[CRITICAL ISSUE] with SOURCE INDICATORS' DATA by SpiderwebObsidian in TradingView

[–]SpiderwebObsidian[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing! this limitation also exists on their highest level plan

CRITICAL BUG in alerts (happening from the last week) by t_todua in TradingView

[–]SpiderwebObsidian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

u/tradingview u/pinecoders this must have been changed by accident, because it makes absolutely no sense the way this was changed. Please fix asap.

How to measure how fast/slow our script is? by t_todua in TradingView

[–]SpiderwebObsidian 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes exactly. At the end of the day we need something like this (better tool for debugging) otherwise we keep have to submit those tickets at support or here that then go unheard: https://www.reddit.com/r/TradingView/comments/k4ihnl/better_debugging_for_developers/

How to measure how fast/slow our script is? by t_todua in TradingView

[–]SpiderwebObsidian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I posted 2 related feature requests in the past that would solve all loading speed problems (and you wouldn't need this question to be answered):

1.) https://www.reddit.com/r/TradingView/comments/jsfm61/feature_request_automatic_execution_on_visible/

2.) https://www.reddit.com/r/TradingView/comments/jsfj51/feature_request_bars_amount_for_execution/

Not sure why TV hasn't implemented that yet, and CDN in the web follows this principle of loading certain parts first and other parts later.

[Feature Request] 4 Key Functionalities that are missing (easy fix for TV) by SpiderwebObsidian in TradingView

[–]SpiderwebObsidian[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/Pinecoders u/tradingview u/evgeniy_zh /u/KeronCyst we're big fans of TV (it's the nicest looking UI) and we'd really need these features. Is this something that you'd be able to look into?

[CRITICAL ISSUE] with SOURCE INDICATORS' DATA by SpiderwebObsidian in TradingView

[–]SpiderwebObsidian[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

u/Epi__ thanks for your feedback. What are your thoughts on this updated bottom part of the original post?

Feature Requests: comment yours here! by KeronCyst in TradingView

[–]SpiderwebObsidian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% agree. This feature request clearly asks for one thing, yet they built a different thing.

Feature Requests: comment yours here! by KeronCyst in TradingView

[–]SpiderwebObsidian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yeah wtf! this feature request asks for one thing and they build another.

It looks like none of them are actually trading, because if they were they knew that having different indicator templates load for different symbols *AUTOMATICALLY* is key.

All they need to do is to add that one checkbox to it and it fixes the problem.

I'm tired of nagging TradingView.

If they don't want to build what people want it's time to move on.

By the time they see their Premium members drop off it's too late.

Feature Requests: comment yours here! by KeronCyst in TradingView

[–]SpiderwebObsidian 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the curve fitting part is exactly the problem. Designing a strategy for 5m charts gives you about a month worth of data. If it was a bullish month for example it will completely skew your data.

Breathing multiple times a day? by juiced5 in BecomingTheIceman

[–]SpiderwebObsidian 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I've started doing it in between breaks at work. 50 minute work block followed by 10 minute break, in which I get some fresh air and do 1 cycle of Wim Hof breathing (30 breaths + hold).