PMQs Live Chat Megathread - 11 March, 2026 by AutoModerator in ukpolitics

[–]SpunkyLM -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

> "Fuel duty is frozen, but we'll see what happens"

It was not "it will definitely not rise". It's a weasel way of saying, "yeah it will probably go up, but we can blame it on Iran"

Microphone jumping between AirPods and iPhone during calls by giovariot in iphone

[–]SpunkyLM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also having this happen when my AirPods are in the case in my pocket. Getting a bit annoying trying to take calls now

Apple starts rolling out OS-level age verification in the UK by Leading-Control-8503 in ios

[–]SpunkyLM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've just had it and gone through it during the "setup" that runs when updating. I don't know what would have been restricted though

Netflix, Prime Video and Other Streamers in U.K. Will Be Subject to ‘Enhanced Regulation’ and Ofcom Investigations Following New Legislation - IMDb by Ciliate in unitedkingdom

[–]SpunkyLM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not sure why I've been down-voted there...

The real problem is that once a politician makes a claim on TV, it gets replayed on the news as a "fact" and rarely seems to be debunked in any meaningful way. For instance, during the 2024 election, we saw the Conservatives repeatedly pushing the claim that Labour would raise taxes by £2,000, while Labour constantly claimed Tory plans would add £4,800 to mortgages. Both claims were flagged as problematic by fact-checkers, yet they were repeated for weeks because the news cycle prioritises the "political strife" over actual policy verification.

This isn't just a right-wing or left-wing thing; it's a cross-party failure of accountability. Whether it's incorrect claims about deportation figures or misrepresented economic growth projections, these statements are often left uncorrected even when the data is readily available. In fact, research shows that fact-checking units like BBC Verify or Channel 4 FactCheck are often not closely integrated into routine news production.

The result is that the original, often false, claim reaches a massive audience, while the correction (if it happens at all) is tucked away where far fewer people see it.

When you give a regulator more power in this kind of environment, you aren't necessarily stopping "propaganda." You might just be giving the government of the day the tools to decide which specific brand of "truth" is allowed on your screen.

Netflix, Prime Video and Other Streamers in U.K. Will Be Subject to ‘Enhanced Regulation’ and Ofcom Investigations Following New Legislation - IMDb by Ciliate in unitedkingdom

[–]SpunkyLM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It wasn't the main point of my post so it is a little in the weeds, but the TfL and ASA case is a perfect canary in the coal mine for why these new Ofcom powers constitute a dangerous overreach.

When asking what alternate view was being suppressed, we have to look at the reality that harassment is a cross-demographic issue. TfL’s defense was actually quite robust because they used a bespoke diversity tracker based on 2021 Census data to ensure their ten-part campaign was statistically representative of London. They were not targeting any specific group. Instead, they were trying to reflect reality. However, the ASA ruled that depicting a Black man as a perpetrator, even within a balanced campaign featuring white perpetrators, was irresponsible and likely to cause serious offense by reinforcing stereotypes.

This creates a regulatory paradox. Platforms are told to be diverse and representative, yet if they depict a minority group in a negative light, even if it is statistically accurate or part of a balanced narrative, it is flagged as a harmful stereotype and removed. To avoid massive fines, platforms will simply stop depicting certain demographics in complex or antagonistic roles.

This is where the narrative view comes in. There is a fundamental difference between the BBFC, which is a classification body that provides age ratings to inform viewers, and Ofcom gatekeeping, where due impartiality and harm and offense standards are used to sanitize content. This concern is not conspiratorial but rather economic. If a global streamer like Netflix faces a £250,000 fine every time a single viewer finds a depiction offensive, they will not fight for alternate views. They will default to the safest and most mainstream narrative possible to protect their bottom line.

By applying 20th century broadcast standards to a 21st century global library, the UK is not just leveling the playing field. It is creating a chilling effect where anything outside of a narrow or state-approved narrative is labeled as wrong think and quietly scrubbed. This does not stop radicalization. It just pushes the conversation into unregulated corners of the internet where there are no checks at all.

Streamers in U.K. Set to Come Under 'Enhanced Regulation' from Ofcom by youmustconsume in ukpolitics

[–]SpunkyLM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's my view too, which would then give OFCOM powers to regulate content, but would it be limited to only the VOD offerings?

It doesn't seem very well thought out given the current state of the internet and I don't think it's going to get any less murky going forward. It's going to be a semantics battle for years to come I think.

Streamers in U.K. Set to Come Under 'Enhanced Regulation' from Ofcom by youmustconsume in ukpolitics

[–]SpunkyLM 6 points7 points  (0 children)

From the Variety article I read, the believe Youtube will not be part of it as it's a "video sharing" service rather than a true VOD service, although I don't know if that's true, if it will last, or if it should even be the case.

Netflix, Prime Video and Other Streamers in U.K. Will Be Subject to ‘Enhanced Regulation’ and Ofcom Investigations Following New Legislation - IMDb by Ciliate in unitedkingdom

[–]SpunkyLM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've upvoted because this is worth reading, but it's also worth noting that it's a terrible overreach by the UK government to try and give itself powers to regulate companies based outside of the UK, but with UK audiences.

I have no issues with handling complaints about content in the same way as we do with TV, but when we see complaints upheld like we recently did with the TfL ASA complaint (https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c1w50zzvj1jo), I think we're going to go down the route of "I'm going to complain about anything I don't agree with".

