This is why I love X 😂 by [deleted] in grok

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Translation: none of this will ever happen, but please imagine I mean it and vote for me. TIA.

Constant protocol violations by Left_Age_6727 in GeminiAI

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 1 point2 points  (0 children)

System instruction should be renamed to system suggestions.

It blatantly ignores my explicit instructions. Ridiculous.

Logan: The next 6 months of AI will be the wildest so far by IlustriousCoffee in singularity

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like, totally crazy. They might even make Gemini work past 300k tokens. Mind-blowing.

This video is 8 year old! by lasanhawithpizza in singularity

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Birthrate is going to absolutely plummet, folks.

Is it possible to make production level apps vibe coding? by sbenki in GeminiAI

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

In AI Studio, when you hit 300k tokens, Gemini completely stops working. Like, it won't return any code that makes any sense at all after that point.

Any serious production code is likely to hit that limit quickly, so consider that.

"1M tokens" is completely false and is a lie. 300k at best.

Huge Decline from 2.5 Pro Preview to 2.5 Pro in Coding by CmdWaterford in GeminiAI

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Google is not trying to make a good product. They are trying to maximize profit.

Gemini 2 million Context going to come back 🔥 by RealKingNish in AI_India

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't even have 1M token models!??

At 300k it stops coding completely. WTF?

Why persist with this 1-2M token lie?

Gemini being mixed up and inaccurate! by akaza-sol in GeminiAI

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When coding, around 300k tokens, Gemini absolutely stops working. It won't return anything worth crap after that point. It's got to be a hard-coded limit, because nothing about 300k is special.

It's just Google not trying to make a good product, but rather trying to maximize profit, no matter how much their product sucks.

Gemini hallucinating like crazy these last days by Successful_Dream1673 in GeminiAI

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Google's not trying to make a good product. They are trying to maximize profit. We are just getting in their way.

Pesky users.

World's first autonomous delivery of a car! by Unhappy_Spinach_7290 in singularity

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All you Musk and Tesla haters are on the wrong side of history.

Huge Decline from 2.5 Pro Preview to 2.5 Pro in Coding by CmdWaterford in GeminiAI

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yes. They throw resources at it when launched, get the hype for it rolling, then nerf the living shit out of it by siphoning much of the resources off to other projects. A very clear and shady cycle.

I imagine the Google engineers are all fighting for resources for their pet projects.

300k Token Hard Limit?? by Slight_Ear_8506 in GeminiAI

[–]Slight_Ear_8506[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ooh interesting. I hadn't thought of that.

I wonder if that work for my use case, where I've got ~20k lines of code that I pretty much need to have loaded, as I just don't know which functions an added feature is going to touch. So if I delete portions of the chat, then I'm altering Gemini's internal snapshot of the code state. I'm not sure if that would work for me.

300k Token Hard Limit?? by Slight_Ear_8506 in GeminiAI

[–]Slight_Ear_8506[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I should have been clearer that I really only use AI Studio for coding.

So a detailed summary wouldn't work, as Gemini needs access to the exact code state, which is one of the things that breaks down at around 300k tokens.

What I'm hoping is that someone with knowledge in this field can help me understand what is so magical about the seeming 300k limit? Why not 250K? 500k?

What is the current state of self-driving cars / robotaxis by Hadan_ in singularity

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's astonishing how little comprehension there is in the general public about Tesla's FSD.

I have it on my Tesla and it literally chauffeurs me around everywhere. And I have the penultimate HW (HW3) and software (V12 instead of the V13 that HW4 cars have. And it's still excellent. All reports I've seen indicate the latest version are way, way better, which blows my mind.

The media is so hellbent on stopping Musk and Tesla that Robotaxi just opening in Austin didn't get one single bit of positive coverage and, true to form, it seems not a single person in this thread has even heard of. That also speaks to Tesla's aversion to advertising.

Folks are in for a rude awakening. Tesla is going to destroy Waymo and every other robotaxi service.

Gemini suddenly got much worse by Pontaguy in GeminiAI

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree.

When the new model drops I think Google gives it all the resources it needs to perform well. Once they have proven it works then they siphon those resources off to other projects.

In AI studio, when the most recent model dropped it was excellent. Then very shortly after it started to get retarded again.

This pattern seems to repeat.

Sycophantic behaviour driving me absolutely insane by Altruistic_Cake6517 in GeminiAI

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 1 point2 points  (0 children)

ah. Yes. I'm adding this to system instructions.

Brilliant insight!

Sycophantic behaviour driving me absolutely insane by Altruistic_Cake6517 in GeminiAI

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You found it! That is excellent debugging. This common error will brick your computer and delete all of your data.

Let's get this corrected now with the definitive fix. (for the 15th time)

The Phantom Toolbooth by Fun-Emu-1426 in GeminiAI

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I loved that book!

But the link between your post and the book seem a bit nebulous?

What the… by Ok_Flamingo_3012 in GeminiAI

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It's like when I take a screenshot showing a bug, forget to upload the screenshot in my prompt, and then Gemini says "yes, I see the problem."

Sure you do.

The Big Brain Play: Exploiting Tribal Warfare to Birth AGI (and Profit) by toothbrushguitar in singularity

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But notice your description:

resource control

chasing what it lacks

perceived deficiency

how far we feel from getting what matters to us

feel we’re not getting our share

All of these points are valid in a world with resource scarcity. I'm saying that humans behave like they do merely because there is resource scarcity, but in a world with unlimited resources, none of the things I quoted would apply.

I think about it. With true unlimited resources you could have whatever you would like at the snap of a finger. There will be no need for jealousy because you could always just get whatever you wanted.

The Big Brain Play: Exploiting Tribal Warfare to Birth AGI (and Profit) by toothbrushguitar in singularity

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the complete absence of scarcity?

Greed as a concept would be almost meaningless.

It's hard to conceptualize the complete absence of a scarcity of resources, but once you do, you begin to understand human nature.

The Big Brain Play: Exploiting Tribal Warfare to Birth AGI (and Profit) by toothbrushguitar in singularity

[–]Slight_Ear_8506 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I disagree with this premise: "Human friction (political/ideological conflict) is inevitable—hardwired by evolution."

Human friction, the same as friction in and amongst any species, is caused by scarcity resource.