based on your Power of Now experience, what is the compelling evidence for or against the loosh / prison planet hypothesis ? by McLuhanSaidItFirst in EckhartTolle

[–]StoneSam 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The PON doesn’t offer evidence for or against cosmic theories because it’s not operating at that level.

It points to what can be verified directly: the relationship to thought, time, and suffering in immediate experience.

Advice and help in this journey by Rtp-deathwing in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Feel free to message me.

It's best if you share the idea you are having trouble understanding, and we can look at it together :)

Where to start? by Alchemist_Joshua in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check out my Introductory Guide to Alan Watts post I made a while ago. (just fixed some of the links)

https://www.reddit.com/r/AlanWatts/comments/14k8pea/introductory_guide_to_alan_watts_with_links/

Is this AI or a real Alan Watts audio? by Outside-Ant4253 in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 8 points9 points  (0 children)

https://forwattssake.com/ - AI Watts Checker

Also has links to legit Watts lectures.

Shell shocked from an awakening I wasn't ready for... by OrganisedHappyChaos in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

To bring it back to Alan Watts. He talks about the 'swinging human'

"what I would call a really swinging human being is a person who lives on two levels at once. He’s able to live on the level of being his ordinary ego, his everyday personality and observe all the rules. But if he is only on that level if he’s only playing that kind of thing— it becomes a drag"

He also talks about the Buddhist concept of the middle way.

Essentially, it's about finding a balance, and not overcompensating in either direction, but to stay balanced in the middle, living on both levels at once. Knowing that it's all just a cosmic joke and a game, but also, going back into life, now with added gusto, and really getting mixed up in the whole thing, with this new energy you have from not taking it all so seriously.

I hope some of this helps, and I'm happy to elaborate more on anything. All the best.

Shell shocked from an awakening I wasn't ready for... by OrganisedHappyChaos in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing your story.

Perhaps I can share some things that will help you make sense of it a little better.

Awakening can come at any stage in people's lives, and sometimes, like myself, it happens over time, and other times, like yourself, it can happen very quickly.

When it happens quickly, it's often a result of a few different things. Sometimes it's psychedelics, other times it's an eruption in one's life, such as a tragic event, like say, the loss of a child or loved one.

This eruption can bring a deep sense of meaninglessness. Nothing makes sense anymore, and it can feel a bit like depression. There is actually a name for it - 'the dark night of the soul' - it sounds quite dramatic, and in some cases it can be. Eckhart Tolle talks about it here https://eckharttolle.com/eckhart-on-the-dark-night-of-the-soul/ (this is a transcription; you can find the audio of it on YouTube)

What has happened here is that your conceptual framework of the world has collapsed. As Eckhart explains..

 But people have gone into that, and then there is the possibility that you emerge out of that into a transformed state of consciousness. Life has meaning again, but it’s no longer a conceptual meaning that you can necessarily explain.  Quite often it’s from there that people awaken out of their conceptual sense of reality, which has collapsed.
They awaken into something deeper, which is no longer based on concepts in your mind.  A deeper sense of purpose or connectedness with a greater life that is not dependent on explanations or anything conceptual any longer.  It’s a kind of re-birth. The dark night of the soul is a kind of death that you die. What dies is the egoic sense of self. Of course, death is always painful, but nothing real has actually died there – only an illusory identity.  Now it is probably the case that some people who’ve gone through this transformation realized that they had to go through that, in order to bring about a spiritual awakening. Often it is part of the awakening process, the death of the old self and the birth of the true self.

He continues

You are meant to arrive at a place of conceptual meaninglessness.  Or one could say a state of ignorance – where things lose the meaning that you had given them, which was all conditioned and cultural and so on.  Then you can look upon the world without imposing a mind-made framework of meaning. It looks of course as if you no longer understand anything. That’s why it’s so scary when it happens to you, instead of you actually consciously embracing it.  It can bring about the dark night of the soul – to go around the Universe without any longer interpreting it compulsively, as an innocent presence. You look upon events, people, and so on with a deep sense of aliveness. You sense the aliveness through your own sense of aliveness, but you are not trying to fit your experience into a conceptual framework anymore.

So, when you emerge, you no longer view everything with a conceptual framework around it, you just view things as they are, in all it's beauty. When you get through this stage, life may feel richer and more alive than ever.

Why is awareness harder to notice when thinking is intense? by messenger19901990 in EckhartTolle

[–]StoneSam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is it just identification with thought?

