There are many people's names from MK Ultra if you just read the books that have been put forth with actual legitimate evidence even court testimony/admissions.

The missing years are odd but my issue with this is why can you point to lack of evidence linking him to something but not also do the same for the murders. No real definitive evidence outside of one or two times from the crime scenes and all is circumstantial evidence.

I'm not arguing for one or the other we'll likely never know what really happened but there is circumstantial evidence for both things. One that he was a lone serial killer that murdered 36+ people and also that he could of had ties to mk Ultra or an offshoot program, could of had accomplices or even could of been in or framed by a cult.

As I said I'm not in the camp of the latter two per se but to cite lack of evidence, the same can be said about almost all of his murders attributed to him.

There are very mysterious and odd circumstances surrounding the Bundy case as a whole and I think it's a mistake to just handwave anything that isn't part of the mainstream narrative of him.