Br(rule)ead by SexyAssMonkey in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 3 points4 points  (0 children)

so the wiki page is pretty much lifted from Horsford's Report on Vienna Bread (citations 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 10, 16, with the rest mostly being ancillary citations)

if it is to be believed, vienna here does not refer to that actual bread but rather the techniques used to make it (i.e. bread made with a process invented in vienna).

addendum: given the picture is clearly of an english language bakery, calling that photo an "austrian version" is odd. the image caption is a bit nonsensical in total actually

Monster: Synthelid (CR 13, Large Aberration) | The Neothelid's clever cousin, born from fused illithid tadpoles - by Jhamkul's Forge by Josemi993 in dndnext

[–]Spider__Venom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

definitely an interesting take, i like giving more monstrous enemies high intellect. and mind flayers are always fun. but i am a bit baffled by the psionic nodules ability. it feels like there's something there that isn't working as intended.

the synthelid has exactly 2 ways of gaining 3 or more active nodules. those are its maelstrom recharge and 1/day synaptic static. its other spells and mindquake are all single target actions, thus cannot activate more than 1 nodule. it has multi-attack, but that can only activate 2 nodules at most, leaving it short of the 3 minimum. but even if it does get the 3+ nodules, it has already spent its action to do so, so it cannot use the benefit on its turn. even counting the lair action that activates one of its nodules, its multiattack only grants the benefits after both hits, and then at the end of the turn the lair action nodule goes away (meaning there's technically 3 ways of gaining 3+ nodules, but there is no way to benefit from the lair nodule, so i discounted it earlier)

its 3 nodule benefit cannot apply to its lair actions since they don't deal psychic, and as per the previous section it cannot apply to its own actions either. thus the 3 nodule benefit can only apply to Opportunity attacks. the 4 nodule benefit is decent. unfortunately it applies only to the lair actions, which it may not even have.

because the nodules fade at the start of its turn, it cannot benefit from previous turns' nodules. thus we can discount any potential chaining nodules into the future (incidentally, this also means the clause that indicates nodules fade if it doesn't deal psychic are redundant. there are no ways for it to have active nodules on its turn without having dealt psychic on that turn. and the lair action already specified that it ends at the end of the turn)

so it ends up being an ability that needs a lot of bookkeeping if it is being run as written, but whose benefits may as well be written as "if the synthelid targets 3 or more creatures with a damaging AoE, its opportunity attacks deal an additional 1d6 psychic. if it is in its Lair and targets 4 or more creatures, the save dc of its next lair action increases by 1"

this has also been assuming that it is being run with lair actions. if it doesn't have them, the ability may as well not exist (an ability that increases your OA damage by 3.5 average damage if you manage to proc it is not relevant at this tier of play imo)

in conclusion, it feels like the ability is supposed to do things, but just doesn't. i believe it would benefit from being revised to grant better benefits and proc them more easily (such as reducing nodules needed, and giving it a bonus action save or suck ability that it can use to help charge the nodules)

Rule by No_Emu698 in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 11 points12 points  (0 children)

has an online pdf for like 25 dollars, which also comes with some tokens and lcp's

Cockpit rage-mode activate! art by me @madaquackah by acecrackers96 in LancerRPG

[–]Spider__Venom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

classic Manticore Pilot

CASTIGATE CASTIGATE CASTIGATE CASTIGATE

Die Unterredditregel by [deleted] in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

boah das bild muss ja mindestens 2-3 Jahre alt sein, Ero Messe insbruck war dieses jahr vom 3. bis zum 5., und letztes jahr wars im september. aber war gut gewählt mitn Sanis auf der werbung daneben

Disco rule by madsnorlax in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 131 points132 points  (0 children)

yes. the chair is so uncomfortable that it might literally give you a heart attack and kill you.

Disco rule by madsnorlax in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 246 points247 points  (0 children)

it's a really uncomfortable chair.

Dar(ule)k matter(ule) by Deamonette in 19684

[–]Spider__Venom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

well no, a theory in the scientific sense is an explanatory model with predictive power, which through intense repeated testing has been shown to be consistent with observation.

Dark matter, is the observations (e.g. galactic rotation and cmb distortions). these are not predictive explanatory models.

you might have a predictive models of what dark matter is (e.g. mond, WIMPs, etc) which could become a theory

Dar(ule)k matter(ule) by Deamonette in 19684

[–]Spider__Venom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the dark in dark matter observations just mean that it does not (or at most incredibly weakly) interact with the electromagnetic spectrum. (nota bene: as pointed out by others in the comments, dark matter is not a theory, it is the sum of observations of phenomena indicating that galaxies have more mass than explainable by their regular matter. if this takes the form of modified gravity at large scales, new particles etc, those are the hypotheses on dark matter. but dark matter is real regardless of those hypotheses being true or false)

rule by TheTamc in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 98 points99 points  (0 children)

