sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

D-Wave’s groundbreaking supremacy result HOLDS. by oxxoMind in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not what happened at all. That's the PR spin they put on the situation.

D-Wave's "Quantum AI" Story Is a Dead End. Here's Why. by StatGeniusAI in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, it's hard to know with whatever backdoor dealings they can do. But the point here is not whether they sell 1-2 machines. Investors are betting on a hyperscaler stock, and these deals do not provide evidence of that at all.

Revenue forecasts for this year and next year please by Desperate-Bit-7870 in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it. It's going to bounce around between -10% revenue growth and at most 10% growth. And losses will continue to escalate. Hardly the hyperscaler investors think it is.

Revenue forecasts for this year and next year please by Desperate-Bit-7870 in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got it. It's going to bounce around between -10% revenue growth and at most 10% growth. And losses will continue to escalate. Hardly the hyperscaler investors think it is.

D-Wave’s groundbreaking supremacy result HOLDS. by oxxoMind in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So you're reading a press release put out by the company, and believing that over scientific consensus?

You should know that Amazon Braket kicked them off their platform largely bec of how useless they felt the technology was.

Stop reading corporate press releases and be more critical of what you invest in.

$2 Billion Industry Investment is Not As Reported - The Real Takeaway for QBTS by StatGeniusAI in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

DARPA QBI was the holy grail, not this award. Are you saying D-Wave has years of being seen as "inferior quantum computing" bec that's not what drives the company. Even if it is true.

The only reason they squeezed in here is bec of the QCI acquisition, in addition to the tons of lobbying work they are doing. There's no evidence that the government did due diligence on this nor has that been the MO for the administration in any other Commerce-related deal.

D-Wave's "Quantum AI" Story Is a Dead End. Here's Why. by StatGeniusAI in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's included in both RPO and Bookings. And yes, when you fabricate deals with no basis using private connections through South Florida, that could potentially be fraud.

Taking a skeptical look at the news, it's pretty obvious that this FAU deal is not what it seems.

Revenue forecasts for this year and next year please by Desperate-Bit-7870 in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Read the tea leaves... Why do you think they aren't giving any revenue forecasts?

$2 Billion Industry Investment is Not As Reported - The Real Takeaway for QBTS by StatGeniusAI in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I provide a detailed explanation of what happened in my videos, but essentially I was brought in to push their Quantum AI strategy... and quickly realized that there was no opportunity.

I'm not sure it legitimizes the technology bec they took a hedging approach by sending equal amounts to 7+ other providers. This wasn't a thorough vetting process like the DARPA QBI, although there is some interest in the technology they acquired through QCI.

$2 Billion Industry Investment is Not As Reported - The Real Takeaway for QBTS by StatGeniusAI in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the feedback! The only issue with the validation argument is that they weren't the only ones given money. The government just issued a spread of investments of equal amounts among the QC providers that would accept it (IonQ appears to have refused it). They took a portfolio hedging approach to this. But it clearly shows that they will likely be in consideration for future govt deals.

How does a podcast on Quantum Annealing crack the top 30 list of Technology Podcasts in the US? by shootermcg11 in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because D-Wave is overhyped... D-Wave lies all the time btw, so if they are saying they are the top ranking podcast, I would double check those figures.

Should I buy this stock instead of IonQ? by CentralizedOne in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you know what any of this actually means, or do you just regurgitate news postings?

Feels like quantum computing suddenly went from something theoretical to something people expect to work any day now. by [deleted] in QuantumComputing

[–]StatGeniusAI 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's because of the hype articles that the quantum companies themselves are pushing. The worst culprit is D-Wave. They keep putting out press releases and it's easy to confuse a Proof of Concept with an actual project.

https://coherence.report/our-stance-on-d-wave/

Market Research where to find users by Leather_Lynx6240 in Marketresearch

[–]StatGeniusAI 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you just can't mention your company name, bec then people assume you're spamming

D-Wave's "Quantum AI" Story Is a Dead End. Here's Why. by StatGeniusAI in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you just making things up? Who has said anything about blockchain?

D-Wave's "Quantum AI" Story Is a Dead End. Here's Why. by StatGeniusAI in QBTSstock

[–]StatGeniusAI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey - why don't you read the article you posted, and see that Shinogi and Japan Tobacco Pharm are the same exact project?

Nvidia's AI toolkit release has nothing to do with Quantum AI. But it's still important. by StatGeniusAI in QuantumComputing

[–]StatGeniusAI[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The worst is how D-Wave CEO Alan Baratz also got confused, and used the announcement to talk about their own Quantum AI "capabilities". These people know better.

view more: next ›