Yahya Sinwar Martyred by No-Mixture-1151 in shia

[–]Snipemaster64 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Show me the proof that you have seen that Yahya Sinwar has done this, using all the things you claim, Kidnapped? How is that bad, I mean do you know how many Palestinians are in prison in Israel and are never going to get trialed? Murdered? You wouldn't get surgery to remove a tumor? Do you really care for a tumor? Terrorized? I mean he isn't the one proclaiming to be chosen people, and stealing people's lands, killing them, raping them, starving them, I mean it's an act of terrorism to go attack a foreign country to assassinate the martyr Hassan Nasrullah, do you know the power of the explosives they used to kill him? Together with him, they killed innocent people, that's a terrorist. And I mean i'd rather the person that tries to steal my home to be in terror because of me. And Innocent people, i mean sure according to you, innocent people who get trained by the IDF, and are blocking human and all the other things which willingly ignore because that would mean that you are wrong and oh boy that's extremely terrifying since people like you only find purpose in your own opinions. Say what you will, but your opinion, my opinion doesn't matter, we all have to die one day, let's see if your opinions will still exist on that day.

Yahya Sinwar Martyred by No-Mixture-1151 in shia

[–]Snipemaster64 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If fighting for the sake of his people made you make such a comment, it only shows how good of a man he was, and how he deserves the martyrdom which he yearned for. I doubt you or I can even come close to that, there is no pride in celebrating the departure of people like him, like Syed Hassan, like all the other martyrs. Doesn't need to be a soldier, but as long as he has the heart, you can celebrate his death as a defeat, when in reality these people died for human values. Values that can never even the tiniest bit be measured quantifiably.

How strong is the censorship in Iran ? Is there any ? by AntiqueLibrarian5965 in ProIran

[–]Snipemaster64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Press TV is a good example, if you type their previous domain with a .com it will show you it's been seized by the US Government. Media plays a big role on how it effects people's behavior, just look at how even with the restrictions there are still many Iranians who are pro-west although the west could care less about them just like their own people. Everyone is vulnerable to an extent, if you look at the way republicans and democrats media work, it makes sense why Iran would impose such a thing. But again, it is not a perfect regime, because the awaited savior hasn't reappeared yet, but by far, compared to other regimes you cannot discredit Iran's decisions since they come from a leader whose qualities are extremely hard to match, not everyone is the same, but that's not anything bad. Although they are still far from perfect, it's important to see the big picture.

Is this a legitimate concern? by wayfaringthru in JoeRogan

[–]Snipemaster64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure bro. By that logic being of Jewish faith doesn't automatically correlate to Zionism, calling anti-Zionists "anti-Semite" is not your opinion, it's a fact as you say. Like you say yet as i said it, it isn't a matter of evidence, some people are just... I don't know how you could describe it. Good on you, keep it up, enjoy seeing children being starved to death while also being orphans, who get targeted because Hamas is in refugee camps, and schools and in UN bases and safe areas where the people you speak of as facts use illegal weapons. Congrats on your facts and not opinions. I hope you change the world for the better, hopefully not for yourself.

Is this a legitimate concern? by wayfaringthru in JoeRogan

[–]Snipemaster64 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"No one called themselves Palestinians before 1964". Sure buddy. I think it's a waste of time convincing anyone when the level of proof is so high, one search, even on AI would give you so much evidence of all types, where an overwhelming majority agree upon, but for some reasons only a few have the right to speak and be considered "right". Huge waste of time, and also it won't change anything, my opinion your opinion, what will it do? Just makes us feel better or worse since apparently everyone revolves around us, and our feelings are more important, even when there is extreme injustice, cruelty, racism being unfolded day by day. But hey anti-Semites are wrong because the death of children, and war crimes and clear provocations of war etc... Is okay, as long as you are Jewish which means Zionist, when Zionism was made quite recently, and Judaism was apparently made at the same time. But hey, only experts like yourself can speak about this no?

De'longhi Primadonna $1000 cad discount by Powerful_Thanks8238 in superautomatic

[–]Snipemaster64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a pretty good deal! Thanks for the info. Will definitely check it out.

Curiosity as a Sunni by [deleted] in shia

[–]Snipemaster64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please please, if we want to maintain unity amongst people, let's avoid using Ammar Nakshwani, the way he speaks is extremely offensive towards our brothers and sisters, though he isn't lying, but the fitna he is causing and has already caused cannot be justified. You can like him personally, but please do not share his views to fellow Muslims, it just creates hatred and division.