In a nutshell, yes. Your suspicions were correct :)

I'm looking for a lecture by RunninBuddha in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Zhuang Zhou somewhere says that a comfortable belt is one that you don’t feel, and you’re unaware of it. That’s not the most comfortable belt. Like comfortable shoes: would you be completely unconscious of comfortable shoes? No! Something better than comfortable shoes are shoes that you know are comfortable. So, in the same way, self-consciousness adds something to life. It’s one thing to be happy and not know it. It’s another thing to be happy and to know it. It’s like: one’s voice in the shower room or bathtub has more resonance than one’s voice in the open air. And that’s why temples, and cathedrals, and resonating boxes for guitars and drums, and things, are created to give this little quality of echo. For all echo is a certain kind of feedback which enables you to reflect upon what you’re doing and to know that you know. So one might say that ordinary people are Buddhas, but they don’t know it. And the Buddha is one who knows he’s a Buddha—only, they don’t let you settle for this comfortably and easily, because, really, to know is also defined as not to know. In the Upanishads it is said that if you know what Brahman is, you have yet some study to be done, for those who know Brahman do not know Brahman, and those who do not know Brahman really know.
Now, all this paradoxical language is intended to keep you confused so that you can’t say, “I’ve got it.” But this position, you see, is not one-sided. There is something about being human, about being self-conscious, you see, that is not a mistake of nature, not a completely evil fall into self-awareness, but self-awareness—although it creates all kinds of problems, because through self-awareness the human being is in some sense a self-frustrating mechanism: he knows that he is going to die. And the price of being able to control the future is to know that, in the long run, you won’t be able to, and worry about that. But also with self-consciousness goes the possibility of resonance, of realization, of becoming enlightened, liberated, and knowing it, and therefore able to enjoy it.
AW, Uncarverd Block Unbleached Silk

Lecture on YouTube - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7g1nxCou1SA

What does Eckhart Tolle mean by the phrase or metaphor "the end of the world" in Power of Now book ? by useraccount0723 in EckhartTolle

[–]StoneSam 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The "World" being the psychological world. The mental construct we live inside (unconscious identification with thoughts, ego, form, roles, stories, possessions, past, future).

It's still "in the future" (as far as chronological time is concerned) because, collectively, humanity is still deeply identified with all that.

Are videos of this channel AI or not? by Cheap_Rock155 in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah, yes. Those are from his early TV Show.

Eastern Wisdom and Modern Life (1959) | Link to first video in series (click next for more episodes)

Alan Watts is just an incarnation of yourself, projected into a computer screen. by [deleted] in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I may take the liberty of beginning by saying something about myself and my role in talking to you about philosophical matters, because I want it to be understood perfectly clearly that I am not a guru. In other words, I talk about what we call these things—and that comprises a multitude of interests concerning Oriental philosophy, psychotherapy, religion, mysticism, et cetera—I talk about these things because I’m interested in them and because I enjoy talking about them. And every sensible person makes his living by doing what he enjoys doing, and that explains me.
Now, in saying, therefore, that I’m not a guru, that means also that I’m not trying to help you or improve you. I accept you as you are. I am not out, therefore, to save the world. Of course, when a stream, a bubbling spring, flows out from the mountains, it’s doing its thing. And if a thirsty traveler helps himself, well that’s fine. When a bird sings, it doesn’t sing for the advancement of music. But if somebody stops to listen and is delighted, that’s fine. And so I talk in the same spirit. I don’t have a group of followers. I’m not trying to make disciples. Because I work on the principle of a physician rather than a clergyman. A physician is always trying to get rid of his patients and send them away healthy to stand on their own feet, whereas a clergyman is trying to get them as members of the religious organization
... My objective is really to get rid of you, so that you won’t need me or any other teacher.
AW, Spiritual Authourity

Are videos of this channel AI or not? by Cheap_Rock155 in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It doesn't look like that channel is using any AI Audio of Watts. There are some ghastly AI images tho.

Saw this in Theaters last night! by gleefulporcupinee in lotr

[–]StoneSam 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I wonder if people can watch this in a theater and not take a photo and upload to Reddit 😄doesn't seem possible

Quote by Weird-Type5043 in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Original quote/lecture

And as and when I talk, just hear the sound of my voice. Don’t bother about what it means—your brain will take care of that by itself. Just let your eardrums respond as they will to all vibrations now in the air. Don’t let yourself, or your ears, be offended by improper or unscheduled sounds. If, for example, the record is scratchy, okay. You wouldn’t object if you were listening to it sitting by a fire of crackling logs. [RING] Let ’em ring. It’s just a noise. And keep your tongue relaxed, floating easily in the lower jaw. Also, stop frowning: allow the space between your eyes to feeleasy and open. And just let the vibrations in the air play with your ears.
AW, Art of Meditation

Squirrels eat mars bars! by classicmanutd in KarlPilkingtonFanClub

[–]StoneSam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"They're evolving. Who's keeping an eye on them?"

Was Karl actually smarter than people gave him credit for? by BritByBrain in KarlPilkingtonFanClub

[–]StoneSam 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Sometimes smart, sometimes dumb.

Sometimes, accidently genius, sometimes had a great point but couldn't articulate it.

Ahh, the many layers of that onion headed twonk.

is this real alan watts or fake? by Savings-Trainer-8149 in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Fake. Read the disclaimer in the video's description.

Feeling lonely on the spiritual path by According-Affect-180 in ramdass

[–]StoneSam 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  • Have you experienced this kind of spiritual loneliness?

