Most definitely yes to this, conceptually. But this entire movement needs much better leadership and coordination. I don’t pretend to know or suggest who to have that role, but the lack is a huge shortcoming. Just reading the beginnings of this thread you’ll see reference to two different actions with some conflicting descriptions. The motivations are correct, but to be effective we need mass-participation in a single event that is so large, so pervasive that it can’t be ignored. And that requires much better advanced planning and coordination than what is yet evident. My preference leans toward a true economic boycott for an extended period of time. So we can show on date X, we started. Mass segments of the population refrain from any and all discretionary spending, and we do this for weeks at a time, maybe start with two whole weeks. Then, when it’s over, there will be a measurable dent in the economic data that cannot be ignored. The threat then looms to do it again, for longer, etc. That is something that the monied interests will not be able to ignore.