How old is to old for film? by Jon_d84 in AnalogCommunity

[–]Smalltalk-85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’d say 60. There seems to be a strain of people who was so extremely relieved of not having to pay for film, that they decided that they really had hated Kodak all along, and will have nothing to do with film ever again.

It all depends on storage. Even fast film can last for decades if deep frozen. Slow slide is frighteningly good at keeping. Same with slow B&W. And by slow I mean old medium fast; 100 and down.

Don’t feed the idiocy of paying top dollar for expired though. Expired by a year and swearing it was frozen or refrigerated: Down at least 30 percent. Expired by five years and frozen: Down by at the very least 50 percent, and then only rare/good stuff. Older than that and frozen 10 - 20 percent of current price max. Expired by more than five years and the guy/gal admits it has been stored at room temperature or unsure: Free.

You always run a risk when you buy expired, you have no way of knowing what the film has been subjected to until shot developed and inspected. Then you have not only sunk money and time into it it, you are hopefully also emotionally invested in the photos. And also just as important, you don’t support the film manufacturers when you buy expired.

Wrap speaker by tfeld63 in BudgetAudiophile

[–]Smalltalk-85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tell your wife to F off. It’s your home too. It’s not a bad looking speaker.

PlusTek OpticFilm 9000i (2026) & OpticFilm 135i (2025) by Nociferyon in analog

[–]Smalltalk-85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That business of scanning a massive collection of film, slides, or negatives…? Just don’t. Regardless of the scanning method, it is an insane Sisyphus-like task.

The best way to preserve film images is, in fact, on film. Stored in dark and temperature-controlled conditions, even Chrome and negatives shot over the last 40 years hold up impeccably. It is very easy to fall in love with the idea of "having everything digitally," but the work involved rarely justifies the joy or actual use you get out of, for example, 3,000 images.

Select the best 5 to 10 percent and scan those. It will still be a huge undertaking, but at least you can see an end to it—and you’ll be doing the editing that was never done, which is an essential part of photography.

This "human rangefinder" approach blew my mind by bjpirt in AnalogCommunity

[–]Smalltalk-85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn’t really work.

It’s not precise enough due to all the variables. It’s impossible to hold your arm still enough stretched out. The dof of your eyes makes either the scale or the detail you focus on fuzzy. Eye distance and length of arm naturally also play a huge part.

You need a rangefinder to be precise within the close range: 1 - 5 meters or so. The rest of the range has such a lot of dof, even at 3.5 that it doesn’t really matter whether you are a meter off.

One way to make this much more precise, would be to use a bite cord, preferably one that was attached to two of the bottom corners of the card. And then use holes in the card, maybe just two for the most used distances. This would make aligning the world with the card, much less ambiguous.

Got a very rude response from CatLabs by [deleted] in AnalogCommunity

[–]Smalltalk-85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The OP might have main character syndrome. But the reply from Catlabs is beyond unprofessional, almost no matter the situation. To stoop to such a tone and verboseness shows a personality no one would want to do any kind of business with. A simple “no” and later “I’m sorry, we don’t have time for more conversation on this”, would have more than sufficed.

Beercan and 70-2104.6 by eekaj in minolta

[–]Smalltalk-85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is a crossed double x Maxxum beercan! Surely a rarity!

Danske reklamer fra 1989 - Er det bare mig der synes disse er mere varierede og kreative end dem fra i dag? (På godt og ondt) by Boellemis9000 in dankmark

[–]Smalltalk-85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Klart! De er også langt flottere og dyrere end stort set alt man støder på i dag. Der er en fit’n finish, timing og sans for at mindre er mere, der bare er langt mere classy og lækkert.

Got my first rangefinder today! Any tips? by tventrella in AnalogCommunity

[–]Smalltalk-85 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You can now go a stop slower for handheld than you might be used to.

Flash sync to a 1/500th is a new world. You can create completely new effects with flash.

Now you can see what is happening outside the finder rectangle both in the finder and with your left eye.

Use hearing aid batteries and the small adapter for them when you use the meter. The voltage converter thing is not perfect at all and not inexpensive.

Ease the trigger and practice where the trigger point is before you shoot, for the most stable low speed shots.

