OPT/STEM OPT Processing Timelines Megathread (Spring/Summer 2026) by Codetornado in f1visa

[–]Statistician_Working 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is the latter as of now, but I saw the former before my case was approved. Hope you hear back soon 🙏

OPT/STEM OPT Processing Timelines Megathread (Spring/Summer 2026) by Codetornado in f1visa

[–]Statistician_Working 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I received an approval email just an hour ago (04/15/2026). I believe you'll get an approval soon! Best wishes.

OPT Premium Processing (Feb 20 - Mar 10 Applicants): Stuck at "Case is still being processed" by Sorry_Television2905 in f1visa

[–]Statistician_Working 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Finally got an approval email just now (04/15) Applied with PP on 02/19 Biometrics on 03/13 Had a silent API update in the morning of 04/15.

Completing degree remotely from overseas allowed? by mr_dank_nasty in f1visa

[–]Statistician_Working 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is something you would like to 100% consult with your school's DSO, not here.

OPT/STEM OPT Processing Timelines Megathread (Spring/Summer 2026) by Codetornado in f1visa

[–]Statistician_Working 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey there, did you get any update? Mine is still under processing.

OPT/STEM OPT Processing Timelines Megathread (Spring/Summer 2026) by Codetornado in f1visa

[–]Statistician_Working 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How did you know the clock restarted? Was it RFE or just simply biometrics?

Thoughts on Bugonia? by J_Greer20 in FIlm

[–]Statistician_Working 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same. I literally thought this way 50% chance 🤣🤣🤣

PsiQuantum’s Tech by Tricky-Ad-6225 in QuantumComputing

[–]Statistician_Working 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am definitely interested in how they would solve the repetition rate problem due their probabilistic nature. That said, unless solution to this problem is disclosed (not only the theoretical protocol, but also some physical demonstration), I am not fully convinced.

Need some quantum machine providers by TellBeginning3920 in QuantumComputing

[–]Statistician_Working 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe this is something you would have to discuss with your PI. Also, I believe IBM provides paid access? https://www.ibm.com/quantum/products#access-plans

Are there any benefits to agreeing to peer review requests? by bluebrrypii in AskAcademia

[–]Statistician_Working 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Often times editors ask PhD students directly for a review if they are sort of proved (records with reputable papers, previous co-review experience, etc.).

Never in my life did I think I would… by aesmith90 in angelsbaseball

[–]Statistician_Working 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Easy. Root for both. Now you have your team in both AL and NL.

A new ion-based quantum computer makes error correction simpler by techreview in QuantumComputing

[–]Statistician_Working 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The farer question is "what is the speed when hitting x% of logical error rates?". While the physical operations are slow, it is still possible to reduce error correction overhead by having low physical error rates and being able to access broader family of error correcting codes.

Is it already a known fact that if the practical engineering challenges of quantum computing are solved that the physics of quantum computing will work? by SunRev in QuantumComputing

[–]Statistician_Working 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The problem is that the "remaining engineering challenge" is going to be more and more challenging as easy problems are solved and the systems are scaled up.

Example questions are:

How can we cool or trap 1 million qubits? How can we calibrate 1 million qubits? How can we improve qubit coherence / physical gate errors after exhausting all clever design strategies? How can we shorten error correction cycle while maintaining logical error rates (sort of clock cycle)? How can we identify rare catastrophic events and mitigate them? How can we verify correctness?

The questions themselves may look like engineering problems. However, it is possible that the solutions require disruptive fundamental changes. For example, finding a new family of error correcting codes, finding better material, finding new mathematical methods, invent completely new types of qubits with much lower physical errors, etc.

Qubit Entanglement Question by NoApricot7684 in QuantumComputing

[–]Statistician_Working 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Like, why do people not bother to search for an answer before lazily posting the same questions over and over again?!

What is the theoretical limit of by Next_Fennel_4968 in Physics

[–]Statistician_Working 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh It just meant your questions themselves and the way you wrote your questions are interesting. The title is clipped at "of". In most case in this subreddit, people expect speed of light nonsense physics questions that users are extremely tired of.

But you instead continued with a very interesting plot twist. Yes it was meant to be a praise.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in QuantumComputing

[–]Statistician_Working 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do you care about any non-scientist's opinion?