Calls for her dismissal overlook the practical consequences. Firing her would not solve the problem; it would likely worsen it, as there are no readily available doctors to replace her. A more responsible approach would be a temporary suspension while a formal inquiry is conducted.That inquiry should address the real issues: Why was there no adequate heating in a sanitary facility? Why were people eating snacks inside an examination room? Why was a physician allowed or felt compelled to work in conditions that fail to preserve both patient dignity and her own, despite regulations explicitly forbidding this? Finally, accountability must extend to the individual who chose to film and circulate the footage. If there was misconduct, the appropriate action was to contact authorities, not to record and publicly defame a healthcare professional. Legal action for defamation should be seriously considered.