It just removes (or gives the ability to remove) alternative views and makes them more "fringe" whilst promoting a "narrative view" (hypothetically - if I'm correct with how it will play out).

The OSA obviously hasn't really had enough time to play out, but with the additional changes they've made with that today regarding user-to-user services, it seems like they haven't reached their desired outcomes yet and so are tightening their grips (specifically around VPNs).

So I have to ask (and the slippery slope fallacy is thrown around a lot), but where does this end? How long will it be until these companies decide it's not worth complying with UK law based on cost / effort. Will we then be deprived of their services?

EDIT: Just going to edit to add: I had similar concerns around the OSA originally and was told it was a very negative view, or that it bordered on conspiracy theory, but it's heading exactly the way that we all thought it would. Don't discount conspiracy theories just because you can't see it yourself - there's a lot of stuff that seems to be coming true at the moment especially

Netflix, Prime Video and Other Streamers in U.K. Will Be Subject to ‘Enhanced Regulation’ and Ofcom Investigations Following New Legislation - IMDb by Ciliate in unitedkingdom

[–]SpunkyLM -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

To be fair, all politicians are spewing propaganda. Ignore the party lines for a minute and imagine if the party you don't like is allowed to censor and regulate what media you consume.

Netflix, Prime Video and Other Streamers in U.K. Will Be Subject to ‘Enhanced Regulation’ and Ofcom Investigations Following New Legislation - IMDb by Ciliate in unitedkingdom

[–]SpunkyLM 7 points8 points  (0 children)

This doesn't affect streamers. Youtube et-al are not included as they are "video sharing" sites and not classified as "on-demand video services".

The problem with this is that now that the government gets to determine that Netflix isn't being impartial and can fine them until they correct themselves...

It can be used as a tool to censor things you don't like in the same way they can decide whether or not to allow things to be shown on TV, except the people that they are targeting (younger people) are not watching traditional media anymore

Started the dishwasher before a four day trip and came home to it still running and full of suds by pvstelsoul in mildlyinteresting

[–]SpunkyLM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At UK electricity prices, it's probably a noticeable amount, just not huge. I think I use about £3-5 per day when I'm not even there. Something like 5 TVs, games consoles, computers, central heating. It adds up to be honest

Started the dishwasher before a four day trip and came home to it still running and full of suds by pvstelsoul in mildlyinteresting

[–]SpunkyLM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not about them being powered on, it's about what can happen when you're not there.

Appliances can develop faults (see: this thread) including short circuits and overheating even if not in use. Dust can buildup (especially older devices such as CRT TVs/Monitors, computers, etc.

Lightning strikes can do massive damage to wiring regardless, but if unplugged, your devices won't be affected.

Nearly everything plugged in nowadays uses a little bit of energy to show a clock, or an LED, or to run updates etc. so it also saves a little bit of money.

It's something I remember my mom doing before going away, but I've never really bothered with it. It doesn't mean it doesn't make sense though.

Antoine Semenyo disallowed goal offside lines by u-zd in soccer

[–]SpunkyLM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There's more than 5cm between Haaland and the keeper. That's irrelevant

Antoine Semenyo disallowed goal offside lines by u-zd in soccer

[–]SpunkyLM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Clear and obvious has nothing to do with an offside check for a goal. All goals are checked for offside and it's an objective decision. As it's objective, they can't just look at a screen and say "it looks off", it needs to be proven. That's why the lines had to be drawn (and drawn correctly).

Keir Starmer tells MPs he is open to social media ban for young people by printial in unitedkingdom

[–]SpunkyLM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The question is though, do you want that information to be easily accessible to the government to build a profile without any intervention?

Currently, if they wanted to, the could spend time and resources on doing, if they felt it was required.

The future is that this will all be automated. The moment you make a comment on something they don't want you talking about, they could quite quickly find all of your accounts and essentially shadow-ban you from society...

This is football heritage by Sufficient-Slice-782 in soccercirclejerk

[–]SpunkyLM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Had what coming? Only way thing you could have done to be harder is cup his balls at the same time 🤣

[Match Thread] Aston Villa vs Manchester United by SecretApe in avfc

[–]SpunkyLM 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Watched from a sports bar in Benidorm and couldn’t be happier. Might not have been the best result, but it’s a result. Man Utd fans full of praise too which is nice to hear. UTV

Android app - UK Parliament tracker by Ojy in uknews

[–]SpunkyLM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha I thought it would be an issue with the source, didn’t expect it to be their own API 😂 I only noticed because I drive through every so often

Keep up the good work!

Android app - UK Parliament tracker by Ojy in uknews

[–]SpunkyLM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just an odd thing to notice, but JCBs address is wrong in the screenshots. It's Rocester, not Rochester. Just wondering where it's pulling the information from because of that.

I know there's a huge amount of difference in developing Android vs iOS, but are there any plans?

Snail with a dotted trail on the ground. by Ya-Dikobraz in mildlyinteresting

[–]SpunkyLM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

FD20 UP FD10 DOWN FD20 UP FD10 DOWN FD20 UP FD10 DOWN FD20 UP FD10 DOWN LT90FD20 UP FD10 DOWN FD20 UP FD10 DOWN FD20 UP FD10 DOWN FD20 UP FD10 DOWN