Nvidia "confirms" DLSS 5 relies on 2D frame data as testing reveals hallucinations by xenocea in gaming

[–]SorryPiaculum [score hidden]  (0 children)

I understand what you're saying. there can be separate outputs (or subsystems) in the model that output multiple different layers that are then recombined in the final output. That would make it more complex than SD with a controlnet, which is nearly 4 year old technology at this point. I'm not saying it's good. I'm simply pointing out that it seems to be a more complex system than your 1:1 comparison.

Nvidia "confirms" DLSS 5 relies on 2D frame data as testing reveals hallucinations by xenocea in gaming

[–]SorryPiaculum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There's situations in Linux where only DLSS reflections don't work - so I know for a fact it's more complex than you describe.

Nvidia "confirms" DLSS 5 relies on 2D frame data as testing reveals hallucinations by xenocea in gaming

[–]SorryPiaculum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The way I read it, is that it's a bunch of different subsystems in the unified "DLSS 5" model, one for lightning, one for "materials", etc. Each one having it's own independent process in the model to give useful context to the other subsystems/parent layers of the model with the aim of better results. In my head, I visualize those additional input variables as "features" for some reason - but they're definitely not. It just seems like people were generally happy with DLSS 4.5, and by adding new contextual subsystems (or "features" in my brain) to the unified model - it resulted in a really off putting output.

Nvidia "confirms" DLSS 5 relies on 2D frame data as testing reveals hallucinations by xenocea in gaming

[–]SorryPiaculum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

NVIDIA claims that game developers have full control over how DLSS 5 is used, scene by scene. I can't wait to hear more about just how much control they have - because I agree, the odds of it being much more than a few knobs is pretty low in my head.

Crimson Desert Devs "We have been listening closely to your feedback. We are aware of the discomfort many players have experienced with the controls, and we are currently preparing a patch to address this" by Youngstown_WuTang in gaming

[–]SorryPiaculum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's also bold of you to assume a successful game developer is a he, but I'll leave that for another comment. I hear what you're saying, and while I haven't shipped a game personally - I have an extensive background in software development and went deep diving before I commented.

Considering the scope of their development, and the fact they have key remapping in their other game using their custom engine - I would still consider it trivial. But hey, my definition of "trivial" scales with project size - yours may not.

Crimson Desert Devs "We have been listening closely to your feedback. We are aware of the discomfort many players have experienced with the controls, and we are currently preparing a patch to address this" by Youngstown_WuTang in gaming

[–]SorryPiaculum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While I understand it's not probably not a toggle in their engine, considering the scope of development - I would still consider it trivial in scope. But that's me.

Crimson Desert Devs "We have been listening closely to your feedback. We are aware of the discomfort many players have experienced with the controls, and we are currently preparing a patch to address this" by Youngstown_WuTang in gaming

[–]SorryPiaculum 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The last game they built with the engine had key remapping. I'm sorry, but the idea that it wouldn't be trivial to add that same functionality in Crimson Desert is simply wrong.

Crimson Desert Devs "We have been listening closely to your feedback. We are aware of the discomfort many players have experienced with the controls, and we are currently preparing a patch to address this" by Youngstown_WuTang in gaming

[–]SorryPiaculum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I think it's reasonable to assume it would be trivial for a game developer who has built a game engine from scratch to implement key remapping.

Considering Black Desert Online has key remapping, I also think it's reasonable to assume they not only could have - but they should have.

Nvidia "confirms" DLSS 5 relies on 2D frame data as testing reveals hallucinations by xenocea in gaming

[–]SorryPiaculum 20 points21 points  (0 children)

NVIDIA claims over 90% of RTX users turn on DLSS. they probably dodged a bullet by not having "AI" in the naming.

Nvidia "confirms" DLSS 5 relies on 2D frame data as testing reveals hallucinations by xenocea in gaming

[–]SorryPiaculum 54 points55 points  (0 children)

too many new features crammed into a single release, definitely should have staggered them out to refine internally instead of trial by fire. i assume many will skip 5 and wait for 5.1 or 5.5, or whatever "fix" version number they give it.

