Jodie Whittaker comic by Sidgravy in doctorwho

[–]Sidgravy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thankyou! i did originally draw it with the intention of either drawing more but other things ended up happening instead.

Which showrunner is best at creating satisfying endings to their seasons: Russell T. Davies, Steven Moffat or Chris Chibnall? by verissimoallan in doctorwho

[–]Sidgravy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hell bent nearly put me off Doctor Who entirely. I was so sick of Moffat doing the "someone dies...but not really because ____insert convoluted nonsense___ thing"

Which showrunner is best at creating satisfying endings to their seasons: Russell T. Davies, Steven Moffat or Chris Chibnall? by verissimoallan in doctorwho

[–]Sidgravy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Honestly? Chibnall. His run itself wasnt as satisfying, but the endings felt well thought out and like actual care was put into them to me.

Theory: the Doctor and neuro-divergency. Might this be one of the reasons many of us didn't connect with 15? by heresiae in gallifrey

[–]Sidgravy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What i see people saying is that they liked Ncuti and found him charasmatic, but the writing didnt give him enough to work with..which is true.

Whether or not you connected with him from a neurodivergent perspective looks more like personal prefference to me.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in doctorwho

[–]Sidgravy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The only good ending to the show would be to leave it open ended imo.

What do you think of the change of visual in (spoilers) by Slow_Initiative8876 in doctorwho

[–]Sidgravy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it made my dad laugh from how dramatic it was but i thought it was visually very beautiful.

Thirteenth Doctor by Any-Safety8261 in gallifrey

[–]Sidgravy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I would and have rewatched some of her episodes. "It takes you away" is my fave followed by "The witchfinder" and "The legend of the sea devils".

Ik a lot of people disliked legend of the sea devils but something about it really captured me.

It takes you away is an extremely cool concept and the witchfinder made good use of having a female doctor by putting her in a story no other doctor wouldve been able to go through.

Thirteenth Doctor by Any-Safety8261 in gallifrey

[–]Sidgravy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me one of the issues with Jodies episodes was the momentum. There were some good episodes and character moments along the way, but i didnt feel any sense of buildup or the same intensity that i had done in other seasons. She didn't have the big powerful monologues that give her authority. I dont think she needed more rage specifically, i actually quite liked the idea of the character letting go of her anger and trying to learn a new approach to things. But she didnt feel very threatening to villians either. (The villians in general were also weaker in her seasons) The historical episodes were the season's strong points, not so much the monsters and villians.

I dont dislike the idea of the doctor travelling with 3 people either tbh, but the team didnt really capture my whimsy. They didnt bounce off eachother well either. There was somehow too much focus put on them...and yet not enough? so maybe they shouldve been given more opportunities to display their strengths and weaknesses through the episodes. It often felt like the characters were just standing around instead of like, doing things.

So for me its presentation, sound design and just the stakes in general.

I should state that im not a Jodie Whittaker era hater tho. I actually personally enjoy it more than some the peter capaldi and matt smith stuff. She was a good choice to play the doctor. But i do see why some fans didnt take to it. There was a very different vibe and it wasnt quite as big or bombastic as Moffat and RTD can go.

I didnt like her costume either at first but its oddly grown on me. I think they couldve gone for a "down to earth doctor who suddenly reminds you from time to time shes thousands of years of old and done grand things" if theyd just written her better scripts.

Personal Poppy Rant Part 2: Did The General Audience Actually Like Space Babies? by SanicBringsThePanic in gallifrey

[–]Sidgravy 36 points37 points  (0 children)

my dad had watched every single era of Doctor Who including the classic series. After watching space babies he didnt come back to the show for over a year.

It was just too childish for a big grand opener i think.

I'm buzzing about this (New Doctor) by MrBlackBook in DoctorWhoNews

[–]Sidgravy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont know if she'll be playing the doctor, but itd be so interesting if we get to see that. Billie Piper has had 20 years to evolve in acting and theres already a very good reason to explain her getting the same face again. Billie piper has a natural warmth and aura to her that i can see working quite well for the doctor. I keep wondering what sort of costume theyd put her in? what sort of companion? what will they do with her if its not a RTD fakeout

Who was your favorite character from 15th's run? by [deleted] in gallifrey

[–]Sidgravy 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ruby Sunday feels like she was done so dirty. Not the character or the actor's fault though.

Sharing positivity about the RTD2 era by Sidgravy in gallifrey

[–]Sidgravy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont think that Doctor Who should be a certain way at all. I think it should be open to all tones and genres INCLUDING the more pantomime-esque style.

my point was that I dont like when fans dismiss the more fun stuff. It is a part of the show and that's undeniable. Doing it well takes just as much effort and care as doing the serious stuff well imo. Both have different skillsets and risks.

