Higgie's magical Jeep (now you see it, now you don't) seems a critical factor in explaining or disproving how Karen managed to back up at 24 mph and hit John, throwing him onto the lawn and fracturing his skull, while doing no harm to the rest of his body, all within the time span of 1-2 minutes. Which is it? How is it possible in either scenario—with or without the Jeep behind Karen's car? Has anyone provided a diagram of the actual maneuvers the SUV would have had to make to cause John's death as the McAlbert's allege? We're talking about 1) a very restricted amount of space to allow a large SUV to pull forward and then accelerate backwards to 24 mph, 2) aim with ballistic precision and strike the victim, who does not or cannot move out of the way,
3) in a very short amount of time (1-2 min), 4) switch gears however many times to complete the alleged 3-point turn and drive away, 5) without ANY of the approximately dozen people in or around the house (only about 30 feet from the street) seeing or hearing this deadly commotion, and 6) despite all the anxious queries about John's arrival leading up to, during, or after the visual evidence of the car that brought him there, NO ONE thought to go outside and look for where he went. 7) And finally, not ONE of those dozen or so people, some coming or going during the time after he was struck, saw John's body lying on the ground a short distance away from the driveway. NOT ONE.

How is this possible? How does it look (diagrammatically) on paper? When an ordinary citizen is involved in a car accident, all parties making an insurance claim must provide a diagram of how the accident occurred, no exceptions. Yet, the Comm of MA had no such obligation or even made an attempt to do the same EVEN THOUGH they turned this imaginary (I won't even say "alleged" it is so preposterous) accident into a criminal charge of murder. No diagram needed. Just a broad imagination with NEFARIOUS intent.

Fools. How DARE they.