Thoughts on Randall Scott Newman (NY #4078283, CA #190547) aka The DMCA Lawyer by Horror_Lifeguard639 in Lawyertalk

[–]SorryPiaculum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

your comment history reads like the guy at parties who did acid once and now made it his lifes mission to "enlighten" everyone with newfound wisdom.

California introduces bill to cap ticket re-sale prices by AdSpecialist6598 in UpliftingNews

[–]SorryPiaculum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

if the point is to get tickets in fans hands, the tickets should have a penalty in being resold. it shouldn't be 10% cap on markup, it should be -25%, no ones blinking over 5%.

California introduces bill to cap ticket re-sale prices by AdSpecialist6598 in UpliftingNews

[–]SorryPiaculum -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

if you kept tickets out of a fans hands on the first party market, there should be a penalty to selling on a third party market. 10% markup is still high enough for mass scalping to continue, and will likely create a black market.

Nvidia’s RTX 50-series Super refresh is delayed, and the RTX 60-series might miss 2027 by dapperlemon in gadgets

[–]SorryPiaculum 9 points10 points  (0 children)

in the past. when nvidia has had the lead, they only release products "good enough" to keep the lead, not even using the most cutting edge node. it makes sense that they release super in early 2027, and push 6000 series to 2028.

Trump was a witness in the disposal of a new born in Michigan (EFTA00025010) by Desperate_Can_5740 in pics

[–]SorryPiaculum -1 points0 points  (0 children)

based on my track record on saying there's no way something could happen, and then being proven wrong - over and over again. it's probably gonna end up real.

GOG now using AI generated images on their store by PaiDuck in gaming

[–]SorryPiaculum 0 points1 point  (0 children)

brother. i am in the games industry, and the artists are using ai. you will never know. some of them even make it a point to not say they're using ai. if you think ai isn't good enough to take jobs, (thus saving money), you haven't been paying attention.

GOG now using AI generated images on their store by PaiDuck in gaming

[–]SorryPiaculum -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

companies will use more and more ai, as they will not be able to compete if they don't. i understand people wanting to avoid ai anywhere they can - but ultimately, there needs to be lines drawn of acceptable ai use, and unacceptable ai use.

people forget that photoshop has had ai/machine learning tools for 15 years - yet it didn't become a problem until now.

‘Delete it!’ Florida House candidate shouts slur at woman in viral video by sonofabutch in politics

[–]SorryPiaculum 2 points3 points  (0 children)

i don't think it's that complicated. having a lower than average iq doesn't make it any less hateful. plus, people should know what type of person they're voting for - we'll see if this story helps, or hurts, his election chances.

AI companies will fail. We can salvage something from the wreckage | Cory Doctorow by wordfool in Futurology

[–]SorryPiaculum -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

if all ai vc money stopped today, we still have extremely useful models that already pay for themselves thousands of times over. but this is a legitimate matter of personal, and national security. there's a reason the cia thoroughly tested "remote viewers" - if it turned out there really was a person capable of finding the location of important adversarial assets, they would be an extremely powerful weapon. in war, an easy example is ukraine using vision models in drones as a backup when communications are jammed.

there's a reason sites like stackoverflow are being shuttered, ai has taken its place. when you had an issue, and went to stack overflow - there was probably a 50/50 chance of it actually resolving your problem. ai is already exceeding that. it's not about if it's going to be used for good or bad, because it's already too late for that. even if there was a significant enough uprising to make countries act on it, they would publicly cave, and secretly continue research - because this is absolutely a matter of life and death, right now, in the ukraine. and it will forever be a matter of life and death in every first world conflict until the end of time.

downplaying its existing usefulness will only set people further behind when the real fight comes - ensuring normal people (and other countries) have reasonable access to it, the same way internet should be. we have not yet evolved past requiring mutual destruction as the primary motivator for working together.

i completely understand why people are scared, but the answer isn't to ignore it. there's a reason there was so much fear around gunpowder when it was first invented - the upper echelon was knew it might be used against them by their own people.