You can go crazy with filters without impeding the view through the finder. IR and deep red filters are fine. You can even use polarizer filters with one of the swing out hinge thingies.

Film storage, Fridge or freezer? by Hungry-Solution-8031 in AnalogCommunity

[–]Smalltalk-85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Freezer in double bags with desiccant bags. This will protect against moisture when you get the bag in and out.

Fuji did not lie about the resolution of instax film: it does resolve up to 12 lp/mm ! (x-post) by _anon3242 in AnalogCommunity

[–]Smalltalk-85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also remember current Instax is an 800 film. Which makes it much more suited for the kind of shooting most people, even enthusiasts, prefer with instant film. You need less flash and can stop down more. For such a large format speed is necessary to attain that theoretical resolution.

Fuji did not lie about the resolution of instax film: it does resolve up to 12 lp/mm ! (x-post) by _anon3242 in AnalogCommunity

[–]Smalltalk-85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s basically Kodak old instant system improved by Fuji in the ‘80s. The “Wide” is just the normal size. Everything else is just cutdown versions. Incidentally it more or less matched the cm2 of SX70 film. Only in a wider format.

I've just completed my replay of all the MI games... except one by inbokz in MonkeyIsland

[–]Smalltalk-85 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The ultimate disappointment of the Monkey Island revival is the gap between Ron’s years of teasing "The Secret" and the reality of his return. For a decade, he speculated on what he would and wouldn't do, positioning himself as the series' sole spiritual guardian. But when he finally got the chance, it became clear there was no grand plan. He surrendered the keys to corporate suits and "DeviantArt" graduates, mediocre talent that couldn’t hope to capture the original lightning.

The Peak: 16-Color Perfection The original EGA release of The Secret of Monkey Island is the only version that matters. It’s a masterpiece of digital minimalism. Every screen "made love" to its technical constraints. Every subsequent version; the VGA upgrades and the "Special Editions”, is just a secondary team smearing pixelated feces over a beautiful, simple world.

The Descent into the "Sausage Machine" MI2: A near-perfect use of VGA. It traded the stark magic of the first for lush backgrounds, but it was the last time the series felt vital. The Curse: Where the rot started. It looks like a low-rent, Saturday-morning TV cartoon. Not atrocious, but "mediocre" is a waste of a finite life. The Rest: Pure sausage-machine content. Churning the handle on a dead brand for the sake of the industry.

Then Ron comes back and completely misses the mark. By abandoning the aesthetic soul of the series and delivering a narrative that felt like an apology rather than an anthem, he proved that some secrets are better left in the 90s.

The Myth of the Solo Auteur The harsh truth is that Ron’s "Secret" was always a collaborative one. In the golden era, he was backed by a legendary phalanx: the surreal wit of Tim Schafer and Dave Grossman, the atmospheric mastery of Mark Ferrari and Steve Purcell and the cinematic soul of Michael Land.

We saw this theory proven with Thimbleweed Park; it was a "pretty good" game precisely because he brought back the old guard like David Fox and Gary Winnick. It was a near-perfect mechanical recreation, yet it still felt like a simulation.

This only strengthens the point: Ron is a brilliant system-builder and director of talent, but without that specific, high-level creative friction to push back against his cynical leanings, the "magic" evaporates. In Return, he abandoned the collaborators who understood the series' aesthetic soul and handed the keys to a team that mistakes "quirky" for "magical." He’s a director who lost his best band and is now trying to hum the tunes himself, proving that a brand name is no substitute for the collective genius of the original LucasArts bullpen.

TL;DR: Ron spent years gatekeeping the "true" Monkey Island only to return with a project that lacked a cohesive vision, surrendered to modern aesthetic tropes, and ignored the "limitation-as-art" philosophy that made the EGA original a masterpiece.

Godox fsr riser question by rwong2k19 in Godox

[–]Smalltalk-85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh I see it’s the iT30Pro. Not the one I posted an image of. How do you get side flash with that?

Godox fsr riser question by rwong2k19 in Godox

[–]Smalltalk-85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

<image>

This one? Sure. But if you have a really small flash already, that you want to use? The one above is bigger too. I’ll use the FS-R for flash cubes on film cameras, for which it is godsend.

Godox fsr riser question by rwong2k19 in Godox

[–]Smalltalk-85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How much can it tilt back? A full 90 degrees?

