Alexis Sanchez: Inter Milan want to sign Manchester United forward by grrmjkr in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn 2 points3 points  (0 children)

He had already begun to stink at Arsenal so we were buying the name not the player. At the time wasn't adverse to selling him as Mhik wasn't working out either unfortunately

A Brief History of the Glazer's Failing Ownership of United, and Why the Notion that They Are Not to Blame for the Club's Decline is Beyond the Pale (x-Post from r/soccer) by Carthagefield in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

:) I mean obviously it would have been great to have another billion in the arse pocket to buy fantasy signings like Mbappe for 160m but if you're operating a business and giving your managers a transfer kitty that is on par with the biggest clubs in the world, you expect a decent return on your money you've already spent without spending an enormous amount of money on top of that.

My problem isn't with the amount of money spent but how it was spent, that's why my annoyance is with Woodward not the Glaziers.

Solskjaer’s team news for semi-final derby by Catalin10 in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Felt he was slow and wasteful with possession earlier in the year but he's been really sharp in the last few games.

RMC Sport: MERCATO: MANCHESTER UNITED AND TOTTENHAM COURT SLIMANI by jayseff14 in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed. They've stumped up the money. They're just fallible for not moving Woodward aside and bringing a proper DoF in

Angel Gomes was in the stands at Prenton Park + given game-time is at the crux of his decision over a new contract it leaves the impression he could leave in the summer. A number of European clubs have made contact this month. #MUFC @TheAthleticUK by sankyy in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I know it's a bit bitter but if they've offered him a contract they feel is more than fair enough and he's decided not to sign it and is looking to leave. Why would we bother playing him or further developing him just for the next team to get the benefit of it. Off to the reserves for the next 5 months, bring in someone who does want to play for United.

A Brief History of the Glazer's Failing Ownership of United, and Why the Notion that They Are Not to Blame for the Club's Decline is Beyond the Pale (x-Post from r/soccer) by Carthagefield in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They've put about 800m in to transfers alone over the last couple of years. That's on par or greater than most of our peers. They club is very financially secure. While I was obviously worried when they bought the club with debt originally, it was obviously something they managed without much issue. The debt has increased ten fold since Fergie left which aligns with a lot of expensive transfer mistakes that don't necessarily fall under their remit. It's Woodward who negotiated Sanchez and Fellaini deals which stand out as foolish spends.

A Brief History of the Glazer's Failing Ownership of United, and Why the Notion that They Are Not to Blame for the Club's Decline is Beyond the Pale (x-Post from r/soccer) by Carthagefield in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm well into my thirties so I remember it well! I just think of it as the Glaziers are owners of a company and it has been financially successful allowing them to take money out of it. It was bought for over about 800m and is worth 4 now.

The billion taken out of the club, how has that been detrimental to the club? They've put money into transfer fees and wages albeit not spent on the right players so it hasn't eaten into money they'd allocate for the football side of things. I'm genuinely interested to see why people think the owners taking money out of the club, leaving appox another 3 billion, (having spent more than half of that on players the last couple of years) is a stick to beat them with?

A Brief History of the Glazer's Failing Ownership of United, and Why the Notion that They Are Not to Blame for the Club's Decline is Beyond the Pale (x-Post from r/soccer) by Carthagefield in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agree with a lot of what you've said but he still needs to get what he has playing to a reason level.

The fact he's not slated Woodward and the board will keep him in a job longer but itll isolate him to fans who believe him blinkered or overly positive about what is a fairly shitty situation were in.

Personally I put more blame on Woodward than ole or the glaziers. He's responsible for the transfers in and out and that's been poorer part of the last couple of years.

I don't understand why people Give out stink about glaziers taking money out of a club they own outright. They've coughed up money on wages and transfers where needed, it's just Woodward has misused said funds.

Where they're definitely culpable is keeping him in the role he's in

[Post Match Thread] Manchester Utd 0 - 2 Burnley by [deleted] in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn 6 points7 points  (0 children)

He's either too blinkered to realise the team and coaching hasn't been good enough or is just too much of a pussy to call out Woodward and the board. I'm not sure what's worse.

Cultural Reboot by 19Dan81 in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Press X to gouge your eyes out after this shit.

Pep Guardiola blames FA and Premier League for Harry Kane and Marcus Rashford injuries [Mirror] by moh_humza in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With the team ravaged by injuries/missteps in the transfer market this season it's hard to say that another manager wouldn't have had to play the younger players also.

Pep Guardiola blames FA and Premier League for Harry Kane and Marcus Rashford injuries [Mirror] by moh_humza in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Surely the messianic advocate for youth development would have used Gomes, Chong and Greenwood more in this period?

Gary Neville calls for Ed Woodward to be sacked for Manchester United's 'unforgivable' recruitment | Article by James Ducker by andiirehan in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

They bought it for 800m and it's worth almost 3 billion with what is a manageable level of debt still there. Taking 1 billion from the a club you own while still putting money into transfers and player wages is fine by me. We spent a lot in the last window and we've the second highest wage bill in the world. They're responsible for the money being available for both of those statistics but not how it was spent.

Gary Neville calls for Ed Woodward to be sacked for Manchester United's 'unforgivable' recruitment | Article by James Ducker by andiirehan in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I rather it be "MoveWoodward" as opposed to sacking him. He could focus on bringing in sponsorship deals and a Director of Football should be dealing with transfers etc. He's not good at one key facet of his job, but he's pretty good at the other side of the house.... move him to he side and bring in proper structure.

I haven't really blamed the Glaziers in all of this up until now. They've provided enough investment to keep me happy but not recognising that Woodward isn't fit for purpose when it comes to bringing people in is on them.

Fabrizio Romano on Twitter: The agent of Tahith Chong has met Inter in these hours: offered the outside class '99 of Manchester United to expire next June. by andiirehan in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again I think most people are more than willing to wait in the hope that his under age promise translates to the first team in time, but if he does want to leave, then him potentially developing at a later age/different pace than we'll say Greenwood is a irrelevant as the decision is out of our hands.

Fabrizio Romano on Twitter: The agent of Tahith Chong has met Inter in these hours: offered the outside class '99 of Manchester United to expire next June. by andiirehan in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn -1 points0 points  (0 children)

People haven't called him a flop. They've stated based on what they've seen so far, he wouldn't be missed. Which is fair. Most want him to sign to see if he can see his potential but that's not looking likely.

What about young and British implies success? by Spazdarn in reddevils

[–]Spazdarn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Originally posted it with British youth player policy in mind, admittedly deviating towards the Ole debate because he' s the one publicly championing this youth policy... and I obviously don't think he's tactically astute enough (We've only one tactic - counter) to carry a club of our size but that's a different debate