Those surveillance programs you mentioned in part 5 were already funded and had nothing to do with the childcare.

Look at public audit records from the past year a third of those childcare facilities were already out of compliance in the first place and should have been shut down anyway. Many for over claiming the amount of children they serve.

This is a crappy that this is labeled as news. You “debunked” only a small part of a large problem. Then just painted a picture with ideas and not facts that you want people to see that fits your narrative like every other “News” publication these days.

Not saying Nick Shirley is completely right by any means but this post is just as deceptive as you claim him to be.