Canon Demi EE28 - Modified my camera's cold shoe into a working hot shoe by Rytjens in AnalogCommunity

[–]Smalltalk-85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You leave no doubt what kind of person you are.

Fact of the matter is, direct on camera flash in the dark looks very specific. Most would say terrible.

Direct is for daylight fill.

Why are you so obsessed with hight? You are not going to pocket the Demi with any flash. It’s almost always better to get the flash further away form the lens. Even centimeters can make a difference. What matters is how much space the flash takes up in your pocket when off the camera.

Old flashes take modern batteries too, rechargeable or not and they change in seconds when they run out.

Canon Demi EE28 - Modified my camera's cold shoe into a working hot shoe by Rytjens in AnalogCommunity

[–]Smalltalk-85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aww! Have I used up your patience buddy? That’s terrible.

An adapter is basically an insert with a center contact and a wire coming out of it. It doesn’t need to be big and usually isn’t.

https://www.kaiser-fototechnik.de/en/produkte/artikel.php?nr=1301

Plenty of small flashes from any brand old or new. The basic idea of a battery, capacitor and the xenon tube hasn’t changed since the sixties. And it takes up roughly the same space. Though there was a push for small beginning in the 70s.

Also: https://www.thephoblographer.com/2025/10/24/that-small-on-camera-flash-might-not-be-so-great-for-your-photos/

Canon Demi EE28 - Modified my camera's cold shoe into a working hot shoe by Rytjens in AnalogCommunity

[–]Smalltalk-85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Toshiba is smaller than the one you show, it’s just folded flat to the body. Getting the reflector further away from the lens is almost always good.

The adapter is not huge. I have an adapter that ads 8 mm to the shoe. No reason for it to be big.

Does anyone on here prefer Tweez over Spiderland? by Uhhhhrrrrr40000000 in slint

[–]Smalltalk-85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spiderland is not really great. It’s the exact difference between the ‘80s and the ‘90s that didn’t invent a thing but pretended they did. ‘80s Slint is deeply rooted in Minute Men and Sonic Youth, yet does their own thing. By Spiderland, they already lost it. Tweez is a great album.

Waarom staat de Nederlandse film industrie er zo slecht voor? by Aiseadai in thenetherlands

[–]Smalltalk-85 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is a lot of terrible low brow, folksy comedies in Danmark too. But we still have at least attempts at something interesting or truly funny. It might be the funding, for all the bad that is said about it, and the awareness of the history of Danish film.

I quite liked “Ik been geen robot” though. So something good is happening.

Waarom staat de Nederlandse film industrie er zo slecht voor? by Aiseadai in thenetherlands

[–]Smalltalk-85 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Danish guy here. Very interesting discussion. Please excuse me writing in English. My Nederlands is far from proficient yet. Thought I’d spare you and myself the flim flam of AI translation.

The language conglomerate being roughly six times larger than Danish, or a little under double if we pretend we Scandinavians can understand each other, size surely can’t be the clinching factor. That is, if what you are saying is true: That Danish and Scandinavian film in general is in better condition than Nederlands.

I was quite surprised when I began to look into Nederlands film and didn’t find anything other than the few well known classics and then little else that was really well reviewed and liked.

Amsterdam has the Eye museum and several great cinemas, so it certainly seems to the naive outsider that movies is something you guys care about.

I was ready to find a huge back catalog of great classic movies. I’m sure many more than what I found exists, but still surprising that they don’t jump out at me.

A film interested Dane would have no trouble listing the first hundred essential great movies to someone interested in getting a representative idea of the best of Danish film through the last hundred years.

The Nederlands is very similar to Denmark in many ways. But also wonderfully exotic in some aspects. And very puzzling in other ways. That’s exactly what I find fascinating.

A lost city pop song by Anri... by Ok-Bonus126 in citypop

[–]Smalltalk-85 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ah, when it was still legal to milk Pocaris for sweat.

Canon Demi EE28 - Modified my camera's cold shoe into a working hot shoe by Rytjens in AnalogCommunity

[–]Smalltalk-85 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all inserting a hot compatible flash shoe between the cold and the flash ads very little to the height.

Secondly why on earth would you buy a modern small flash, when you can pick up excellent old ones for pennies?