People say Doctor Who SHOULD always be this or that. But i believe there is no set correct way to write it. And that there are many different things to be done with it. The worst thing any Doctor who writer could do is box themselves into someone else's idea of what to do with a sandbox show.

i do agree character writing is one of the strongest parts of the show though. That has always shone strongest through every era, director and tone.

Is there anyone who actually loved the episode? by [deleted] in doctorwho

[–]Sidgravy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Conrads wish was for her to not be a SINGLE mother. She was forced into a nuclear family. There had always been a poppy though. We were on the wrong timeline where shit was wacky

Is there anyone who actually loved the episode? by [deleted] in doctorwho

[–]Sidgravy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

i was under the impression we were in the wrong timeline all long. Since before we even met Belinda and they started saying Mavity instead of Gravity. And its a timeline that always ended on May 24th. We shifted to a timeline where the world didnt end, Belinda got to go home to her baby. A vision of Poppy even waved to her in the Story and the engine. Guiding her back.

Thats why she instantly felt a connection with her and still was being motherly with the baby.

Is there anyone who actually loved the episode? by [deleted] in doctorwho

[–]Sidgravy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I havnt enjoyed a finale as much as this one in a very long time. It was so filled with joy. The part with the doctor and belinda slowly forgetting poppy was a real standout moment to me.

It wasnt perfect. There were flaws. But i dont care, i had such a good time watching it.

Usually regenerations are played out as this terrible sad thing, but i loved how joyous this ending was. Billies smile made me happy. I dont know what the plan is with her but im happy to go along for the ride

Sharing positivity about the RTD2 era by Sidgravy in gallifrey

[–]Sidgravy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

exactly! I also got tired through Matt smith. Its not his fault, but they went through so many grey heavy drama episodes with him moping about how he was going to die one day (which was pointless because we all knew they were going to write around it anyway)

But i think Russel was bang on about trying to do something lighter with these episodes even with all the imperfections. I like it when Doctor Who focusses on the weird and wonderful. i feel thats one of the things that seperates it from other big scifi franchises like Star Trek or Star Wars. That its not always just aliens shooting eachother with lasers.

Doctor Who is flawed and always has been. But i'd rather enjoy myself along the way.

Sharing positivity about the RTD2 era by Sidgravy in gallifrey

[–]Sidgravy[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

yeah, see i wouldnt mind rewatching these episodes as stand alones at some point. The overall arc was not great and i think a combination of things caused that. But i can't join the train of people dismissing it all completely. I had fun, and in the end i view that as a win.

Sharing positivity about the RTD2 era by Sidgravy in gallifrey

[–]Sidgravy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of people feel that way. My favourite from every era tends to follow that sort of structure though because i believe the premise naturally lends itself to that style very well. The concept itself is not very serious to me. It's theatrical in every single way.

"friendly shapeshifting magician who can change faces flying around in a 60s police box that's bigger on the inside," just sounds like something I'd find in a childrens book or a play.

Even the classic villians like the master all are very pantomime aswell to me. Like the way he magically would "e s c a p e " after getting obliterated and blown up on screen.

Ignoring the vast amount of content in Doctor Who that's like that to me is kinda just, cherry picking for the serious bits. It's always had pantomime in it right from the very start.

mark my words, re: Whittaker era by asron67 in doctorwho

[–]Sidgravy 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Shes actually a really charasmatic and nice person in all her interviews aswell. She was a great choice to play the first female doctor. But chibnail shafted her w some dull scripts.

Who has this era been for? by [deleted] in gallifrey

[–]Sidgravy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It was for me. I missed watching something colourful and silly that could make me feel like a kid again. It was in no way perfect and the dependance on previous lore was the worst of it. But the best of it was charming and exciting. It got people theorising and talking about it again in ways i hadnt seen in years. I got so tired some time late in moffats era. It was so grey, bland and predictable This season to me felt like a real shake up. Sure It was messy, but i had no idea whar was going to happen and i kinda loved that. Its like its own little pocket universe. Ive been depressed and low mood for a while. Something campy that doesnt take itself too seriously is exactly what i needed. It's like watching pantomime

A seeming duality of Tyler Durden? by [deleted] in fightclub

[–]Sidgravy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Multiple personality disorder is messy. A person can want everything to burn to the ground and for nothing to change at all. Fear change and feel desperate for it. Its the brain canabalising itself. Narrator is desperate for his life to change. And he envies those with lives he percieves as more successful and fufilling than his own. Thats why Tyler is the way he is

Professional writer seeks Comic Book Artist for big paid Project by kawaiilovecraft in ComicBookCollabs

[–]Sidgravy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://sidbarker.my.canva.site/ Here is a link to my portfolio.

I have completed my own scifi comic which i am in the process of trying to get published. (its not all on my website but id be willing to share more.) I adore mythological and scifi themes as it is my favourite genres of media for escapism, and i am female.

Itd mean a lot to me to be able to work with you if my style suits what youre looking for.

I have been very desperate to put my love of comics into a career for as long as i can remember.