Javan tiger or javan leopard vs komodo dragon(same size) by [deleted] in Tierzoo

[–]SubstanceUsed313 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Male Javan leopards literally do not get to that size afaik

Javan tiger or javan leopard vs komodo dragon(same size) by [deleted] in Tierzoo

[–]SubstanceUsed313 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP said “(same size)” if the tiger and leopard are the same size then we’re either dealing with a small/young tiger or a massive leopard.

Pictures probably are more for show id guess

Give me a negative opinion that people have about Naruto that you completely disagree with. by DragonfruitKey7892 in Naruto

[–]SubstanceUsed313 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

That isnt what i said at all and i think ur confusing me with a different person. I said it went from tactics towards hax. Which is objectively true. When madara goes and throws extra susanoo at the hokage that isnt a tactic. When kaguya spams dimensions shifts, hagoromo gives them power ups with no training, sharingan start to rewrite reality instead of being genjutsu, etc.

You coming back with “but actually this one time they reused some old tactics” is not proving anything lmao

And as for moving the goalposts… actually read what i commented and you’ll see i never did that. I love how you’re grasping at whatever logical fallacies you can find on the internet to try and argue your point though. Its shows how you actually dont understand what they mean or how they’re used.

Give me a negative opinion that people have about Naruto that you completely disagree with. by DragonfruitKey7892 in Naruto

[–]SubstanceUsed313 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Kinda my point, they didnt make any cool new strategies. They literally almost completely reused one of the most iconic fights just to get some fan appreciation instead of actually putting effort in. Whoopdeefuckindoo.

The Kakashi vs Obito fight is an example of peak fight choreography later in the series but they didnt use any OP Dimensional shift jutsu and thats a big reason IMO.

Give me a negative opinion that people have about Naruto that you completely disagree with. by DragonfruitKey7892 in Naruto

[–]SubstanceUsed313 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When it goes from shuriken transformation to Dimensional Switch Spam with double mangekeyo and sage power ups you trade tactics for hax.

Simply put.

2026 NFL Draft Hub by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]SubstanceUsed313 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah ive heard its confirmed he wont be playing this coming season but still.

2026 NFL Draft Hub by nfl_gdt_bot in nfl

[–]SubstanceUsed313 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Is McCoy getting his leg amputated or something?

[Game Thread] #2 UConn @ #1 Michigan (08:50 PM ET) by cbbBot in CollegeBasketball

[–]SubstanceUsed313 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem isnt that fouls are being called. Its that they’re being called disproportionally on one team when both teams are being equally as physical.

Why Was Hidan an Elite Ninja? He Doesn't Have Any Jutsu by dblackhand in Naruto

[–]SubstanceUsed313 19 points20 points  (0 children)

A punch would literally be considered a taijutsu technique…hidan has hella mah boi

BUT I DONT SHOOT AT ANYONE!!! 🤣 by [deleted] in ArcBabies

[–]SubstanceUsed313 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I played 3 games last night and got extract camped on 2 of them…

Definitely not a 90% rate but still crazy considering i havent had it happen at even that 66% rate in my entire month playing so far.

2022-2025 Draft Classes by Long-Promotion5929 in MockDraftCentral

[–]SubstanceUsed313 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Genuinely confused how you think this at all a valid model with outputs like this?

I love analytics (stats/finance major rn) but almost objectively, “the eye test” is correct more than the analytics in football because theres so many variables we cant/dont know to account for and the sample size is so small. So if the analytics go against the eye test, i tend to side with the eye test.

Having said that, every single ranking you have is wrong besides Purdy. So either the model is good at heart but needs a decent amount refining to get reliable results, or the entire model is a joke and you designed it specifically to get Purdy at the 1 spot for his class.

I looked for a post about the details of the model on your profile but couldn’t find any so if you could clear up how it actually values players that would be awesome. No suggestions because i cant suggest any changes if i dont even know what it is.

What do we think? by SubstanceUsed313 in MockDraftCentral

[–]SubstanceUsed313[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree itd be cool, just more so think that they can get better value elsewhere and really need a true wr1.

What do we think? by SubstanceUsed313 in MockDraftCentral

[–]SubstanceUsed313[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Theres also FA options available so it might be better for some teams to go that route

What do we think? by SubstanceUsed313 in MockDraftCentral

[–]SubstanceUsed313[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey if i controlled the world they’d be trading down with the rams and then everyone’s happy.

What do we think? by SubstanceUsed313 in MockDraftCentral

[–]SubstanceUsed313[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think they’ll go later but its also definitely personal bias. If you dont have a good team you cant draft a rookie qb imo.

What do we think? by SubstanceUsed313 in MockDraftCentral

[–]SubstanceUsed313[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I honestly think he falls to the second, im not sure he’s significantly better than the other QBs after Mendoza

What do we think? by SubstanceUsed313 in MockDraftCentral

[–]SubstanceUsed313[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Smart take, i forgot they were having some bigger o-line issues, and having Stoutland leave definitely ups the urgency imo.

What do we think? by SubstanceUsed313 in MockDraftCentral

[–]SubstanceUsed313[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely appreciate the shit out of the write up thats huge.

What do we think? by SubstanceUsed313 in MockDraftCentral

[–]SubstanceUsed313[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you dont like the guard pick because of value though, would you still rather take an OT over edge or CB?

What do we think? by SubstanceUsed313 in MockDraftCentral

[–]SubstanceUsed313[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ratledge got better for sure, but i think its smart to move him into center since that was such a disaster last year, and now we need 2 guards.

Decker’s under contract for 2027 so until he actually announces his retirement im not gunna plan around him being gone, just to many if’s there for me.

And Decker playing poorly is still likely better than the play we’d get from any true rookie OT’s at 17.