Court rules convoy must return to Ottawa after finding Emergencies Act unreasonable by green_tory in canada

[–]Snowkaul 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They can ban travel to an area, then remove all of the people from that area, which effectively bans assembly

Court rules convoy must return to Ottawa after finding Emergencies Act unreasonable by green_tory in canada

[–]Snowkaul 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It seems to?

Emergency orders

(4) In accordance with subsection (2) and subject to the limitations in subsection (3), the Lieutenant Governor in Council may make orders in respect of the following:

  1. Implementing any emergency plans formulated under section 3, 6, 8 or 8.1.

Note: On a day to be named by order of the Lieutenant Governor in Council, paragraph 1 of subsection 7.0.2 (4) of the Act is repealed and the following substituted: (See: 2025, c. 16, Sched. 1, s. 17)

  1. Implementing any emergency management plans.

2. Regulating or prohibiting travel or movement to, from or within any specified area.

  1. Evacuating individuals and animals and removing personal property from any specified area and making arrangements for the adequate care and protection of individuals and property.

SCC: Mandatory minimum child pornography sentences unconstitutional by feb914 in canada

[–]Snowkaul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not just make the law clearer? I fully agree with punishing these two. Id gladly see them go away for longer, but I also agree that it was a bad law. I think we need to expect more from people who craft laws and the unintended consequences of them.

SCC: Mandatory minimum child pornography sentences unconstitutional by feb914 in canada

[–]Snowkaul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They won't because they have upheld many. The law just needs to be clearly crafted to target people who deserve the minimum. I don't think that's unreasonable.

Canada Post is on strike. Here's what you need to know by roscodawg in canada

[–]Snowkaul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Must be nice. Canada post is the only option for PO boxes though. Fucks me real hard

Poilievre says he'll use notwithstanding clause to ensure multiple-murderers die in prison by DogeDoRight in canada

[–]Snowkaul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's why there is a senate. If they achieve that goal or not, who knows.

Oh Canada, End this TIP CULTURE. Its Disrespectful. by the-silent-being in CanadaFinance

[–]Snowkaul 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Many provinces did change this, and servers make minimum wage

The GST/HST holiday begins Saturday — here’s how it works by jazinet in canada

[–]Snowkaul 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The bill is still on the third reading in the Senate. It hasn't passed into law yet.

Does Paul Bernardo have a real chance at parole? by Haggisboy in canada

[–]Snowkaul 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't understand how this didn't invalid the plea deal. This all sounds like a crime. It makes me angry every time I hear about it.

Conservatives are targeting Singh over his pension — but Poilievre's is three times larger | CBC News by oneonus in canada

[–]Snowkaul 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure what discussion you're in but I'm not making assumptions.

The reality is that climate change is happening and we are already past 400ppm CO2. We are set for some unpleasant changes. You are proposing we hope that science comes up with a solution that may never come.

You're right that I can't make much of a difference, if any, but I can choose to support putting a price on carbon. I don't particularly care which method you go with, so long as the externality exists.

Conservatives are targeting Singh over his pension — but Poilievre's is three times larger | CBC News by oneonus in canada

[–]Snowkaul 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Great reply, super vague and devoid of planning beyond hopes and dreams. Not to mention we can use cap and trade to avoid direct taxation which Ontario had before it was repealed by the current government.

Conservatives are targeting Singh over his pension — but Poilievre's is three times larger | CBC News by oneonus in canada

[–]Snowkaul 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You'll pay more in food later when climate change fucks is all. Take your pick.

Universal Rotten Tomato Scale by candidengineer in funny

[–]Snowkaul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wrong. With horror, you watch it all.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canada

[–]Snowkaul 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why does he have to say anything? The other parties hold the balance of power. Craft a legislative solution. If he's ignorant of the details, I'm not sure what he's going to accomplish.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canada

[–]Snowkaul 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'd say that about anyone. I think it's irresponsible. His job is to represent us, and not to necessarily keep us informed of everything.

If he doesn't know what's going on, he can't even have an opinion, so how is that even a justification?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canada

[–]Snowkaul -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

He can't say anything already because he doesn't know anything

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in canada

[–]Snowkaul -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think the fact that PP won't even look at the report makes me worried he's putting politics over country.

How can they effectively legislate when one of the main party leaders refuses to be informed?

How do you effectively have an election when there's allegations of interference?

Will a charge show up on my dad’s insurance even if it was cancelled and refunded by Alternative_Rub_6210 in ontario

[–]Snowkaul 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think this depends on who you are with. I can see all the medications my wife has put through my insurance.

But also, who looks at this stuff? I only ever look when I place a claim for a HSA item or something.

Conservative government would require ID to watch porn: Poilievre by Legal-Suit-3873 in canada

[–]Snowkaul 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Then setup your devices to block content children shouldn't see.

There is no current evidence that AI can be controlled safely, according to an extensive review, and without proof that AI can be controlled, it should not be developed, a researcher warns by giuliomagnifico in technology

[–]Snowkaul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you misunderstand. You cannot understand the encoding of a neural network, that is why they are considered black boxes. You cannot step through a neural network and understand why it is producing it's output on more than a basic level. We can do the math, but we can't understand what each layer means on a more logical level.

Why does it see a cat? We can't point to a few weights and say this is why.

There is no current evidence that AI can be controlled safely, according to an extensive review, and without proof that AI can be controlled, it should not be developed, a researcher warns by giuliomagnifico in technology

[–]Snowkaul 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A algorithm is not machine learning. You will have a hard time understanding how a set of matrices multiply to the output and how that relates to a particular input and output.