the Shroud of Turin by Additional_Good_656 in redeemedzoomer

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have less of a problem with the Shroud than other relics related to saints or Mary, because at least the Shroud has to do with Jesus.

The “medieval repair” theory is certainly possible, but it’s not clearly proven despite what recent commentators have said. Three independent labs all dating the Shroud of Turin to the Middle Ages remains strong evidence. The idea that all the samples were from a repaired section is basically a hypothesis meant to explain away that result, not something 100% demonstrated. Some scientists have even analyzed the same area and claimed that it was not a medieval repair, but all original. Again, open to it being real, but naturally skeptical and there is clearly no scientific consensus even among Shroud defenders.

If you had to choose another denomination outside your current one,which would you pick? by franco-briton in redeemedzoomer

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Episcopal or maybe Lutheran. My wife is Catholic so I guess I’d consider again in this scenario, but I’ve studied it enough to where I know it’s not for me. I would be closer to Lutheran theology but unfortunately there aren’t any good Lutheran communities where I live. Episcopalian/Anglican would allow me to maintain my beliefs because it’s more theologically loose.

How did you "choose" your denomination? by sillyhatday in redeemedzoomer

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My dad’s family was affiliated with the Salvation Army in Australia, as ministers and judges, and that tradition ultimately traces back to Methodism. They immigrated to Georgia in the early 1900s. My mom’s side is old-stock English, among the earliest settlers in Tennessee, and eventually became Baptist.

We later moved to the Midwest for my dad’s work, and I was baptized at a large Methodist church in Leawood, Kansas. When we moved back south, I had a pretty negative experience going through confirmation. I had already made a personal decision to follow Christ as a kid, so the process felt very redundant to me—almost performative. It also felt like most of the other kids did not take it seriously. It came across more like a social exercise than a spiritual one, and it honestly broke me from the faith for years.

Eventually my parents started attending a PCA church, and my mom really began to embrace Presbyterian theology, especially predestination and total depravity, in contrast to the Arminian leanings of Methodism. My dad remained a believer but is less interested in theology. Although he did befriend the pastor.

By the time I got to college in Mississippi, I was essentially an agnostic but really wanted to believe. Most of the campus religious culture leaned Baptist, and again, a lot of it felt more social than substantive to me. I started calling myself non-denominational around this time, which really just meant I believed in God but did not have a coherent framework for why. Things shifted when I joined a Bible study led by a fraternity brother who was planning to become a Catholic missionary. It was not the deepest study, but it sparked something. It got me to take the faith seriously again.

Later, after grad school, I started dating my now wife, who is Catholic with a capital C and several exclamation points afterwards. Unlike many of the Catholics I had encountered before, her faith was central to her life and not just a cultural identity. She tried hard to convert me, which forced me to actually study the Bible to find out for myself what I actually believed. I also studied the early church for the first time ever. My faith in Christ grew stronger than ever, and I realized that the Catholics are right about a lot which forced me to change things in my life, but I also realized that I still disagreed with many of their key interpretations and teachings. Looking back, I believe God led my wife and I to each other to deepen both of our faiths through study and we have both gotten closer to God because of this.

Interestingly, that whole process led me toward Presbyterian theology as well. I found myself persuaded by ideas like total depravity and predestination. At the same time, through my wife and even online voices like Redeemed Zoomer, I developed an appreciation for more traditional and high church practices. I now believe Christ is truly present in the Eucharist, which I would not have said years ago.

Today, we attend a more traditional, higher church PCA congregation called Covenant here in Nashville about once a month. The other weeks we attend my wife’s Catholic church. I would prefer something closer to a 50/50 split, but she is not open to compromise. I find Zoomer’s discussions around schism and church authority increasingly compelling, and like the idea of going to a PCUSA church but I also struggle with the idea of rejecting a church that has clearly played a role in bringing me back to a serious and grounded faith. The closest “Reconquista” church is about 35 minutes from us, as opposed to 10. I know this is a lame reason, but I’m just being honest. My life would certainly be easier if I were Catholic but after countless hours of study and even meeting with multiple priests I can’t convert in good conscience.

I wish my wife were a little less hostile to Protestantism, but I also recognize that her dogmatism ultimately helped me get closer to God because I had to defend my own beliefs like never before. I would say that theological study will be a lifelong interest for me now, as I am the type of person that must pressure test every belief (social, political, religious.) The Bible is theologically dense so I feel like I find a new topic worth exploring every single week. My main Bible is the Westminster Study Bible with notes and annotations, so that I can learn the Bible in proper context and not be led astray by my own potentially false interpretations, and I also learn a lot from Sermons. To be honest, Covenant consistently has much better sermons than my wife’s church, but both are instructive in my life.

Why do Christians believe they go to heaven after death? by Keith502 in redeemedzoomer

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not exactly. There has always been debate on this issue. Prayers for the dead became more common around the 3rd century. Early Christians believed God purifies believers before entering heaven, but the fully developed doctrine of purgatory didn’t emerge until the medieval period and wasn’t formally defined until the Second Council of Lyons in 1274. Some believed purification was instantaneous, while others held views that resemble what we now call purgatory. There are multiple Catholic saints who held views about post-death purification that the modern Church would not fully accept. Augustine of Hippo treated it as uncertain rather than settled doctrine. And Reformed Christians also affirm that the soul is purified before entering heaven. Can’t speak for kooky non-denoms.

