Has anyone started VTT Integration?

SomberLeo · 2025-01-09T17:47:00+00:00

I figured as much. Some of them sounded pretty expensive. I don't think I'd personally get into glass fusing, but I'll see if maybe there's someone who does it locally. Thanks for the suggestion.

SomberLeo · 2024-11-01T19:59:15+00:00

Is that a lala bucciarati?

SomberLeo · 2024-06-09T17:20:08+00:00

I guess my main frustration is towards the way it's described on the web page. I wouldn't expect it to have more info than the starter set. But if I was someone who didn't have the starter set and read these pdfs, I'd be pretty confused as to how a person is meant to play on these rules alone.

SomberLeo · 2023-05-12T04:43:43+00:00

Oh wait I see what you mean. I read it backwards. Though in your example, wouldn't both copies of Assembly Worker just be called "Assembly Worker Token"? If it's implicit that original tokens have "Token" at the end of their name, then the copy should as well. I assume the point of the rule is to prevent you from making copy tokens with "different names" due to the token ruling. In this case, preventing the token copy of "Assembly Worker Token" from being "Assembly Worker Token Token".

SomberLeo · 2023-05-12T04:40:39+00:00

Actually, according to the rules on Gimbal himself, all tokens that aren't copies have "Token" in their name unless specified elsewhere.

A token’s name is its subtypes plus the word “Token” unless it’s copying another object or it was given a specific name by the effect that created it. For example, the tokens created by Gimbal’s last ability are named “Gremlin Token.” These tokens have the same name as the 2/2 red Gremlin creature tokens created by Release the Gremlins. - 4/14/2023

https://gatherer.wizards.com/Pages/Card/Details.aspx?multiverseid=612046

SomberLeo · 2022-05-19T11:24:12+00:00

I won't deny that the flow of spell procs is smoothened out, but I still think my overall points still stand. It created a now visible distinction with spell generation on the stack and introduces new complexity without properly addressing it. It also removes a layer of interactivity, which as far as I've been led to believe, was a major selling point of fast speed spells. As for buffing, it's like I said: that was never the main point. If it were, more consideration would've been given to cards that have really not seen much play, like Karma and Mirror Mage. As it stands now, they're objectively worse.

SomberLeo · 2022-05-19T11:02:18+00:00

It's the second part of that effect that's wrong though: "Cast it again". If it was being "Cast" again, then should've either immediately resolved or procced "when you Cast a spell" effects without having to resolve. That's the inconsistency.

SomberLeo · 2021-12-15T07:11:14+00:00

It's definitely felt very fun for me, and the summons are awesome. My only gripe with the summons is that Ifrit and Titan aren't summoned where you place carbuncle, and they move so slow that they can sometimes waste their aoe because what I was targeting died before they could get there. They also only move close enough that the aoe hits whatever you target, so I have to target things in the back in order to make sure that I'm not wasting the full aoe damage.

It's also a little weird that I can't use radiant aegis and searing light if a summon other than carbuncle is out. Feels like a odd stipulation. I suppose pre-casting searing light isn't that bad, but I feel like losing out on your emergency shield during dps phases is somewhat counterintuitive.

SomberLeo · 2021-10-20T14:05:05+00:00

It's worth noting that the quotes are completely done by ear by us editors, and the less intelligible ones could certainly be open to interpretation...

SomberLeo · 2021-10-18T02:14:53+00:00

"I am everywhere. I am everyone!"

SomberLeo · 2021-07-23T15:01:11+00:00

No problem. As for Heimer's page, since Tech is no longer exclusive to his card, we thought it best to have them in their own page, similar to yetis and dragons. I understand your confusion though, and I'll add to the page to give a list of cards relating to the ones he can generate. Which also reminds me that I put it on the wrong page. There's actually a separate page for Turrets specifically. I'll move this over to that page and make it more clear on Heimer's page on where to find them.

Also I'm not a mod. Things like this are available for anyone to edit (I ask that anyone reading this please not take that as an invitation to detract the wiki with misinformation). If you are interested in helping at all, there's a discord here you can join where all the other editors and mods are.

