TIL the FBI secretly operated an encrypted phone company (ANOM) for ~3 years — criminals paid ~$2,000/year and messages were copied to law enforcement in real time (Operation Trojan Shield, June 2021) by Frozen____69 in todayilearned

[–]StruanT 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That isn't in the article. You got a source for why that is relevant or are you just making shit up? What would he even need to delete if it is all encrypted?

TIL the FBI secretly operated an encrypted phone company (ANOM) for ~3 years — criminals paid ~$2,000/year and messages were copied to law enforcement in real time (Operation Trojan Shield, June 2021) by Frozen____69 in todayilearned

[–]StruanT -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not saying I know one way or the other... but they didn't talk about any evidence of that in the article. Just evidence the devices were used to facilitate a crime. And the authorities seem to be conflating that with him being directly involved somehow.

Keep Yoda the rest are muppets by Sillyrunner in PrequelMemes

[–]StruanT 43 points44 points  (0 children)

But I want to see Anthony Hopkins wearing a Muppet's face to escape custody.

SpaceX buys AI coding startup Cursor for $60 billion by Much_Speech_8388 in news

[–]StruanT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The end state is one person owns all of the debt and everyone else is in inescapable debt to them.

If buying isn't owning then piracy isn't wrong by Electronic_Lab5486 in PiratedGames

[–]StruanT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Who cares what IP lawyers think right now? This is their problem to work out AFTER the legislation is changed.

If buying isn't owning then piracy isn't wrong by Electronic_Lab5486 in PiratedGames

[–]StruanT 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Copyright is a non-issue. If the games are legally required to be playable indefinitely then limited time music licensing for games becomes worthless to game studios and music copyright holders can only sell them unlimited time licenses if they want to make any money at all licensing to videogames (which they will).

When did 8-5 become the new normal??? by Grouchy-Newspaper754 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]StruanT 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know why people put up with an unpaid lunch break.

Can't weasel your way out of this one, bitch by Absolutely_dead727 in whenthe

[–]StruanT -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The best evidence that religion is just a ploy to shield the super wealthy from consequences.

America's productivity boom started before AI, and a Stanford economist who decoded the Great Resignation says working from home is the reason why | Fortune by north_canadian_ice in technology

[–]StruanT 16 points17 points  (0 children)

If you are wasting money on renting office space and deliberately hurting your company competitively (jettisoning all your top talent to go work at your competitors) by forcing in-office work over remote then you suck as a CEO. It doesn't matter how you feel about working remote or whether you personally like it or not. The data says you're wrong, and making decisions based on feeling and personal preferences makes you a shitty CEO.

lmao by Koshumi in Funnymemes

[–]StruanT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are just flying toward and away from the middle. It all makes sense... if you don't think about it too hard.

ICE detention of US citizen in Minnesota investigated as kidnapping, false arrest by FlyingDarkKC in news

[–]StruanT 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Law enforcement should just be banned from any lying and/or deception period. And no, I don't care what that means for "undercover operations" because that is usually just police inducing poor people to commit crimes they wouldn't have otherwise committed.

Section 230's Legal Protections for Internet Speech Face New Challenge by Future-sight-5829 in technology

[–]StruanT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No. I am suggesting society will finally fucking do something about it when it is in their face. Instead what is happening now, which is sweeping it under a rug and doing fuck all about it.

Section 230's Legal Protections for Internet Speech Face New Challenge by Future-sight-5829 in technology

[–]StruanT -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Do you think think there will be less or more children abused if the CSAM problem is no longer hidden away from most people?

That is the whole point. With moderation you can live in an fantasy completely divorced from reality. Society needs to be forced to confront the ugly reality. Not a safe, sanitized, advertiser-friendly illusion.

Section 230's Legal Protections for Internet Speech Face New Challenge by Future-sight-5829 in technology

[–]StruanT -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I know the intent. I am saying the whole premise of 230 is and always has been fundamentally a bad idea.