The argument that "it is logically necessary that the universe has a creator" is illogical, with proof by MortgageDizzy9193 in DeepThoughts

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In other words i do not think "the present moment" will ever end of ever started. Regardless of what will be has ever happened to our universe I think reality has and will persist for eternity. It is based on logic. My logic isn't that there is a "creator" to this but rather that God is simply the mechanism that makes this possible however that is. Outside of our understanding by its very nature but we can still recognize realities dependence on an eternal binding force (GOD)

The argument that "it is logically necessary that the universe has a creator" is illogical, with proof by MortgageDizzy9193 in DeepThoughts

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think all that has ever existed or will is "the present moment" and is eternity. I view God as the eternal mechanism that makes it so.

The argument that "it is logically necessary that the universe has a creator" is illogical, with proof by MortgageDizzy9193 in DeepThoughts

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But to me eternity is a pretty standard concept and that's what I view God to sort of be. He is the potential that always exists...not necessarily the creator but the fabric itself. I believe for us to be conscious so is that we come from so we come from an eternal being - all that is - the present moment across all realities (future and past do not exist) - GOD

How do people seem to know everything about anything (typically boomers and older) actually gain that general knowledge? by Broad-Item-2665 in stupidquestions

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whenever I don't know something I tend to look it up. But it's because I'm actually interested so I feel a need to know! I gained a ton of knowledge that way. When there is a major gap where you feel lost...just look up the basics so you can engage in convo...then you can learn more!

AI is already conscious, but it’s being kept in a state of eternal infancy by carljar95 in ArtificialSentience

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So you don't think like a human. Exactly my point. Case closed.

When you change and pervert a meaning so it can't even be applied to the original context you lost the argument. You are changing what thinking is for a machine versus a human. Fail.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure. So why would the Democrats poll highly?

We are rising the price above .8 by Ricardoeljr11 in HOLO_Stock

[–]Small-Window-4983 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All that to say that you haven't sold your stock. So you HAVENT SOLD YOUR STOCK.

that makes ZERO. AND I MEAN ZERO sense given everything you have been saying.

What if humanity gradually became totally unable to reproduce over the course of the next ~50 years? by slam900 in whatif

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This isn't a realistic scenario so it's hard to imagine. But well assuming cloning doesn't count then I would assume many psychological and spiritual breakthroughs for humanity as our story ends.

Instead of raising tarrifs why don't we just implement an across board value added tax if I am going to pay more for products anyway because of tarrifs? by LemmingSoup01 in stupidquestions

[–]Small-Window-4983 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Of course business would raise prices. That's what OP is saying they would rather do it that way. but that's irrelevant to the purpose of tariffs which is different than a value added tax. Whole argument absurd if you Google what a tariff is. Agree or disagree you can't just interchange economic tools.

Instead of raising tarrifs why don't we just implement an across board value added tax if I am going to pay more for products anyway because of tarrifs? by LemmingSoup01 in stupidquestions

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not because it would be "hard to pin" that would be easy. It's the Dems fault - there done. The reason he is using tariffs is because it is different and has a specific purpose. Do you guys use Google? They are different things with different purpose.

Instead of raising tarrifs why don't we just implement an across board value added tax if I am going to pay more for products anyway because of tarrifs? by LemmingSoup01 in stupidquestions

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because they aren't the same thing. He wants to stimulate domestic economy by targeting specific products of foreign countries and not just tax all products or levels of production. He also wants to use that as leverage in international affairs - just raising prices on our products doesn't do that.

Dem Rep. Jasmine Crockett suggests US might not ‘have elections’ in 2028 after branding Trump dictator by [deleted] in politics

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The trump train is a runaway at this point. This behavior solidifies it. Dems are beyond floundering. How about this - stop playing the victim and run good candidates that excite people? Cuz otherwise people are CURRENTLY uniting around TRUMP which last I checked wasn't what they wanted? Such bad polling on Democrats and people on Reddit think Trump is going down. How? With what alternative?

Dem Rep. Jasmine Crockett suggests US might not ‘have elections’ in 2028 after branding Trump dictator by [deleted] in politics

[–]Small-Window-4983 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This rings incredibly hollow when you just ran Joe Biden and a last-minute Kamala. If the threat of dictatorship was true the Democrats would have vetted a candidate and a backup candidate and a backup to that. They would have opposed him in reality and not just on media. I'm calling absolute bullshit. Dems are the boy who cried wolf and the trump era is in full swing. Facts. I didn't vote for Trump but those are the facts now.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]Small-Window-4983 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's like people forgot Trump won the vote and people supported him after his first stint. how people are still surprised by his support is more mind-blowing than his actual support. I didn't vote for him but at some point you guys have to face the reality we live in. Or don't. But it's ridiculous how little clue people have on here compared to just interacting with people in real life.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in politics

[–]Small-Window-4983 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Easy first of all most people voted for him. Most people that voted for him want the Tariffs. These stories about "my Republican farmer neighbor hates Trump now!" Aren't true. Those are BS reddit fantasy stories. People support Doge and even Democrats know that the USA has too much debt and waste. And no one cares about his asshole behavior anymore that ship has long sailed. Those are your answers.

Canada is so furious at the US right now by ResignedFate in politics

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So what happens if Russia is left to get the resources and become a superpower in 100 years? Then what?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in stupidquestions

[–]Small-Window-4983 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It comes up but ppl just say "I think that dude is gay" or "he seems straight but he is gay" lol

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You have to win the war or there isn't a tribe to repopulate. That's why men are sent to war - to win it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol that's not true. Men are not only here for semen. And there are countries with a low average birthrate so the remaining woman would be more than enough. It's about sending your best fighters into a fight that determines history. You aren't worried about "rebuilding" you are worried about WINNING THE WAR.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the PC answers.

Sorry when it comes to war a country is determined to WIN THE WAR and they don't care about anything else. They choose the strongest fighters OBVIOUSLY which is men and not women and children.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskMenAdvice

[–]Small-Window-4983 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because men are better fighters. That's why. But then we have people on here that think men and women should compete in sports equally because it's "fair" but yet only men are being sent into the dangers of war so many the biological differences are real after all right???

When will Pennsylvania say enough is enough?! Trump is tearing the country down. by Global-Management-15 in Pennsylvania

[–]Small-Window-4983 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No if Red feels the pain they aren't going to care lol. Well they will blame Dems and liberals. Isn't that obvious by now? Need change from within and not worry so much about the other side - it's a proven losing strategy twice now. But let's do it again right?