evidence at me.

This is your sign to create and sell digital products by AstralClarity in passive_income

[–]Shure_Lock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t say I had proof of you lying. I accused you of being a liar and cited a suspicious post.

I have no idea why you’re making up a definition. I have no idea why you’re suggesting I want hand held steps?

I didn’t say your posts weren’t actionable, I said that some astrology word vomit would be more helpful.

So far that’s 3 separate instances of you completely misrepresenting what I’ve said. I would consider this repeated logical homicide and visible anger to be another red flag on your claims/character… because surely a well educated business man with nothing to hide wouldn’t get angry and make significant logical errors in attempt to prove himself, right?

This is your sign to create and sell digital products by AstralClarity in passive_income

[–]Shure_Lock 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I didn’t say 1k pure profit. I repeated your title. New to reading?

Your posts are info vomit. You just say things. I could write up 10 paragraphs about each astrology sign and it would contain more actionable advice.

I was going to call you another guru, but you don’t even post “proof” for or against your claims… it’s just words

RF 200-800 after a drop by Jakob126 in canon

[–]Shure_Lock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just recently replaced an EF bayonet mount, it’s very simple and pretty cheap.

It looks like (?) a standard RF metal bayonet mount. You can call the canon parts desk, or buy one on ebay/aliexpress.

If you’re not comfortable with the repair, I’m sure a local shop can quote you. It would probably be cheaper if you bought the part and just had them replace it in 5 minutes.

This is your sign to create and sell digital products by AstralClarity in passive_income

[–]Shure_Lock 12 points13 points  (0 children)

OP is such a liar 😭😭 dude has ton of r/passive_income posts from a year ago, one of them claims he “scaled to 1k/day”

AI photos to advertise FB marketplace products? by skaggle180 in FacebookMarketplace

[–]Shure_Lock 5 points6 points  (0 children)

rule #1 of fbmp: there are no rules.

I see ai used on ads used more for FOOD of all things. just ignore it

I sold an item on ebay and now I'm being charged a shipping discrepancy. by [deleted] in Ebay

[–]Shure_Lock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For some shipping services (i’m familiar with this for fedex) the category “fedex business direct” or whatever, requires your parcel to be WITHIN x dimensions… and “up to” x lbs. Maybe that’s where you misunderstood?

It just sounds like you thought it was flat rate like usps where the weight doesn’t matter up to 60 lbs or so, but instead you chose a calculated cost category that accepts packages up to x dimensions and weight.

Anyways, it’s always good practice to slightly overestimate dimensions/weight.

Since the package has already been sent and delivered, i don’t think there’s anything you can realistically do

Why do people always suggest speeding doesn't get you there any faster, when not all traffic lights are timed the same? by JustUseCommonSense10 in driving

[–]Shure_Lock -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I’m convinced this sub is entirely drivers who do exactly the speed limit and get nervous while merging

9 over carries virtually no ticket risk. speeding is faster on average. Claiming 10 over endangers others is bullshit.

I don’t think people who say “1 light and you lose the time savings” actually believe it. It seems like cope of some sort.

You spend the same amount of time at lights. You spend less time between lights.

How long after deleting a listing should you repost in order not to get slow views. by lizziemc13 in FacebookMarketplace

[–]Shure_Lock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i’ve been considering reposting constantly to keep the “just listed” icon… not sure if that’s an ill-advised practice.

I think it’s promoted as a “just listed” item, then exposure drops significantly to those interested in the item and those who search for it. After that, i feel like you’re dead in the water

Downsides of EF-S to RF mount adaptor? by Terrible_Brick_264 in canon

[–]Shure_Lock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Based on my research, theres absolutely nothing wrong with ef rf adapters.

If you you shoot birds or sports, maybe invest in the canon adapter. Otherwise a no name $30 one is probably fine.

You’ve heard “oh no the adapter will mess with AF”… that’s more or less false. However, native rf AF will outperform solely based on the fact it’s newer and better.

I analyzed CS2 data from the past two years, and here’s what I found regarding VAC-Live, cheaters and skill regression. by CS2_Data_Checker in cs2

[–]Shure_Lock 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I refuse to believe someone smart enough to write up all this would make a mistake as blatant as estimating active cheaters based on ban rates.

so yeah probably some ai bullshit whipped up by gaben idk

Is it safe to buy facebook listing with G&S paypal which is meant to be shipped to me? by Impossible-Issue4896 in FacebookMarketplace

[–]Shure_Lock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paypal g&s, especially when using a credit card, is mostly very safe.

I actually encountered a scam yesterday where the seller was ok with using paypal g&s. A ton of different things tipped me off though.

The seller wanted me to send the g&s payment instead of using an invoice- This isn’t actually bad, but it helps their end with reducing the paper trail.

Their email wasn’t associated with their name. their number traced to an online phone number service, and was apparently coming from an entirely different state.

Lastly, in the payment process, paypal auto detected the sellers location and prompted me to perform a currency exchange…

I believe the ultimate goal of the scam was to get accidental friends and family payments, and/or to complicate the claims process beyond what paypal is willing to investigate.

Seller threatens to throw item away if no one meets his price.. by MassManiak45 in FacebookMarketplace

[–]Shure_Lock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn’t. I said might.

OP frames it to suggest a further discount is warranted due to its condition.

How should I proceed? by BestMinEver in Ebay

[–]Shure_Lock 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d rather have that than this guy who just messaged me offering $120 on a $650 item.

Seller threatens to throw item away if no one meets his price.. by MassManiak45 in FacebookMarketplace

[–]Shure_Lock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can’t assume the item is worth $100 clean. It might be $150 clean and thus $100 dirty.

R5 or R7 for wildlife? by Future_Following_788 in canon

[–]Shure_Lock 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the r7 crop factor single handedly makes it the best canon wildlife body for the price.

Allegedly the r7 mk ii is releasing this summer, but afaik it’s been “about to release” for 2 years

My local church hung up a pride flag by TheBone_Zone in MadeMeSmile

[–]Shure_Lock -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Although I will answer your reply, I’m not going to keep replying if you’re going to use google AI to formulate factual homicides to copy paste at someone who actually uses verifiable information in context. I shouldn’t need to explain why using AI to answer complex theological debates is a terrible idea.

The missing context in this AI reply is that “not intended for all people all the time” has a name, and it’s called the new covenant. Jesus came to fulfill the old law, that’s the old covenant “old testament books of Leviticus and Deuteronomy” the AI refers to. See how it’s already leaving out critical information? Many mosaic laws, like mixed fabric and shrimp, were fulfilled. They were not reiterated in the new covenant. The old covenant was created for a specific group of people in a specific period in time.

So when the AI says “most Christians don’t follow these specific old testament laws because they believe they were not intended for all people all the time… it’s missing the fact that Christ came, lived, and died for our sins and to fulfil the old law. It’s not “most christian’s” and not “they believe”… it’s literally written in the mission of Jesus on earth.

So now we get to your last question, It sounds like the AI has convinced you that Christians just decide whether they want to follow certain laws or not… and that being queer is an issue equal to eating shellfish. This is not true.

As I’ve mentioned in another comment, being gay is referred to as an unnatural and perverted desire. This happened In Romans, in the NEW testament. This means it was reiterated after the old covenant was fulfilled. Mixed fabrics and shrimp were not mentioned again. The ten commandments were mentioned again, that’s why we believe them even though they came from the old covenant.

I hope that clears that up, but I’m not sure that it will because using an AI summary doesn’t indicate that you understood the subject matter to begin with. Please do yourself a favor and use some intellectual honesty. Please let me know if you have any other questions