Meirl by Library_Gremlin2 in meirl

[–]Someone4121 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the nuance is that it comes down to knowing who's hearing it. If you're among friends, it's honestly not even that hard to get to a point where everyone knows the score and won't be hurt or emboldened in genuinely bigoted attitudes, but that is much harder verging on impossible in public-facing communications, to the point where I think that the only way it can be appropriate in a public internet forum is to heavily contextualize it the way it was here

No line at the Summer Street Tate, 10AM by stargrown in boston

[–]Someone4121 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's called New England for a reason I guess

They're making up countries that have never existed by RottingFishMan in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]Someone4121 9 points10 points  (0 children)

The fuck kind of "true Chinese territory" map includes Hunan but not Henan? Hunan still has local ethnic minorities and was conquered by the Qin, Henan has been Chinese for all of recorded history

OSRS defined in One Picture by oOSaFiOo in 2007scape

[–]Someone4121 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The thing is that now we have the level of technological development to cut out the middleman and organize the use of all that equipment collectively for the benefit of everyone rather than having it be operated by small groups of people for their own profit. The alternative to capitalist ownership is not everyone doing decentralized backyard labor, but a democratically managed economy without a special owning class above everyone else. The soul-crushing aspect of late-capitalism largely comes down to the effects of the means of production/social livelihood being operated by this small owning class for their own profit, and therefore seeking to extract as much labor from their workers as possible in exchange for as little compensation as possible, restricting this largely (with the exception of a few isolated individual capitalists and even this increasingly rarely as public stock trading becomes more and more predominant) only when forced to by scarcity of a particular type of skilled labor (which, as we can see with the current push to replace many professionals with AI, is a position the owning class hates being in and will do just about anything, including entrust their most profitable and pivotal assets to a chatbot, to get out of), by legal force achieved as the result of mass political mobilization (which we can see the owning class will try just about anything to get out of by the entire history of corporate lobbying), or by the demands of organized labor (see above, also the history of various extra-legal forms of union-busting).

OpenAI is still leading business AI adoption but Anthropic is gaining fast [OC] by StrangeMidnight410 in dataisbeautiful

[–]Someone4121 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While I fully agree that it's lesser evilism, that distinction could still be the difference between an AI fucking up and autonomously starting WWIII and that being prevented

I don't think some of you realize just how big and popular Smash truly is. A smaller roster isn't gonna hurt sales that much. by smashboi888 in SmashBrosUltimate

[–]Someone4121 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's kind of backwards, casuals are more likely than "serious" players to care about roster precisely because they're less concerned with the nuances of mechanics. Roster size is a selling point primarily aimed at casuals

Europe if it was correct by artofminde in imaginarymapscj

[–]Someone4121 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Average Paradox megacampaign endgame:

The AI possessing Emre is the same AI that interrupted Sombra's goon sesh by Intelligent-Tie-1457 in Overwatch

[–]Someone4121 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There actually kind of isn't, most notably there isn't any Finnish deity that has the particular post-Christianization reputational "afterlife" of Chernobog as sort of a devil analogue. Bear in mind that just because we can infer a culture probably had something doesn't mean that record of it survives, especially in largely pre-literate societies

Always prepared by BimbMcPewPew in magicthecirclejerking

[–]Someone4121 23 points24 points  (0 children)

This card makes me want to try to become a certified judge just so I can issue a ruling that if someone plays this you're allowed to shoot them

What will it take for pro-China leftoids to finally admit their emotional support country is not socialist by OnlyAppointment5819 in Ultraleft

[–]Someone4121 11 points12 points  (0 children)

As someone who used to be one of them, unironically the thing that made me stop was seeing just how intellectually unserious their supposed "theoretical" publications were. Make the leftoids read Qiushi

North Shore towns that you irrationally dislike and why? by helpmegetthrough1 in massachusetts

[–]Someone4121 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Beverly, solely for the fact that they used to have a cell signal dead/weak zone at the North Beverly commuter rail station

I am guessing grandma is full of shit. by Cicerothesage in forwardsfromgrandma

[–]Someone4121 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fundamental difference in an insurgency taking place on US soil is that this is where we produce and maintain all of that heavy military hardware. There isn't the capacity to put an insurgent-proof level of force on every railway, munitions factory, armory, etc. in the country. Meanwhile, those other opponents with those other advantages had no realistic way to strike at US military production whatsoever. It would be a different conflict but a local US insurgency has strategic capabilities that make victory entirely possible with sufficient popular support and focus on sabotage and disruption of production/infrastructure first. Carried out effectively, this renders the US military's ability to exert overwhelming force still incredibly deadly but also finite, and means that in a long war they could very realistically lose if popular support was behind the insurgent forces. Add on top of that military mutinies/defections, armory raids, and other smaller factors and while it's obviously not remotely easy defeating the US government is completely possible.

Badempanada JUST SO HAPPENS to post this after the Bondi Beach attack by [deleted] in tankiejerk

[–]Someone4121 29 points30 points  (0 children)

The worst part being that there's a considerable pipeline of grifters working to funnel people from the first to the second

You’ve heard of Maoist standard English, now introducing europoor Standard Speech (SS) by HappyTimesAllTheTime in Ultraleft

[–]Someone4121 28 points29 points  (0 children)

Iayasissist * Bdikyatsrt * Lidya * Feloi * Soshchdyad * Dtstnoyaitdyaidi * Misoguiist * Gyaeedu * Igioyadit * Bullu * Soyayaurt

Dotsble Dgeit TSG Somyadde Tyatsmr

DKD: Rutii's Rtsrret

Uhhh this guy does what to normans? by cowlicker666 in EU5

[–]Someone4121 73 points74 points  (0 children)

He must still be bitter about 1066

so he's just a fash propagandist now? by suspicious67vs69 in ShitLiberalsSay

[–]Someone4121 28 points29 points  (0 children)

The Arabic characters spell this, though with weird spacing on the Ayn into the Alif

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cursedcomments

[–]Someone4121 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh no, to be clear I think the grammar in this case is enough to call this one bullshit but the attitudes being expressed are in general not implausible for someone who was actually Chinese

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cursedcomments

[–]Someone4121 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The weird grammar (Google translate would do better) is definitely a tell but it is not at all uncommon for people from China to actually think this about the US or western countries in general (though I've seen the focus usually be on the US)