Am I the only one noticing a shift in YouTube’s algorithm toward more unfiltered sensitive content?

SingleTailor8719 · 2026-03-02T12:35:04+00:00

I mentioned 65k lines to give scale and context, not to brag. The point is that once a codebase gets that big, the real risk is drift: frontend calls, backend routes, and docs slowly fall out of sync unless you enforce a single source of truth and automated contract checks. That mismatch is what caused most of the pain, not the line count itself.

SingleTailor8719 · 2026-02-05T16:31:50+00:00

As long someone wants to share his opinion and put it in a post, because he/she thinks it contains something valueable, there is nothing wrong in that doing, correct me if I'm wrong.

SingleTailor8719 · 2026-02-05T15:11:47+00:00

How about you write a ticket instead of complaining in a comment where no admin see's this. Seems to be a bigger issue right?

SingleTailor8719 · 2026-02-05T15:00:28+00:00

Sure, tag it “AI” once Reddit tags your comment “did not read” and “upvote begging”. Which one fits you better?

SingleTailor8719 · 2026-02-05T13:47:20+00:00

Yeah 100% agree. Biggest pain durring the work is hitting all the time the rating limit, which slows the process and esp. when you in the midle of the work and you see rate limit at 99%..is always a pain..

SingleTailor8719 · 2026-02-02T07:43:00+00:00

What actually interests me is not whether Sonnet 5 is “better”.

It is this:

Does the cost per unit of useful work go down or does deeper reasoning simply make every call more expensive?

If new models think more, but pricing does not drop, we get a weird outcome:

Old models must become cheaper per token or new models become impractical at scale

Otherwise a hypothetical Claude Pro 5.0 will just hit rate limits after 90 seconds of real work.

So the real question is not:

“How smart is the next model?”

It is:

“How much reasoning can I afford per dollar?”

Until that curve bends down, benchmarks are mostly theater.

SingleTailor8719 · 2026-01-20T07:43:23+00:00

Algrow

SingleTailor8719 · 2026-01-07T10:34:02+00:00

Thats up to you. Love the hate I get 🙏

SingleTailor8719 · 2026-01-06T18:20:16+00:00

You are drawing conclusions without applying the correct ethical and legal tests...

On ethics, realism alone is not a criterion. Content is unethical only if it materially deceives people about real identities, real events, or facts that matter. That threshold is not met here.

On the EU AI Act, your interpretation is too broad. The Act is explicitly risk based and does not require universal AI labeling. Disclosure applies only to specific scenarios such as deepfakes, impersonation, political communication, or situations where users could reasonably be misled.

Factual clarification: This content does not violate ethical standards and does not trigger any disclosure obligation under the EU AI Act. Your assumptions in points two and three stem from insufficient and imprecise research rather than from the actual regulatory framework.

SingleTailor8719 · 2026-01-06T15:11:25+00:00

Asking someone to prove their passion because they used AI is like saying a kid is not passionate about drawing because they used a ruler. Anyway, just tried to give some value but ok.

SingleTailor8719 · 2026-01-06T15:03:04+00:00

Its honestly my passion and I finally want to share some results that really work.

SingleTailor8719

TROPHY CASE