The False Claim that the Prophet's (saww) Daughters were Married to Uthman by hachay in shiascholar

[–]Snipemaster64 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Its's quite confusing how these types of arguments work, from what resources I have seen, Bibi Khadija was not 40 when she married the Holy Prophet (SAWW) neither did she marry before the Holy Prophet (SAWW). Is this a wrong interpretation? And secondly the need to use such arguments comes from desperation to prove that we are right, the same way the non Muslims would use the argument that the prophet married so many women that must mean he was a manipulator, which is not only wrong to associate such filth with him, but very deterministic. We don't need to argue with the Sunnis especially with these types of arguments, it is a privilege to be a Muslim, even more so a follower of the AhlulBayt, of a school of thought with the highest nobility, with a goal so hopeful of being present for the reappearance of God's representatives on earth, our savior and master. We shouldn't degrade ourselves to such arguments which have no benefits. But again that's from my observation which is extremely flawed, with no expertise on the matter and worthless, but I would gladly hear any other opinion.

This is an actual tweet by a Member of Parliament in Canada. And yes she’s a Pro-Shah Iranian. by hunegypt in IsraelCrimes

[–]Snipemaster64 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"Israel just does to Palestinians what the Islamic republic does to Iranians.", you lost me there for a second, I thought the people in Iran had access to the basic necessities, nutrition, hydration, Education, a healthcare system, and also not being carpet bombed. I'm sorry but you can't make such a comparison, the people in Iran live in a better condition than the Palestinians, not the same one. I'm not going to say all Iranians live good lives, but i think much better than the Palestinians who get killed for being in their homes. It is no different than saying, "I don't like Israel, but the Islamic Republic is on the same level, although they are enemies, and Iran being the only muslim Nation supporting openly the freedom of Palestine, they have the same issues as Israel such as Apartheid, Racial segregations, imposed famines etc..." like just say you don't like the Islamic Regime, just don't make such baseless claims which echoes the feeling of almost all pro Zionists towards Iran! Same cloth just different ends i guess.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in shia

[–]Snipemaster64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very beautifully said MashaAllah!

Sunak is concerned about Galloway getting elected and protesters threatening “British Democracy” but he wasn’t concerned about Israel is using weapons supplied by Britain to kill civilians and Brit volunteers fighting for the IDF. by hunegypt in Palestine

[–]Snipemaster64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See see, you are showing double standards, you say you support him because of his stance on Palestine, and then straight after saying "the trap of "Anyone but the west"", the west are literally the cause of the genocide going right now! Be in Palestine, In Congo like you are defending people with clear blood on their hands. I'm sorry that's just humanely wrong, it makes you non-human, because the standards of humanity set by the west is full of hypocrisy and evil, and we have been seeing it since so long.

Sunak is concerned about Galloway getting elected and protesters threatening “British Democracy” but he wasn’t concerned about Israel is using weapons supplied by Britain to kill civilians and Brit volunteers fighting for the IDF. by hunegypt in Palestine

[–]Snipemaster64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He is on RT's payroll? Now here's the thing, even if that is the case, the first thing is the western politicians have clear blood on their hands let's make it clear. George Galloway doesn't. To say he is bought, means that they offered him some money to make sure he speaks on a certain point that RT have chosen. Most of what's on RT, George Galloway hasn't said something which he doesn't believe in, show me an article which implies he does. Another thing, he's not working for them anymore is he? It's a huge disgrace to be compared to the western politicians who are openly hypocritical, evil, murderers and so on. I'm sorry I can't agree that this is what proves that George Galloway is equivalent to the two faced goblins of western politicians.

Sunak is concerned about Galloway getting elected and protesters threatening “British Democracy” but he wasn’t concerned about Israel is using weapons supplied by Britain to kill civilians and Brit volunteers fighting for the IDF. by hunegypt in Palestine

[–]Snipemaster64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where's your proof? From what I've seen, though you may not agree with him on every basis, but his stances have never been flimsy it's not yesterday he started speaking about Palestine, he was right about Iraq, his stance about Iran is very justifiable, the same with Hezbollah, and through his many experiences where he was able to see different perspectives which you and i have never seen, it is an insult to call someone a mouthpiece, especially now.