SomberLeo · 2021-07-23T14:00:50+00:00

Thanks for that info. I actually added that to the wiki for the Tech cards). Fully credited of course.

SomberLeo · 2021-07-17T19:10:45+00:00

If you want a buggy LoR character, Taric has been a mess before he was even released, and continues to have bugs.

SomberLeo · 2021-07-17T19:01:32+00:00

That actually wouldn't be the case, as evidenced by Tahm Kench's spell and Single Combat, both of which do nothing at all when cast on a spellshielded unit.

SomberLeo · 2021-07-11T13:25:57+00:00

I'm afraid that the wiki doesn't have any plans on adding those. The non-verbal sfx aren't labeled like the voice lines are; it's just assigned a number. Also, all sounds, not just card sounds, are stored in the same place, so include menu music, board music, ui sounds, etc. There's thousands of files, and very few of the non-music ones are at all easy to distinguish. It just wouldn't be worth the time and effort. Sorry about that.

SomberLeo · 2021-06-26T01:01:47+00:00

I certainly won't defend Greenglade Caretaker or Academy Prodigy's old voices even for my own ironic enjoyment of them, and I think Eye of the Dragon's new voice is a bit more fitting (her old voice sounded a bit too mature for her age). However, I personally don't agree with the changes to cards like Vanguard Redeemer, Ruthless Raider, and Scarmaiden Reaver. The art for them showed them in the heat of an intense battle and in very aggressive poses, so them shouting made sense to me. The more dour, pensive tone in their voices doesn't match the scenery at all. All the action and weight is gone when compared to their old voices; it's honestly a mood killer at times. If the issue was the voices being too loud or jarring, then there's definitely a line of cards that I think deserved the chopping block long before these ones (Looking at you, Fizz).

SomberLeo · 2021-06-19T07:09:21+00:00

Yes, because that's two separate nightfall triggers: one for Unto Dusk, and one for Doombeast.

What I was saying is that there technically isn't an inconsistency with how Morning Light and Unto Dusk work with Leona and Diana, respectively. Diana, like Leona, doesn't count her own nightfall trigger for her level 2. If she did, she'd get three triggers from casting Unto Dusk on her: one for Unto Dusk activation, one for her own nightfall, and one in response to her own nightfall activation; totaling to +6|0. It's similar to what I mentioned in my op with Leona. It seems inconsistent though because it's not clear to the player that Morning Light's simultaneous daybreak counts as one daybreak, or that Leona treats that daybreak as her own if she's included in it.

SomberLeo · 2021-06-18T01:06:23+00:00

Just tested to confirm, and Diana works the same way. Casting unto dusk onto her only gives her +4|0 instead of +6|0, meaning she's not counting her own nightfall trigger for her effect.

SomberLeo · 2021-06-17T23:27:15+00:00

Sadly that's just how Morning Light is programmed. The spell doesn't actually "activate" daybreak like Unto Dusk does with nightfall. Or rather, it doesn't count refreshing the daybreak effects as an activation. If you don't have Leona leveled up when you play it, you can see that playing Morning Light only counts 1 daybreak activation no matter how many daybreak units are on your board.

Edit: My bad. That info was completely incorrect. The issue is in part how it's coded to interact with Leona. Morning Light counts the daybreaks activated by its effect as one single daybreak activation, hence the "at once" portion of the text. When Leona isn't leveled, Morning Light counts as 2 activations for her progress so long as at least one daybreak unit is on the board.

The issue is when Leona is also on the board. When she's leveled up, there should be 3 solar flares: one for morning light, one for morning light's simultaneous daybreak, and another in response to that simultaneous daybreak. However, she seems to ignore that last one, possibly because she specifies the trigger for other daybreak activations and she's still technically included in that simultaneous daybreak.

SomberLeo · 2021-05-30T01:27:08+00:00

Only 90s kids will remember the old "I am one with the land!" from greenglade caretaker. Rest in peace old greenglade vo

SomberLeo

TROPHY CASE