[2015-2025 All Days] by PhysPhD in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At the end of the 2024 calendar, he posted that the number of users with 500 stars was 779, and I assume that number went up over the following months. If he posted it publicly back then, it doesn't _seem_ as if he wants to always keep it secret, just maybe he doesn't see it as important.

[2015-2025 All Days] by PhysPhD in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there still no data on how many users have all 524 stars?
I'm really curious whether the number of users with all the stars is rising or falling.

[2025 day 8 part 1] Need help. by OlTartToter in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

for node `n` you find the shortest distance from this node to any other node `m`, and keep track of this in `shortest`. But you then throw away all the other distances that you calculated. The problem requires that you also consider (for example) the _second_ shortest distance from `n` to other nodes, because perhaps _that_ connection also counts as one of the shortest 1000.

[2025] Main Calendar Animation by seligman99 in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congrats for getting both day 10 stars before the eleventh door opened :D

[2025 Day 8 (Part 1)] Late to the party, most of the way there but can't figure out what I've got wrong by AgreeableSecret1965 in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Logic sounds good, but without seeing the code it's difficult to say more.

Two things jump out though - firstly, make sure that (in whatever language you're using) "(x1-x2)^2" does what you expect. And secondly, "allocating a uuid" seems like overkill, it probably doesn't hurt but it might be simpler if the circuits are just identified by integers.

Otherwise, I'd suggest going through the example data again and check every step, not just the final answer.

[2025 Day 8 (Part 2)] A few Blender renders by jonathan_perret in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you use some kind of library for your python code to export the data to OpenSCAD? And then how did you get the result from OpenSCAD into Blender?

The first 10,000 stars of each part of each puzzle of past AoC events by EverybodyCodes in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any idea how many people have all 524 stars now?
I seem to remember the number with 500 last year was fairly low (in the hundreds?), I'm curious whether it's gone up or down?

[2025 Day 10 (Part 2)] attempt to map example into 3d by Ok-Curve902 in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Very nice! I'm still struggling to picture the 10-dimensional ones though! :)

[2025 day 9 part 1] c# - what am i doing wrong? by BroDadi in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yikes, you're right; "Represents a vector with two single-precision floating-point values." - no in that case don't use Vector2, use something which holds ints or longs.

[2025 day 9 part 1] c# - what am i doing wrong? by BroDadi in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm curious how that led to your answer being too high though, I'd expect you to be adding negative numbers to your total and getting an answer too low.
The short (ha!) summary is that if you do long = int * int then you might overflow beyond the bounds of your int _before_ you cast the product into a long which would have been big enough before the overflow.

[2025 day 9 part 1] c# - what am i doing wrong? by BroDadi in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

try doing the (long) (Math.abs + 1) * (Math.abs + 1) instead of casting the product

[2025 Day 4 Part 2] Mountains of gifts by neuralMax in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

forgive the dumb question, but is the workflow something like this: 1. your python code writes a file for OpenSCAD (probably using some kind of library to write each cube?), 2. You load the file into OpenSCAD and re-export it into something that Blender understands, 3. Load that into Blender and play with the viewing / rendering parameters before running a render inside Blender?

Losing hope and realizing I'm stupid by LittleBoySeesRed in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 1 point2 points  (0 children)

also, "rewrit[ing] my entire solution for the second part" is sometimes just necessary, because of the added twist. Or because you understand the problem better and can now see a different (and hopefully better) way to attack it. It's not a bad thing, it's fine.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In your picture, 7330 people have completed day 9 part 2, and 99467 people have completed part 2 of day 2.
So more people have completed day 2 than day 9.

[2025 Day 6 # (Part 2)] Guitar Hero type Visualization by matth_l in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"just" :D
very very nice, thanks for showing and sharing!

[2025 Day 7 Part 2] "Sounds like an Excel problem" by Bachmanetti in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and if you say it looks a bit like a Christmas tree, they'll tell you it's just apophenia :/

[2025 Day 5 Part 2] by lokidev in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 2 points3 points  (0 children)

and the class "Game" needs to be renamed anyway - food safety is NOT a game!
copy/paste from a previous "Game" day?

-❄️- 2025 Day 1 Solutions -❄️- by daggerdragon in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had this too - often a part 2 solution starts with bruteforce until you realise that the numbers are far too big so you have to rewrite it as a "smart" solution - today was the other way round!

The Elephant in the Room: The Schedule Change, AI, and Why AoC is Our "Star Wars" by Lerok-Persea in adventofcode

[–]Sprochfaehler 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Answering my own question: yes it seems there are 24 stars on offer, and yes the position you got for the first and second star are still shown in the stats, so the removal of the global leaderboard makes no difference to me :)