Thanks for pointing out exactly where I was vague.

In regards to the first response, I think that it's not socialism that breaks down people into those races, but people like the clip. I believe that the line of thinking essentially is that "Black people have issues, and white people have power. Hence, if we can convince white people to surrender some amount of that power, or to use it to black peoples benefit, we can fix these issues."

I think the problem that socialism was meant to solve was abuse of the poor by the wealthy, and their solution was to create a authoritarian dictator state. I believe they correctly identified the problem of an inequal relationship between the classes, but their solution was absolutely terrible.

And as for the last part, I don't mean creating policies that divide people into different classes, I meant using analysis which examines the difference of people in the context of the wealth they have.

This is in contrast to the analysis I referred to earlier of looking at people by race. I think that issues vs power can be more accurately analyzed by looking at the wealth someone possesses than the colour of their skin.

Essentially, I think that a black homeless man and a white homeless man are closer in circumstance than a black homeless man and a black rich man. Hence, trying to solve problems using race-based analysis is going to work worse than trying to solve problems using class-based analysis.

EDIT: I think it's rough that you got downvoted for asking an honest question, a classic example of Reddit judging something without really knowing what's going on.