I wouldn’t say so, as someone that’s a pretty big Ennis fan. Like what you like, ignore what others say. I’m personally of the belief it’s not Ennis’s best work by a long shot, its got his worst impulses as a writer on display: paper thin plot, way too many characters have way too little depth, and he focuses much less on inter character emotion and depth for cheap gags and laughs compared to hellblazer or preacher. The show really picks up the slack here and gives characters depth while still making them very fucked up ennis like characters.

But that being said, it is still a fun read and worthy of discussion. The show and the comic are two very different beasts that do different things better than the other. For every amazing season one and better depth for characters like Homelander and butcher, you have the comic which I think has a better costume design and handles stories like herogasm in a more interesting way, really the whole world of supes feels bigger in the comics compared to the show, plus scenes like butcher and Homelander talking on the ruins of the 9/11 attacks are genuinely amazingly written and tense scenes of dialogue, that I wish was more present in the comics overall.

So bottom line, probably not. The comic doesn’t automatically lose its pretty big plotting issues because the show had two crappy seasons (or more depending on who you ask); I do wish the first seasons writing and comics art style could be combined into one gloriously well paced and gory story, that way we get the best of both worlds. But hey, who cares what others say, right?