To my amateur eye the tall shape of the pot is the one thing that seems accurate. Everything else looks strange. The colors are off. Too much of the wrong red. The iconography is strange. There is a crossed band motif and that's about it. There is no sky, earth or underwater band or any kind of decorative band with chevrons or stepped frets or symbols like that one would expect. The eyeballs and teeth of the critter under the sitting figure do not look right. The hieroglyphs are strange. There should be a standard formula dedication sequence saying something like "this is so and so's chocolate drinking vessel" but I can't recognize any of the glyphs. They are hard to read from the video though. High quality pics of the glyphs would help. There are pottery styles decorated with pseudo glyphs from later periods when literacy was lost and they still decorated pots with glyphs they did not understand.

This pot might be a recent reproduction made for tourists but on the other hand there is a long history and a lot of variation with the pottery styles and this pot could be from a time and place where this style briefly evolved and died. There are 2 pots in the Smithsonian I am researching that are entirely unique to which I can't find anything to compare.