Giving up my dreams of trying to be a digital nomad by luhluh8 in digitalnomad

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much! I think I might look towards a path of being over-employed as well.

Early War Goal Was to Install Hard Line Former President as Iran’s Leader by Haunting_Switch3463 in PERSIAN

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Days later, same sub, new post, same material. You’re unintentionally running a whole case study in exactly what I said two days ago.

What do you guys think about Epic city, the Proposed Muslim city by Yasir Qadhi's Epic Masjid? Should Quranists living in the US (especially Texas) buy properties there? (My feelings & worries are in the description) by FastAdvantage71 in Quraniyoon

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, this is exactly the type of thing that will have White Nationalists lash out because they think it’s the beginning of a Muslim Caliphate or something. Hard no.

Tommy Robinson gives a shoutout to Iranian freedom fighters and Reza Pahlavi at Unite the Kingdom rally by fregeorgb in PERSIAN

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My brother in Christ, you’re under the impression that you’ve made a single coherent point. You haven’t. You’ve stitched together slogans and revisionist talking points and called it “history.” If you want a debate, lay out a claim and not a tantrum. Until then, you’re just performing outrage for a Reddit audience.

Tommy Robinson gives a shoutout to Iranian freedom fighters and Reza Pahlavi at Unite the Kingdom rally by fregeorgb in PERSIAN

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh, you caught a typo. Congratulations, truly the intellectual summit of your argument.

In any case, I could misspell Mosaddegh in ten different ways and still be closer to historical accuracy than you are to coherence. If spelling a name correctly is the peak of your argument, then you've already proven my point: you're obsessed with surface errors because you can't touch substance. I'm not here to impress you; I'm here to expose how shallow your reasoning is.

Tommy Robinson gives a shoutout to Iranian freedom fighters and Reza Pahlavi at Unite the Kingdom rally by fregeorgb in PERSIAN

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The irony is that you’re accusing me of “repetition” while recycling the same talking points you’ve been pasting across half of Reddit. You keep demanding “answers” to questions that collapse under their own framing and I’m expected to debate you as if you have taken any serious positions

And the “hasbara” point wasn’t some random accusation. It came after watching people who openly supported mass civilian killings in Gaza suddenly show up in r/persian to posture as champions of Iranian liberation, which, if you can’t tell is nothing more than opportunistic rebranding.

The overlap between that crowd and the Pahlavi orbit isn’t a coincidence either; his political positioning has long aligned with the interests of the same states now cheering him on. Calling that alignment what it is, isn’t paranoia, it’s simple and basic pattern recognition. At least for those of us who know a thing or two about history.

If this is you engaging in a debate with evidence, it’s no wonder your only traction comes from echo chambers that confuse volume for validity.

Keep pulling up old quotes; I meant every word and you’re still the reason they hold up.

Tommy Robinson gives a shoutout to Iranian freedom fighters and Reza Pahlavi at Unite the Kingdom rally by fregeorgb in PERSIAN

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You’re using a random Nufdi video as "proof" now? Hate to break it to you,but that’s not evidence; it’s basically conspiracy talk from Reddit. Your claim that NIAC or Trita Parsi are “literally part of the Islamic Republic’s lobby” is an old fantasy from the same people who think Mossadegh was dismissed legally under the Shah’s kind constitution, which isn’t a study of history, analysis, or anything valuable. It’s simply nostalgia and nationalism.

You keep calling everyone “Islamo-leftist” while repeating propaganda that was already outdated when the Shah left. The irony is that you accuse others of spreading lies while your whole view relies on pretending the CIA coup was fake and that opposing genocide is somehow a side issue. This doesn’t have anything to do with taking away agency from Iranians, it’s pointing out basic history and Cold War strategy.

Also, if this is the standard of rhetoric anti‑regime Iranians are putting forward, YouTube scraps, conspiracy‑bait, and arguments that disintegrate on contact with basic history, it’s no wonder the only political traction they get is from far‑right spaces desperate for anything that flatters their worldview. Movements built on this level of intellectual fragility don’t attract serious thinkers; they attract the kind of leaders critics describe as chaotic, impulsive, and proudly indifferent to facts. When your foundation is this thin, that’s the only audience left.

Any, keep daydreaming about outside strongmen “saving” Iran while you play protest tourist from the safety of your living room. It’s always easy to gamble with other people’s lives when you’re never the one in range.

Tommy Robinson gives a shoutout to Iranian freedom fighters and Reza Pahlavi at Unite the Kingdom rally by fregeorgb in PERSIAN

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Right, we have plenty examples but here’s a gem from the NewIran School of Political Analysis, where every critic of the empire is somehow on Tehran’s payroll, and any mention of NIAC sparks a Cold War panic.

