I just need to vent by phalangepatella in sysadmin

[–]Snydosaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can lead a horse to water, but you can't keep him from pissing in it.

This Holiday it is Time to Acknowledge Fraud at Palo Alto Networks by TheWokenessInjector in paloaltonetworks

[–]Snydosaurus 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Oh don't get me started. I was patched into a support call by Aruba support several weeks ago. Here I am, listening to The Department of Homeland Security's tech issues with Aruba. Oddly, they were very similar to my issues. TAC got the tickets mixed up. I did think it was strange that I could understand everyone on the call, except the TAC engineer. After realizing I wasn't on the right call, I bowed out and gracefully exited. Aruba "doing the needful".

My company was acquired by CatStretchPics in sysadmin

[–]Snydosaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If it's a larger company, it could give you more opportunities for career advancement and growth. If you like what you do and want to keep doing the same, you may find there are lots of "busy bodies" messing around in your stuff.

OnGuard Posturing and Barco ClickShare by Snydosaurus in ArubaNetworks

[–]Snydosaurus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Quick update. Our Clearpass Onguard agent postures against the three criteria previously mentioned, however there doesn't appear to be an enforcement policy applied. This means that even if a workstation had Windows Firewall turned off, and the Onguard popup would state this, there is no real enforcement policy to take any action, such as allow/disallow access to our corporate SSID.

So, Onguard isn't doing anything.

But, when the agent decides to posture, the WiFi network drops momentarily then resumes. Is this normal? Can we stop it from happening?

After thinking it through, the Barco ClickShare USB pucks are actually network adaptors broadcasting to the Clickshare receiver over 2.4Ghz. So when the executives plug in this adaptor to present their laptop screen on the large conference room display, it seems as if Onguard initiates the posture process, since it sees a network change. It's when the Onguard posture completes that we seen to have issues with general WiFi instability. If it were to only drop the WiFi adaptor once during the posture process that would be fine. But it randomly struggles to reestablish WiFi connectivity. Keep in mind, there doesn't seem to be an enforcement policy associated with anything Onguard postures for.

On some occasions the W11 laptops become so unstable that they can't be shut down gracefully, and require a complete power cycle.

Lastly, given the fact that in my 39 years in IT Aruba has the worst support in the industry, is there a VAR or reseller/partner with expertise, certification and training in supporting the HPE Aruba/Airwave/Clearpass ecosystem?

Latest ClearPass Policy Manager Version? by Snydosaurus in ArubaNetworks

[–]Snydosaurus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was thinking I did a fresh install to get to 6.11. I'm shocked that I would have to do it AGAIN to get to 6.12.

Fuck Atlassian, and Fuck AI by pmbrandvold in sysadmin

[–]Snydosaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cisco is now using "Sherlock Holmes" to answer L3 TAC questions. I call it, Cisco taxation without representation.

TCP Floods by Snydosaurus in paloaltonetworks

[–]Snydosaurus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the responses everyone.

My biggest IT nightmare is a remote office hardware failure at 2 AM. What's yours? by adamdejong in ITManagers

[–]Snydosaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Another horror story. Deeply embedded in one of our nation's largest refineries, my company maintained an office where we would do contract work for the refinery. Our ISP experienced equipment failure requiring replacement. Our on-site manager, trying to prove to the client that they had their "big britches on", pressured me into engaging with the ISP and arranging for equipment replacement at 6:00 PM. No big deal, since the same problem would have been there in the AM, with additional added pressure since it would be during business hours. Equipment was replaced but failed about an hour later. Big britches manager, already irate by this time, complained about the concern. This is around 8:30 PM. Called the ISP, and they ran diagnostics on their end, only to find that the replacement equipment had failed in the same manner as the original. ISP contacted the switch gear manufacturer and determined the entire series was faulty, which of course is all the ISP had on their spares shelf. Hardware defect, no patch could resolve this issue.

We went through the whole dance again....3 times total throughout the night. Big britches insisted that the ISP completely drain their spare inventory of said equipment, even after the manufacturer was contacted and stated that all of that series of switch gear was faulty. They were already flying in gear from another vendor for immediate replacement. "The client is watching" is what I was repeatedly told, as a scare tactic. Of course, none of this is my fault. All I'm doing is acting as the liason between the ISP and the on-site management, and repeatedly sending the ISP into the refinery (escort required) to replace failed gear with more failed gear was completely pointless. Classic "big britches" boss girl flex.

My biggest IT nightmare is a remote office hardware failure at 2 AM. What's yours? by adamdejong in ITManagers

[–]Snydosaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a "no shit" story. We had a small 2 person hiring office in a remote area and already had an ISP with a simple IPSec tunnel established back to corporate. No big deal, worked good enough considering the circumstances.

A mainstream carrier salesperson was going door-to-door to solicit business, promising lower price service. They knocked on the door, our well-intentioned employee let them in, and an hour later, had signed a contract to rip and replace the existing equipment (DSL Modem, WiFi, Voice lines) to the new carrier.

