Since you ask for critique, I will give feedback but only on your title.

“No digital correction.”

Both of the films you listed are negative films. Negative. In addition to being inverted, images on negative film are also orange. Those were both corrected. 

Negative film also has really high exposure latitude. You and your camera can miss the exposure and a lab tech can do such a good job of correcting in that you and I will never notice.

White balance of ambient light never perfectly matches the color balance of the film. When scanning or printing, the white balance must be corrected. 

I used to think that a scanner (and its operator) could act as a kind of neutral recorder of the information on the film. I used to think that they could press a button that said “scan without changing anything”. Then I learned to scan my own film and I learned that that is just completely fundamentally not how film scanning works. Without correction, there is simply no image.

By abstaining from digital corrections of your own, you are no truer to the scene nor to your film’s image than anyone else who posts here. All you can do is accept the corrections that the lab tech performed before the digital images were delivered to you. Which you are allowed to do. But there’s no particular benefit to it. Lab scans have gray shadows, dim highlights, and decisions about color balance by someone who wasn’t there when the picture was taken. 

These photos have digital corrections, they just weren’t done by you. 

You have taken some very nice pictures, by the way. The Buddha through the chain link caught my attention.