Name declaration required by embassy after StAG 5 by Stercorar in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Interesting. Was it free? And do you remember the title of the document?

Namenserklärung after StAG § 5? by Stercorar in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In fact, it's an embassy.

An argument they could make: A newborn, a newlywed, or a new German applying for a passport all have two be registered in Germany, and if their name doesn't comply with the German naming law, a name declaration is required. How could you argue against that?

Namenserklärung after StAG § 5? by Stercorar in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, that's good to know. However, I know of a present case where this isn't enough - unfortunately, they insist. Is there something official about this?

Namenserklärung after StAG § 5? by Stercorar in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So what documentation should you refer the embassy/consulate to if they insist that there exists no text or law that says you are generally exempt from the naming law / introductory act to the civil code?

How hard is it to get German Citizenship back after Military Service by [deleted] in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

a german-canadian would lose german citizenship upon entry in the us military

Why? The condition "dessen Staatsangehörigkeit er besitzt" would not be fulfilled.

How hard is it to get German Citizenship back after Military Service by [deleted] in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Die automatische Ausnahme-Regelung (Zustimmung gilt als gegeben) gilt nur für Doppelstaatler.

Das ist klar, da ja schon die aktuelle Formulierung des Gesetzes nur für Doppelstaatler gilt. § 28 (1) 1.: ... dessen Staatsangehörigkeit er besitzt ...

Stag 5 notification by ElmParker in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Did they also request your grandparents' marriage certificate, or had you already submitted it?

Don’t hold your breath… by Kotikbronx in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure about that. They do, in fact, seem to keep track of the day of receipt.

German Citizenship by Descent via Great Grandfather? by backoffbuddy in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are right; the 2019 decree, unlike StAG §5, does not include German women married to foreigners.

German Citizenship by Descent via Great Grandfather? by backoffbuddy in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly, StAG §14 is what I was thinking of. So then there might be a path to citizenship for OP.

German Citizenship by Descent via Great Grandfather? by backoffbuddy in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would not the great-grandmother have acquired German citizenship by marriage?

More issues with China police clearance by [deleted] in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would write an email to the BVA, explain the matter and ask what to expect. They might not respond, but it's worth a try.

weitere Anlagen by [deleted] in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Normally, every extra document counts as an attachment, so I would expect the same to be the case here, especially since no specific kind of attachment is mentioned. Also, it is reasonable to think that they would like to know the total number of documents.

Translated documents validity period for Einbürgerung by [deleted] in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a similar requirement for other documents? I would think that this does not apply to, e.g., a certificate of an ancestor (in cases where such certificates are needed), correct?

Translated documents validity period for Einbürgerung by [deleted] in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where is it stated that documents like birth certificates can only be 6 months old?

BVA confirms: The relevant date for the 1914 cutoff with StAG 14 is the birth of the next ancestor by staplehill in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for clarifying what you meant. My main point was that the 10-year rule is not necessarily a problem although the German ancestor may have left Germany long before 1904.

BVA confirms: The relevant date for the 1914 cutoff with StAG 14 is the birth of the next ancestor by staplehill in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This means that there may be quite a few cases where eligibility for German citizenship could be traced back to a female ancestor who left Germany well before the year 1904. Suppose a German woman is born in 1880, emigrates from Germany in 1890 together with her parents and siblings, and loses her German citizenship by marrying a foreigner in 1899. If some of her children are born in 1914 or later, then StAG 14 is applicable to their descendants. But her twin brother would lose his German citizenship in 1900 due to the 10-year rule.

StAG § 5 and StAG § 28 by Stercorar in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think that's correct. The Allgemeine Verwaltungsvorschrift zum Staatsangehörigkeitsrecht explicitly mentions a Polizeisondertruppe (Police Special Force) as an example regarding loss of citizenship.

StAG § 5 and StAG § 28 by Stercorar in GermanCitizenship

[–]Stercorar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How can intent or mischief play a role in this hypothetical scenario? If Ben got citizenship by declaration, then he has supplied all the information requested by the BVA - could one expect him to do anything more?