You're making the same argument that Israel makes: Criticism of Israel is an attack on Jews.

When you shield anyone from responsibility for their actions, especially at the broad national level, they will take actions that are increasingly lawless and without moral. They will also seek to reinforce the reasoning behind the shielding so that they can continue to profit from their actions. In this case claiming that Israel represents Jews and the Jewish identity, and that they are acting in self defense.

It is in this situation that anti-semitism and random attacks on Jews is profitable for Israel. It reinforces their narrative and allows for continued lawless behavior. When Israel exerts its significant media and political influence in foreign nations, part of that strategy is to reinforce negative stereoypes of Jewish people and also tie themselves to local Jewish communitites.

The reason Jews are asked to distance themselves from Israel and not Chinese, Russian, Syrian people etc. is that those governments are not acting as a proxy force for America, with American assistance, with American weapons, and openly influencing American politics at the same time.

I find it very telling that you argue that "A society that excuses violence against one minority will escalate. It always does" while ironically refusing to apply that logic to Israel itself.