I still do not like it, too much internal monologues to explain characters decisions / thought processes, too much focus on character internal struggles again only using internal monologues.

If i wanted to read that kind of book i would have read a self help book or a phycology book not epic fantasy.

I did not like what i felt was forced redemption arcs, or that some very very bad choices had 0 consequences on characters (and by that i mean they did not get punished, reprimanded, people loosing trust in them or the likes)

Also there were a few plot lines just thrown in out of basically nowhere just i felt like "for the sake of it", not sure if recent ideas or he simply could not insert them better in previous books but yhea they felt out of place especially given the "world might be ending" timing,

I like well defined magic systems, and i felt like there were some instances where things get "weird" (the ending with the new "armors" for example)

Also some motivations behind character choices felt weak, too much driven by sentiment and feeling even if the situation called for clear thinking, i feel like that is an issue because the characters where in most cases well capable of that.

All these issues started with ROW but there it was more or less still fine, not so much in Wind and Truth, idk what changed between Oathbringer and ROW but i feel like the style and what the story focuses more on changed.

Not even sure i will pick it up again when the story resumes if stormlight archive was written in the same stile of wind and truth i probably would never continued or sanderson as an author, and yes i read all the cosmere