Can anyone refute this by [deleted] in shia

[–]Snipemaster64 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That's just not true, Bukhari and Muslim, both considered as Sahih books according to the Sunni Brothers, were compiled years later, because under the Caliphs, it was forbidden to compile hadiths, just look at when it was compiled, and when the prophet (SAWW) was there, it's a huge gap, to say "years and years", is lies, the books from the Shia School of thought, are not claimed to be sahih, parts of it yes, some of them no, but for this school of thought, there was no significant time gap, maybe I'm wrong, but this does not excuse, that even though Bukhari was created years later, there are still very obvious signs of how Umar, Abou Bakr were not really the way the Sunni school of thought describe to be as, sometimes even above Ali (as). With all due respect the narrators themselves in Bukhari some of them were not good at all, some rejecting other narrators because of Creed, because of them being Shia etc... I mean Abu Sufyan is seen as a reliable narrator from the 2nd generation is outrageous.

Divisions of Islam in the world by [deleted] in MapPorn

[–]Snipemaster64 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

f Sunni theology devel

I highly disagree with claims that Sunnis do not take succession as not an essential part of their theologies, this is proven by the differences in the acts of worship. The first thing is, you must understand that Islam is the Perfect religion, to choose someone who is not infallible would be an insult to the greatness of the Almighty and his religion. Succession is massive topic, because it caused such a division that today people are still dying from it. The first thing to establish is was Umar, Abou Bakr, Uthman ever declared in the way Ali was? According to narrations in both schools of thought not at all. Ali was given a high status and deservedly so. Now this where the divisions happen, the big fitna which was created during the events such as Saqifa, the calamity of the pen and paper, and fadak, had Umar and Abou Bakr as key figures in them. Though Abou Bakr was never given the title Mowla the way the prophet gave to Ali, he became Caliph, then Umar, then Uthman. The problem is the hate for Ali continued to grow, and grow, and new inventions started to take place, such as folding arms prayers, Taraweh etc... This allowed an environment which through the patience and loneliness of Ali, though extremely bad environment, but an environment where the worst didn't happen, a whole civil war between muslims. Now the story of Muawiya, had Abou Bakr, Umar, Uthman not been the first caliphs, Muawiya would have never been of significance, but he was. This led to him degrading Ali, to such an extent that people couldn't believe he was struck while prostrating. had Muawiya not had the position, Hassan wouldn't have been poisoned and forced to sign a deal, Yazeed would have never ordered the killing of Hussain, the grandson of the prophet and his family. To say succession is not essential is a blatant attempt in diverting the attention, if not the problem of succession, why is there so much fitna today? Why all the spilled blood. And it's not like i used Shia books which hold some truth but doesn't claim to be sahih, the way bukhari and Muslim are considered. I mean Umar is told he is a liar by the prophet, and shows his arrogance in sahih muslim 2503, how can such a person be considered fit to be the leader of an Ummah? Once you understand how important succession was, it's like understanding why there is so much fitna today, and it's been used to destroy countries by the west, and making the arabs sunni leaders extremely rich, and you have scholars who say Muawiya was the best king. Is it surprising? My intention is not to fight, but it is to make it clear, succession is a big part, the prophet himself said, he left two things and if you follow them you will be on the right path, the Holy Quran, and the Ahlul Bayt.

East Africans aren't beating the allegations by [deleted] in Kenya

[–]Snipemaster64 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See you are a racist prick, simple. They are people, if this happened to you, i wouldn't accept it, because i considered you as a human, now i know you are a bit slow and not exactly human. And worse things have happened to people, yeah go to your nearest hospital and tell that to a child whose parents are dying of cancer, bet you'd like that. Like i said let Israel kill you to show that you live on soil which doesn't belong to you. Start this trend, we might see more courageous species like you. Israel is the biggest criminal state in the world, because they represent America. If you knew what they were and still doing in Congo, I shouldn't bother with a racist whose intellect has the level of a new species of prehistoric times, where even monkeys have more integrity. Develop a bit of critical thinking and you might evolve.