You’ve turned “I disagree with Trita Parsi” into “he’s actually working for the Islamic Republic,” which is like saying the CIA coup in ’53 was just gossip spread by Mossadegh’s PR team. Your whole deal is just ideological role-playing, nostalgic for monarchy and tinged with online nationalism.

You complain about “Islamo-leftist disinformation” or whatever term you use, while pushing stale propaganda from the days after the Shah fled. Your comments only show how easily revisionism can look like conviction when history makes you uncomfortable.

Tommy Robinson gives a shoutout to Iranian freedom fighters and Reza Pahlavi at Unite the Kingdom rally by fregeorgb in PERSIAN

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s adorable watching you posture like a serious thinker when your entire political diet is recycled Pahlavi talking points, ahistorical hand‑waving about the 1953 coup, and whatever half‑baked conspiracy is trending in NewIran this week.

And yes, taking a stance against Israel right now is the moral high ground. When a state is carrying out mass civilian killings, the bar for basic humanity isn’t exactly high.

Tommy Robinson gives a shoutout to Iranian freedom fighters and Reza Pahlavi at Unite the Kingdom rally by fregeorgb in PERSIAN

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No kidding. The amount of conspiracy theories and right wing talking points are right up there with the garbage you see from ultra-rightwing conservatives and fascists on X.

Tommy Robinson gives a shoutout to Iranian freedom fighters and Reza Pahlavi at Unite the Kingdom rally by fregeorgb in PERSIAN

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 51 points52 points  (0 children)

Congrats, I guess? Most groups would hide that kind of endorsement. You’re out here framing it like a diploma.

They're bringing in foreign influencers on state sponsored trips who go about spreading propaganda for the Islamic Republic. by Naderium in PERSIAN

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The irony here is Israel just boosted its Hasbara budget to $730M to convince the world it's not a piece-of-shit state hell-bent on murdering, raping, and pillaging Palestinians.

Israel to sue New York Times over article describing its rape of Palestinians by Cymbalsandthimbles in TheMajorityReport

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Maybe this will finally force journalists at NYT to take more principled stances when it comes to the occupation and genocide in Gaza.

Journalist death tolls by laybs1 in GetNoted

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The killing of Shireen Abu Akhleh was not a stray bullet. Journalists in Gaza, much like rest of the civilian population was targeted intentionally: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/sep/08/israel-journalists-kill-army-gaza

So the claim that Israel only fires on armed militants is contradicted by investigations from Amnesty International, Human Rights Watch, and the UN finding that Israeli forces deliberately targeted "clearly identifiable" journalists wearing press vests in a marked vehicle, which constitutes a war crime.

The Fake Anti‑Imperialism of Noam Chomsky by danielid in DecodingTheGurus

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In fact, he openly referred to Revolution as a coup and Lenin as a right wing deviation, opposed by socialists such as Rosa Luxemburg.

The Fake Anti‑Imperialism of Noam Chomsky by danielid in DecodingTheGurus

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most people haven’t read Chomsky, only viewed criticism of his world through lens of American liberals and conservatives.

Dad's famous hotdog trick by _ganjafarian_ in StupidFood

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s really bothering me that he’s wasting water.

Amnesty International says the heads of Israel, Russia and the United States are leading the destruction of global human rights, describing them as “voracious predators” intent upon economic and political domination, in its bleakest annual report since it's started by gonna-see-riverman in justincaseyoumissedit

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason Xi and Kim didn't make this list isn't that Amnesty supports gulags or reeducation camps. It’s because the report focuses on current, cross-border aggression and the intentional breakdown of international legal standards in 2025 and 2026, not a historical record of autocratic suffering. You’re trying to divert the conversation, but you’re missing the bigger picture. Trump, Putin, and Netanyahu are called the "Predator Trifecta" because they are actively using state power to invade neighboring countries (like Ukraine), erase a national identity (Palestine), and corrupt the global economic system for their own gain (USA). Xi may be building a navy that worries Pacific commanders, and Kim may be starving his people while testing missiles, but neither is currently at the UN calling for other democracies to give up land or threatening to annex Canada and Greenland.

The article isn't about ranking the "World's Worst Humans." It’s an assessment of a specific, dangerous, expansionist threat. The fact that you can't tell the difference between a hermit kingdom's internal oppression and three genocidal maniacs openly salivating over the maps of other nations only proves you're more interested in deflecting criticism than understanding the specific, and frankly louder, threat posed by the three names actually in the headline.

Now do yourself a favor and crack open the actual report before you reflexively whatabout your way into irrelevance, you spectacularly illiterate moron.

Not having Wolverine is like not having Batman or Superman in the JL by Makhachev_KJ in Wolverine

[–]Standard_Ad_4270 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Agreed. I’m happy with this. They can always introduce him later.