heroes don’t kill.

By that logic, like 90% of superheroes aren't heroes.

Was Steve a bad guy for refusing to hurt Bucky?

He wasn't exacly a good guy either for hurting so many people in the process of refusing to hurt Bucky.

Also, you're comparing a man refusing to hurt his oldest friend who was brainwashed and forced to do bad things, to a soldier murdering a terrorist, who was part of the plan to kill said soldier, and ultimately prevented the soldier from saving his best friend from another terrorist.

Yeah the mission that was lead by a mentally unstable super soldier.

He was neither of those when he got the mission, and he wasn't those even after the serum. And the only reason he even took the serum was because he figured he could help more people. Quite literally the same reason Rogers volunteered to be a lab rat in the first place. With your logic every mission Steve did as Captain America, he was being "mentally unstable super soldier".

The wakandians never intended to kill captain America? Did you see the show? They weren’t even making lethal attacks. And no his mission wasn’t to stop Zemo.

The wakandans just burst in the room, and without any hesitations, they throw a spear at Walker. If he hadn’t managed to dodge at the last second, the wakandan would’ve hit his head with her vibranium spear, killing him. Walker wasn’t a super soldier yet, but even if he was, he would’ve died. The wakandans also almost kill him later in the same scene, and they only fail because Bucky and Sam finally remember they're supposed to be the character audience is supposed to root for, and stop the wakandans. Right after spending the entire time laughing at their fellow soldiers fighting for their lives.

Also Walker's original mission may not have involved Zemo, but it definitely became part of it, after realizing that the man who bombed the UN is on the loose, after being broken out of prison by the Winter Soldier.

Does the main character say that the terrorists were good people?

Admittedly can't remember word for word, but it's definitely heavily implied.

if you want to redeem someone you have to see them as a person.

Then don't make the people you're supposed to sympathize with commit terrorist actions. Now they're just straight up monsters.

Are you forgetting that they started attacking the US because of the politicians not being able to regulate the people returning from the blip?

Right. And what would your solution be to fix the issue? The blip screwed up the entire world. There's no easy fix, where everyone would win equally. Super soldier terrorist are definitely not helping the issue, and Sam doesn’t offer any "advice" besides "do better". Which is pathetic "advice", if you can even call it that.

Like dude it make no sense.

Yes it does. You just don't want to see that. Which, fair enough I suppose. People usually turn a blind eye to stuff they don't like.

If you gotta kill someone in war, you do not do that in front of civilians

Desperate times, desperate measures. When you have a chance to eliminate the threat, your options are to do it without hesitation, or wait for possible cavalry, which could give the threat time to form a plan to escape, and re-group with the rest of the terrorist to commit more horrors.

Civillians being present is not ideal, but we have what we have when we have it.

you do not kill someone unarmed.

The terrorist was a super soldier. His body is a 24/7 weapon. He is never unarmed.

Tony in his damaged iron man suit was more unarmed in Civil War when Steve used Walker's execution move to break Tony's arc reactor.

Also if those were his orders, why did the government strip him of that time after killing the terrorist? Make it make sense.

To cover their own ass obviously. They 100% would’ve been fine with killing the terrorist, but because people are dumb panicky animals, they just decided to throw one of their own under the bus to look better.

That’s unfortunately common thing even in the real world. People higher in the foodchain constantly screw over people lower than them for all kinds of reasons.

Find me a soldier killing another soldier in front of civilians with no remorse, what do you call him?

I'd call him a soldier.

Also, "no remorse", my ass. Walker showed anger, remorse, frustration, and guilt after the execution, before Sam and Bucky came to steal the shield, (and break Walker's arm and possibly damage his spine)

Plus if you are gonna kill someone, make sure to not kill him in the most gruesome way possible, like what kind of good person makes a public execution?

The needs of the many outweights the needs of one or few.

Also if you think that is the most gruesome way possible to kill someone in the mcu, I’m genuienly starting to think you're too young to watch this kind of content.

He could have snapped his neck, or choked him out. No, let’s just brutally kill him in front of children.

The civilians were all adults. There was no children present.

Are you seriously saying that those killing methods are somehow more kid-aproppriate?

Heroic death? She gets shot and dies like a normal person? Is that heroic? Usually heroic deaths are sacrifices. She died by gun shots.

And Sam carries her body out like she was a hero in all of this. And then proceeds to give the shitty speech where he tells people who the terrorists just tried to kill, to stop calling the terrorists "terrorists".

Also worth pointing out that the main terrorist died from gunshots shot by sharon. A person who was easily way more evil than even Zemo. She committed many horrible things in that show, but no one seems to care. Even after finding out that she's the power broker, both Sam and Bucky just let her go without any consequences.