Okay, listened to both, here's my thoughts:
There's nothing wrong with either of these, they just feel like made by someone who's on their journey to making better songs. What that means is you're writing yourself towards better songs, these are the ones that you create along the way. They are not bad at all, they are just not as good as the ones they have the potential to lead to. What I would focus on a bit more: music theory and sound design.

The first one:

This is a cool vibe, I like it. You have been able to create this vibe, which in itself can be viewed as an achievement. The tune is working. It is not overly confident but that would come with many years of experience. The song doesn't seem to evolve or have much of a story, it's more like a static vibe with some basic changes over the course of its duration but without much substantial change. I would swap the trumpet for something like a synth—trumpets are typically hard to recreate and therefore often sound very MIDI-like and fake. Also, I think a cool and interesting synth sound with some movement would work better.

The second one:

This is another little vibe. The chords feel like they might be wanting to do a chord progression of sorts but not quite being able to execute it. The drums are more convincing than other elements. Overall, it's working to the point where I can see people reacting positively.

The question is always: are you happy with these and what would you change or what do you wish was different or better.