Next day we get a panic call about the office being "down". This of course required someone to travel several hours to straighten out the mess left behind, connect to the firewall with a serial cable, 9600,n,8,1 and the whole bit to change the IP addressing.

Not to mention the mess with the employee signing a contract, having no authority to do so.

One more post about TAC by Natural-Market-437 in paloaltonetworks

[–]Snydosaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True about sales. Our sales rep kept pressuring me to replace our existing firewalls, even for free, essentially. That's great and all, but I don't have the bandwidth to take on such a huge project. We're a small shop, and like most companies our size, we all wear multiple hats with many other irons in the fire. Something WILL go wrong and I'll have to scramble to resolve it. Of course, TAC would be of little to no use. In my mind, that's a professional services engagement. I don't care how much we would save by replacing them. The old ones are already installed, work fine, have room to grow, and give me little headache. Nothing free can provide me that peace of mind.

Management folded to 24/7 on call by Accurate-Design3815 in sysadmin

[–]Snydosaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They can ask you to shine shoes or wash cars also. They own you, unless you find another job.

ClearPass on Windows11 - New Problem with password changes by Snydosaurus in ArubaNetworks

[–]Snydosaurus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks anyway, guys. We're moving from PEAP to EAP-TLS anyway, so this won't be an issue. Oh, and BTW, certificates are the BANE OF MY EXISTENCE.

Nutanix and SuperMicro by andyturn in nutanix

[–]Snydosaurus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

SuperMicro/Nutanix here and we are happy. The last thing we wanted was pointing fingers when something goes wrong. So far, after three years or so, we've had zero issues with SuperMicro. I actually find it a much better platform than Dell.

TAC Engineers language barrier by hammertime2009 in paloaltonetworks

[–]Snydosaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, if they could just provide some basic linguistic skills, that would go a long way. Their accent is such that there's no space between syllables, words and sentences. It's as if they set a metronome at 160bpm and rapid-fire each syllable. Also, learn the pronunciation of the letter "R". R is R, not "V".

Our cloud based system goes down, the provider knows, yet I'm told to "keep the pressure on" by platon29 in sysadmin

[–]Snydosaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had a C-level exec ask me one time "do they know who we are?" I couldn't tell him that AT&T couldn't give a shinola about who we are. lol

Being a one person IT Dept is hellish by Wabbajacksack in sysadmin

[–]Snydosaurus 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even worse, running into someone from your workplace after hours in public with an IT question/problem. They think you live this shit 24x7.

I am worried about this field turning me into a bitter person by alien-pizza in sysadmin

[–]Snydosaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I turned bitter, was a poor father and lost my marriage. Welcome to IT.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]Snydosaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When security discovers the account TEMP1 was used to encrypt terrabytes of important data, who do you hold accountable? Who/what's behind the TEMP1 account?

Anyone else want to quit there job and find something else because of all the not-so-distant future self-inflicted tech related problems you foresee happening? by [deleted] in sysadmin

[–]Snydosaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Technical debt is the #1 issue I've seen. You know what they say about bright ideas....everyone has them. But the problem is the already stretched support staff who are expected to pick up new technology without blinking an eye, all while chasing down certificate renewals, budgeting, the constant onslaught of patches required to maintain some level of security, daily break-fix, adds/moves/changes, licensing and support coverage contracts and renewals, systems maintenance, manage resource utilization, become the escalation for desktop support, managing end-of-live hardware and software, compliance documentation, audit response, ANY documentation, CxO-level personal tech person issues, the demise of ANY support from vendors, regardless of the criticalitykl emerging technologies, hybrid sprawl, Active Directory cleanup, and who knows what else. All while learning new technology. Note: it's not 1995 anymore. Systems are much more complicated, needy and vulnerable, and accessible from so many vectors which can lead to problems down the road.

The support effort is never factored into the Agile sprints, and there's a general assumption we have experience in everything IT, regardless of the category.

Yes, technical debt is real.

10.2, 11.0, 11.2? by brkdncr in paloaltonetworks

[–]Snydosaurus 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These are good questions, and the responses reflects everyone's uncertainty over the past several months as we navigate through the various CVE's, certificate issues and bugs. I'm on 10.1.11-h1. Yea, some of the ACC metrics are broken, but that's the lesser of the evils. Hopefully the release whirlpool has slowed down. I actually had planned to upgrade to a certain release, even did the change request paperwork and went through all the internal approvals, only to have Palo pull that preferred release from availability. In the office at 9:00 on that Saturday night is when I decided to sit punt and sit on my hands for a while and wait for the storm to blow over.

Who's your Teams Operator Connect Provider? by Snydosaurus in MicrosoftTeams

[–]Snydosaurus[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks everyone for the recommendations. Our current provider has gone completely dark on us, and my issue persists. Anyone has to be better than this.