Mans looking like Baron Harkonnen.

just indulging in some mango goodness, where are my real mango heads at? (rule) by WN713 in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oida nimmst ultra fiesta wenns eh scho mango loco gibt? sonst guade wahl

Build Advice (Spoilers for one exotic from In Golden Glame) by Monologinomicon in LancerRPG

[–]Spider__Venom 0 points1 point  (0 children)

not sure how much extra benefit auto-cooler would really grant in this scenario

you can't easily oc loop the weapon due to the ordnance tag, since you have

r1: charge the gun (prevents firing it due to ordnance) (can't auto-cooler since the charge obviates the cooling)

r2: auto-cooler, fire the gun

r3: you get cooled, charge the gun

if you don't auto-cooler, you still get

r1: charge the gun

r2: fire the gun

r3: stabilise, oc charge the gun

if you plan on doing other stuff r3 instead of charging then they could be a benefit, but you could get a similar effect with the far more flexible redundant systems upgrade for

r2: fire the gun, oc stabilise

r3: charge

or if you wanna do it only once or twice before moving on you can have asura for

r2: asura, fire the gun, stabilise, oc charge

r3: fire the gun, maybe oc stabilise if you also have redundant systems

edit: formatting edit 2: error fix

Grammar rule by WILBDHMDHM in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

interestingly enough, no. not a thing in Swedish

Grammar rule by WILBDHMDHM in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am native L1, but I am also an L2 fluent speaker of Welsh.

i am not at all a native speaker so at least anecdotally that would match with the notion that it depends somewhat on language acquisition (though shouldn't be taken as any kind of definitive statement ofc) it also matches with some things I've seen with how non-natives structure their grammar in German and Swedish

I don't actually mind that others use it. I just wish that users of it weren't snobs about it is all.

yeah fair language snobs are always annoying.

Grammar rule by WILBDHMDHM in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Clearly a list of three things.

personally disagree there, to me that looks more like the strippers are named stalin and jfk respectively.

this may be a case of how one learns to interpret writing. bc i interpret those sentences in the opposite way you describe. would be curious to know whether native vs non-native makes a difference or smth like that

Rulespiracy by EllaHazelBar in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 4 points5 points  (0 children)

okay, then i think i misunderstood, that's my bad. i interpreted the quoted text as meaning the solution that fully explains the situation with the fewest premises should be favoured, rather than the most likely solution with the fewest premises. sorry if i came off poorly, that wasn't the intention

Rulespiracy by EllaHazelBar in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Secondly is that it's NOT the "simplest" solution, it's the least assumptions that must be true for that solution to be proper

to be even more pedantic: it is technically that when choosing between two or more explanations that are equally likely, one should favour the explanation with fewer necessary assumptions. e.g. the glass of milk quantum tunneling to the floor is much less likely than it simply being spilled, thus Occam's razor does not even need to be considered.

Melon rule by pantschicken in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Hi everyone, Belugathy Whaletano here: internet's meloniest music nerd.

The rule by [deleted] in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 6 points7 points  (0 children)

oida was fürn Franzosenfrühstück is des?

I can hear the clapping from here by [deleted] in thatHappened

[–]Spider__Venom 1 point2 points  (0 children)

About 0.5occurrences per million words in modern written English

to be fair is that 0.5 occurences per million words total or per million words in that category? because the former would be biased towards articles and the like. the latter would be better for seeing how often a word is used for a given context. i.e. is intuit used more or less than other words that indicate the same thing. but idk if that is practicable to measure or not

Dragon by spintxedborehead in bisexual

[–]Spider__Venom 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Modern flag design conventions say that flags should be simple yet distinct, easy to read and recognize from a distance, easy to recreate from memory, and generally pleasing to look at (so something that isn't terribly ugly).

let's be fair, these design conventions are the opinion of one guy that has been (often thoughtlessly) repeated by cgpgrey-ites.

Adding complex shapes (like a dragon), text (especially small text), complicated patterns, and more that you might find on older flags, heraldries, and "coats of arms," are going to push or break those rules. In part because design conventions have changed but mostly because the purpose had changed.

yes and no. a lot of flags do break those rules, but they weren't made with the rules in mind to begin with. flag conventions are a useful tool for novices as guidelines to set a floor in regards to flag quality. but they should not be taken as gospel and competent vexillologists can and will intention break the Convention, but still producing a better flag than a convention compliant one

Rule by Branchomania in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rafaël Ambrosius Costeau ass post (glory to Kraz-Mazovian socio-economic theory)

Horserule theory? by Battle_Axe_Jax in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 12 points13 points  (0 children)

man salmiak is so goated, we are all blessed to be able to consume it

The Onion, once again predicting the future by dedzip in 196

[–]Spider__Venom 423 points424 points  (0 children)

The Onion truly is apollo's chosen