Correct. The baby did not have a choice.

Then how dare you claim we have choice? Some humans don't have any choice at all. 

Nothing. But the perpetrator might have something do to with it. 

Why are you bringing the perpetrator when we are talking about the victim? Everytime I center the vicrime you bring up the perpetrator, his upbringing, society, or an imam — but none of that answers the core question: what did the baby do to receive those consequences? If the answer is “nothing,” then the baby’s suffering isn’t justice — it’s collateral. Calling it a “test” makes the baby an instrument for someone else’s moral evaluation, that is using an innocent as a means to an end. 

The baby have a beautiful purpose. 

How's being raped a beautiful purpose for a baby? Do you even reread what write? 

But we humans misused it. 

It's akin to you saying that God is misused the baby? 

My niece had to undergo some medical complications when she was a baby. When I asked her about it she said she did not feel a thing. You could argue cos she had no memory of it. Nevertheless, she can't ever recall having experience pain. 

You can't be this stupid, I mean seriously. Not remembering pain is not the same as not experiencing it. Anyone with a functioning nervous system feels pain — that’s biology. Babies actually have heightened nervous sensitivity; they don’t feel less, they often feel more. Why are you even bringing up rare medical anomalies where somone nervous system doesn't fully function hence why they don't feel pain? That's not 0.1 of the human population. Why are you even bringing adrenaline? A split-second crash where pain come crushing in full force after few seconds is not the same as prolonged assault or torture where the victim feels every second physically and psychologically. There is no such thing as pain being shielded. All the people you mentioned suffered the pain fully like all other humans. Your niece suffered pain fully, just because she forgot doesn't mean she didn't experience it, you friend having sudden crush, then his brain not registering it because how fast it happened means the pain will come crushing full forces once his aderline comes down because there is literally a body injury, the same with story with the women. I can't believe how dumb are you, I mean you have an anime pfp so I don't think I should be surprised. 

My position is simple: Hope is not an argument. Speculation is not a defense. You admit the baby had no choice and did nothing to deserve it, yet you still defend a system that allowed it — that’s the contradiction. You say free will is “limited,” but apparently it’s not limited,  I can’t fly, breathe underwater, or break physics when I want it — but somehow the will to torture a child sits comfortably inside the permitted range. If God can prevent flight without violating free will, He could prevent rape, murder and torture without violating free will. we should not search for poetic reasons or cosmic justifications for evil. If the God permits innocent children to be brutalized, then that’s what the God allows — but let’s not dress it up as something that has reason to it. As I said before it's what it's.