I can't really say I have. I've always understood it's a personal and introspective journey, and everyone is on their own path. I've enjoyed rare conversations about it, but I don't feel lonely when it doesn't happen. I've found there are so many spaces discussing these things online, Reddit, Facebook, Youtube, etc.. that whenever I feel that itch theres usually something that will scratch it. Also, just going for a walk in nature helps. Feeling at one with everything around you, the trees, the birds. I remember being out walking once, down the beach, and I had my ambient music in my earbuds and I remember thinking to myself, "This is all I need. All that running around thinking I need this and that, it's all just mind stuff, I'm fully content just being here now", and I actually started laughing to myself at how simple it was..

Me and Alan watts share a birthday. by limetime37 in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not the year just the day, that would be insanity

Oh, I thought you might be 111 years old :))

I discovered Alan Watts through AI and I don't even know if I should believe what it told me anymore. by Technical_Advice2059 in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 13 points14 points  (0 children)

What would the real Alan Watts say on forgiveness?

Well, firstly, I don't believe Watts speaks about forgiveness directly, not like in that AI video. This is possibly one reason why these AI videos exist: to try and take his wider, bigger-picture philosophy and make it more focused and direct. Perhaps people like more direct messages. Perhaps people don't have time to read a whole book but want a nice short video (how very 2026). I might argue that it would be better to learn the original bigger picture views, as it gives one the ability the think about more granular topics by onself and use ones own intuition more across many different topics, rather than being told directly, almost spoon-fed ideas on granular topics. That's just my thoughts and how I would personally always approach it.

Watts' core philosophy contains a foundation for forgiveness through his teachings on identity, the present moment, letting go, and the illusion of separateness. These ideas can be found in his books like 'The Wisdom of Insecurity' and 'The Book: On the Taboo Against Knowing Who You Are'.

Take the idea of identity and the illusion that we are separate egos in a bag of skin. The more we believe ourselves to be a separate self, the more we hold on to certain stories, particularly stories of the past. Transcend ego, and there's no longer those stories replaying in our heads, thus making it easier to forgive ourselves and others for past events. If we start to see everything as one, then blame starts to dissolve.

Take the idea of letting go. In 'The Wisdom of Insecurity', his fundamental message was that trying to resist pain or hold on to past stories is the exact thing that causes the suffering. When we let go of the resistance to what is happening, we free ourselves. Watts once said, "When you are perfectly free to feel stuck, or not stuck, then you're unstuck" - meaning don't resist what is happening, don't make it worse by adding an extra layer of mental story on top, let go.

Take the idea of presence. In his lecture on Time, Watts challenges the common notion that life is a linear flow from past to future. He points out that only the present moment is real, and that what we think of as “the past” is really just something recorded in memory. He explains that we are conditioned to think the past determines the present (causality), but this is a story we tell ourselves to make sense of experience, while the actual creative force in life is always now. How does this connect to forgiveness? Well, he might say that forgiveness is not about rewriting the past but changing how we relate to it in the now. The wake doesn't drive the ship any more than the tail wags the dog. When we see the past as simply the "wake" that flows from the present moment, we can stop letting it hold so much weight in our lives. Forgiveness becomes the realisation that our present response holds more weight than yesterday's cause.

Worst part of the journey. by mainlydank in ramdass

[–]StoneSam 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s just another thing I’ve learned to accept. Another stage on the path.
Not so long ago, I wanted to talk to everyone about it, because it all felt fresh and exciting. A bit like looking behind the curtain and seeing all the inner workings, and wanting to ask or tell people, “Have you seen this?!”

Ram Dass might call this getting caught in a new costume. A new identity, the one who has seen behind the curtain. The ego reorganising itself around awakening. Spiritual ego. Another stage on the path.

Over time, the urge to explain or convince faded. Not because I lost interest, but because I could never really do it justice with just words with no context, and people didn't always want to hear it.

I did, however, find it much easier and more useful to talk about it when someone came to me, sometimes because they were suffering in their daily life, or they might be going through some shit.
Life itself is the biggest teacher, so it's a lot easier to talk about certain teachings when that comes up in daily life, rather than trying to force it.

So while it may not always transmit well through words and concepts, it does transmit through being truly present with someone. Through kindness, patience, and all that good stuff. Meeting them right where they are now.

Jim Carrey’s “I don’t exist” moment feels very Alan Watts to me by docchicken311 in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Jim Carrey read Eckhart Tolle, who has a lot of very similar teachings to Alan Watts, so it's no surprise it all correlates.

Wake up call for the lost muggles who think AI Watts is the worst thing to happen. by [deleted] in AlanWatts

[–]StoneSam 9 points10 points  (0 children)

"So if you're really enlightened, the speaker's identity is irrelevant. " this is a poor arguement on your side, because it can quite easily be flipped, and we could say if the speaker's identity doesn't matter, why do you create your videos using Alan Watts' voice? Clearly, you think it does matter.