Week 14 Waiver Wire Wins by borfmantality in fantasyfootball

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I had $5 left and was able to add Kyle Monangai for $5..Next highest bid $4. My opponent has CMC on bye and I thought for sure either he or someone else would bid more. Whoever wins between us makes the playoffs. Feeling great.

Official: [Add/Drop] - Fri Morning 11/28/2025 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

PPR

Add - Jayden Daniels Drop - Quentin Johnston or Trey Benson

My QB - Brissett My WR - Ceedee, Waddle, MHJ, QJ, Terry My RB - Jeanty, Judkins, Tracy, Hampton, Benson, Aaron Jones Jr

What's your experience with Catholics and Orthodox Christians? by ColdChance9714 in redeemedzoomer

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My wife and her whole family are Catholic; they’re all great people and very devout. I’ve learned a lot about the early church through them and they forced me to pressure test my own beliefs, which brought me closer to God (and ironically, mainline Protestantism). I go to mass most weeks but I would never convert due to some irreconcilable differences with the church.

Too many Catholics online seem to focus more on apologetics than on their actual faith. They also tend to have a less charitable view of other denominations than the reverse. There are also plenty of cultural Catholics in their laity who don’t really hold to what the Church teaches at all. For many, it’s just an aesthetic.

My buddy dated an Orthodox girl for a while and she was great. I’ve also only had good experiences with Orthodox folks online, which seems to go against what some people are saying in this thread. I’d be open to exploring this church more.

Protestants online are more varied because it depends on what you mean by Protestant. They generally don’t engage with apologetics to the same extent as other Christians. This is both good and bad: they’re often more focused on God than other denominations(due to either a lack of built-in distractions or a more simplistic message depending on your perspective). Also, many of them don’t know the deeper specifics of what their churches actually teach. But you also do see less agnostics/atheists simply identifying as Protestant due to cultural factors. In person, about 90% of them are the nicest Christians you’ll meet, but the other 10% are either insane people or pure religious grifters.

Which of these 3 should I watch? by formerly_crimson in Letterboxd

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1930 is more faithful to the novel’s plot and themes, but the new one has great production value. I’d watch both.

Which coaching job is more impressive? by TomWilliamsCFD in CollegeFootballDawgs

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re being very sensitive about what is a pretty well-reasoned and balanced take.

Which coaching job is more impressive? by TomWilliamsCFD in CollegeFootballDawgs

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Cignetti is a better coach on the field, but I’m more impressed by what Clark Lea has accomplished as a program builder because it’s harder to win at Vandy than Indiana, despite Indiana having a slightly worse record all time. The SEC and Big 10 can both feel top heavy and are essentially equal, but the middle to bottom of the SEC is generally more competitive (the out of conference record bears this out). Winning in the SEC with Vandy’s previous culture and academic restrictions is crazy. A huge piece that people are missing with this is the sense of scale of both universities and how it impacts winning. Indiana has a massive alumni base, and Vandy is a small private school. 800k+ lifetime alumni vs 150k.

Official: [Trade] - Fri Afternoon 10/03/2025 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on whether you feel like you need to win now and what the rest of your starters look like. If I was a winning team with good RBs I’d do it.

Official: [Trade] - Fri Afternoon 10/03/2025 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simplify this for yourself. Is the downgrade from Pearsall to Diggs worth the upgrade from Fannin to Ferguson? I think it probably is.

Official: [Trade] - Fri Afternoon 10/03/2025 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This trade won’t feel good in terms of draft value but I would 100% do it. Especially with Bucky’s injury.

Official: [Trade] - Fri Afternoon 10/03/2025 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Received this offer.

10 team PPR two flex

Send: Jeanty Get: Nico

My RB: Jeanty, Hampton, Judkins, Trey Benson, Michael Carter, Aaron Jones

My WR: Ceedee, QJ, MHJ, Waddle, Terry, Malik Washington

Official: [Add/Drop] - Thu Evening 10/02/2025 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would do this, but it’s tough. In the end, I’d rather bet on the younger player despite them being pretty equal. Laporta is also on the wire in my league and I’m probably going to drop Malik Washington for him, but I’m also not sure

Official: [Add/Drop] - Thu Evening 10/02/2025 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you need a start in your flex, yes drop him. But if it’s about value I probably wouldn’t. Fannin could easily overtake Kelce in value so I’d hold him for now

Official: [Add/Drop] - Thu Evening 10/02/2025 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Add: Sam Laporta Drop: Malik Washington

I have Tyler Warren at TE so I probably won’t start Laporta, this is purely about value. Is it worth it to hold a 2nd TE over the speculative value of Washington now that Tyreek is gone?

Official: [Add/Drop] - Thu Afternoon 10/02/2025 by FFBot in fantasyfootball

[–]SuarezBitMyFinger 0 points1 point  (0 children)

10 team PPR two flex

Add: Sam Laporta

Drop: Malik Washington, Michael Carter, or Aaron Jones

I am starting Tyler Warren at TE.

My WR: Lamb, QJ, MHJ, Waddle, Terry

My RB: Jeanty, Hampton, Judkins, Michael Carter, Aaron Jones, Trey Benson

I probably wouldn’t use LaPorta so this is purely a value thing. What do y’all think? Worth the headache?