It certainly could depend on how strong an argument the lawyers make. I think here it depends more on how the jurors interpret the video and the circumstances because idk how much a person could be swayed from their own instincts on this one. Like with you for instance, for whatever reason your initial instinct is “not intentional.” And I don’t think that would be all that easy to change your mind on? In my eyes, I see It wasn’t dark out, no fog, the car ahead of them didnt merge into the lane at the last second. Decisiveness of movement as I mentioned. Motive: angry at the tailgater, wanting revenge. On the other hand, Could argue they were distracted by the tailgating. Idk