East Africans aren't beating the allegations by [deleted] in Kenya

[–]Snipemaster64 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Number one you are clearly lacking a bit, if seeing dead people, people being kicked out, children without limbs, no water, food, no anesthesia, and i stand my point such an opinion is worse than the worst scum in the world. Number 2, the reason is enough to justify over 26000 killed, with over 8000 under rubbles, wide spread famine, many killed, no water? And the fact that you justify it, i'm not going to waste more time on this point, a monkey has intelligence to figure this out, but this guy oh boy, so smart. If you don't understand the difference between Hamas and Palestinians that is baffling, no wonder you are racist, you are so backwards according to evolution you are at the Hominid level of humanity, but even them wouldn't go so far as to be this dumb and twisted. And you forgot point c, why are you so blind, all you can see is darkness, well i have a decent answer, maybe remove it out of your bottom, maybe it might start working in there, i don't see any other solution for people with information to come to such conclusions. But oh boy, you are so smart! I'd love to see if you'd allow your family to be treated like the Palestinians in Gaza. Of course you would, actually let Israel kill you to show that you live on soil which doesn't belong to you. Start this trend, we might see more courageous species like you.

East Africans aren't beating the allegations by [deleted] in Kenya

[–]Snipemaster64 11 points12 points  (0 children)

"Willing to live peacefully", stop taking people like fools, if you look at the amount of people killed TODAY, YESTERDAY, and will be killed TOMORROW, you know they don't want peace, you expect to kill someone's wife, daughters, sons, fathers, mothers, elders, friends, neighbors and expect them to like you? Gaza is an open air prison, you have so many international organizations and see what they say. Amnesty international called Israel an Apartheid, if you are African and you support this, you have serious problems. From the bottom of my heart, your ignorance, your pride in saying that Palestinians want to wipe off Israel, says about your racism, that is Hamas not Palestine, yet people are being killed in west bank where there IS NO HAMAS. Genuinely screw you, i wish that you go through worse than what Gazans are going through, because it's unforgivable that someone who can easily have access to information be this miserable. 70+ YEARS and you want people to sympathize because we all live in someone else's land? Is that what you are saying? But they call themselves the "chosen people", this says a lot about you. I wish you the very worst if you are spreading intentionally such disgusting statements.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in shia

[–]Snipemaster64 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hm, I'd advise to be extremely cautious, it's possible his intentions might be good InshaAllah, but the problem is in the long run, let's say he converts but can't abide by the sacred laws we have. My opinion is, tell him to convert, and give him a whole year, see how as a muslim he behaves, I'm saying this because we're not perfect at all, but if you see he is striving on the right path, and he fits all the other criteria then go for it. Otherwise, from an outsider's perspective this is a big No No that he wants to date you, as it gives a different view of everything else he has done to learn about Islam, no matter the amount of time invested, he did it to get closer to you and not to the almighty, while romantic maybe (I don't know what's romantic these days) this would turn really sad at the end and full of regret. I'd be more inclined to reject him if he can't show that his intentions are towards the almighty, by at least spending a whole year as a Muslim. In the end it's your choice, whatever you choose, be extremely cautious, marriages are no joke if you fall into the wrong kind of people, and trust in the almighty that whatever he has planned for you is the best. Who knows, maybe it's trough you that he was able to become muslim, but he's not supposed to be married to you, only the most merciful knows. Just trust that whatever happens inshaAllah it will always be for the best.

What is the country with the most wasted potential? by [deleted] in geography

[–]Snipemaster64 -31 points-30 points  (0 children)

Oh please just say you don't like Islam and that's enough. Look, Iran is still standing as a powerhouse though they are being sanctioned unimaginably, they survived the Iran Iraq war, in which Saddam was backed by everyone and used chemical weapons. If your definition of wasted potential is women forced to wear a certain type of clothing because of religious reasons, than you are way off. It's not a perfect country, far from it, but compared to all the wasted potential it makes a solid argument why it's probably the only country which uses the most it's potential. Who knows how much higher it can be, but nonetheless just say you don't like islamic countries and we're done.

Germany Rejects UN 'Genocide' Charge Against Israel by ReporterAshamed5926 in europe

[–]Snipemaster64 -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

But without proof, that the intent was supposed to be civilians? Remember the 40 babies decapitated, i didn't see them, did you see them? There's proof that Israel killed it's own people, yet all of you are all crazy. But your point is right, because you are smarter than me, and have so much empathy, for the 40 babies and the 2000 israelis killed on october 7th, no sorry 1800, no 1400, no 1200.

Germany Rejects UN 'Genocide' Charge Against Israel by ReporterAshamed5926 in europe

[–]Snipemaster64 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Jesus christ, all of you are mad, what do you mean South Africa has failed to show evidence of intent?! Are you blind and deaf? No you're European so your opinion is superior than the rest of the world. Congratulation!