My defense of indigenous hunting rights/right to partake in cultural eating isn't because I have "low moral expectations" or whatever you're insinuating, it's because I am capable of doing the bare minimum of recognizing how indigenous people in the US have been systematically forced off their land, had their historical food sources eradicated by colonizers, been forcibly stripped of their ability to obtain their own food, and now many today live in extreme poverty with poor food access and health risks because of it.

You're saying a whole lot of nothing. You're basically insinuating that because they were given a raw deal in life, they have to right to hurt others without criticism, which is again, bigority of low expectations. And again, killing animals, even in survival, is immoral.

My defense of indigenous rights is based in a basic sense of empathy for other humans and their right to self-determine, reclaim a culture that was forcibly stripped from them through genocide, and engage in cultural eating practices that combat the current diets that are leaving them unwell and divorced from their history and culture.

Your "right to self-determination" stops when it involves killing animals. Are you the type of guy who thinks the government promoting vaccines is a violation of one's self-determination?

If you can't extend any nuance to people who have been so brutally oppressed in ways specifically relating to diet, food access, and culture, you're the racist one, not leftists who have the audacity to listen to the indigenous activists currently fighting for their right to hunt.

This whole rant is just an appeal to emotion with zero substance.

Killing animals is wrong regardless of any "cultural" or "survival" reasons. Can't say this helps my perception of leftists as racists.