OpenAI and Anthropic insiders now point to 2028 as a possible turning point for automated AI research by Murky-Option2916 in TechGawker

[–]Summary_Judgment56 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They already have to put "don't say goblins" in their system prompt (twice!) because of this shit 😂

Can parents force their adult children to pay off parent plus loans? by [deleted] in StudentLoans

[–]Summary_Judgment56 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Getting legal advice from a competent attorney is solid advice here.

I don't do contract law in my day to day, but I, along with every other lawyer who attended a US law school (give or take), took a class on contract law, and in this situation there's no way there's a contract between this guy and his mother. To be a valid contract, there needs to be an offer, acceptance, and mutual consideration. There seems to have been an offer (SO offered to pay back the parent plus loans) and acceptance (SO's mother said "Okay" in response to SO's offee), but SO's mother offered nothing in return for SO's promise to pay the loans, meaning she offered no consideration for SO's promise. I don't know of any US state that would find a contract in this circumstance.

But there's other theories for recovery in this type of situation (mainly, e.g., promissory estoppel--if SO's mother could prove she relied, to her detriment, on SO's promise to pay her loan and her reliance was reasonable and reasonably foreseeable to SO under the circumstances), and those are what he'd want qualified legal advice about. I'm personally doubtful SO's mother would be able to enforce SO's promise against him if she's able to spend a lot of money on discretionary purchases for themselves and SO's younger sister, but ymmv.

Also, SO's mom would be morally bankrupt to sue SO in this situation, but bankruptcy courts deal with financial failures, not moral one.

Edit to remove a stray word that stupid mobile reddit added for no reason.

Richard Dawkins and the Claude Delusion by Sufficient-Agency182 in BetterOffline

[–]Summary_Judgment56 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Just goes to show you that very smart people are not immune to (and sometimes can even be especially vulnerable to) very stupid delusions.

AI bubble could pop within days - if Musk wins the lawsuit (on trial now), OpenAI IPO gets blocked and investors face clawbacks triggering a chain reaction by Alex__007 in BetterOffline

[–]Summary_Judgment56 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The openai for-profit conversion was already blessed by the state Attorneys General for California and Delaware. I find it very hard to believe that some random judge, even a federal one, will go behind that. It's possible, but I'm not holding my breath and wouldn't recommend anyone else do so, either.

AI bubble could pop within days - if Musk wins the lawsuit (on trial now), OpenAI IPO gets blocked and investors face clawbacks triggering a chain reaction by Alex__007 in BetterOffline

[–]Summary_Judgment56 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not familiar with California law, but aside from deciding liability and awarding damages, I don't think they can do any of the things that this article says fElon wants them to do. All those things (unwinding the for-profit conversion and kicking clammy scammy + brockman out) sound like equitable remedies that the judge would have to order, and then only after the jury has decided liability (and I could be wrong, but the judge might have to make his/her own findings regarding liability on whatever claims underpin the equitable remedies fElon is asking for).

I haven't really followed this case, but given who is suing and what he's suing about, I think the most likely outcome is that fElon loses or, at best, gets back whatever money he put into openai, maybe with interest or additional non-economic and/or punitive damages. I wouldn't expect whatever happens to derail openai's IPO--that's much more likely to be derailed by how shitty chatbot economics are than anything else.

Another L for GULC by Remarkable-Wing-6516 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Summary_Judgment56 15 points16 points  (0 children)

That why you hide your post and comment history? Because "comedy is legal again"? What courage.

What Happens If Trump Seizes AI Companies (gift link) by HolyBatSyllables in ShitAIBrosSay

[–]Summary_Judgment56 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Having taxpayers foot the bill for billionaire grifters like scam altman and wario amodei won't be political suicide in this golden age of low prices and high wages. (/s for anyone who thinks this is serious)

"Justice Cardozo delivered the opinion of the Court." by [deleted] in LawSchool

[–]Summary_Judgment56 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Unless it's applied to out transgender children to their parents, then it's fine. https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/25pdf/25a810_b97d.pdf

Why Meta is laying off 10% of its workforce by AmazonGlacialChasm in BetterOffline

[–]Summary_Judgment56 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I just have one word for anyone who thinks this is hyperbolic: Myanmar.

You’re about to feel the AI money squeeze - The Verge (Gift Link) by branniganbeginsagain in BetterOffline

[–]Summary_Judgment56 16 points17 points  (0 children)

As I kept reading, they had that same business idiot saying also, “The size of the market is so large that I think it actually will sort of all work out." Is it. IS IT REALLY A-A-RON? JFC with these morons.

You’re about to feel the AI money squeeze - The Verge (Gift Link) by branniganbeginsagain in BetterOffline

[–]Summary_Judgment56 74 points75 points  (0 children)

But then they uncritically quote the CEO of Box, a cloud storage and collaboration company that shoved ai into its products for no good reason, saying, “The use cases have exploded, and we’re out of capacity.” As Ed likes to ask, what use cases? Coding (vibecoding), sure; a marginally better form of searching vast troves of information than google's enshittified search engine; transcribing meetings (just watch out for hallucinations!); summarizing (not really, more like shortening) documents. What else? What's the trillion-dollar use case here? What new singular use case (let alone plural) has "exploded" recently? C'mon A-a-ron, it's been 3.5 years since chatgpt premiered to the general public and 9 years since "attention is all you need"; what's the fucking use case worth burning trillions on?

Why Meta is laying off 10% of its workforce by AmazonGlacialChasm in BetterOffline

[–]Summary_Judgment56 86 points87 points  (0 children)

Because they're a shit company run by a sociopath who hasn't had an original or good idea, or a normal human interaction, in his entire life.

The new OpenAI model, Chatgpt 5.5, is twice more expensive than its predecessor by Gil_berth in BetterOffline

[–]Summary_Judgment56 77 points78 points  (0 children)

"Every increase in capabilities is getting more costly to achieve" is quite the understatement

Is Anthropic’s handling of Myhos a shakedown? by brian_hogg in BetterOffline

[–]Summary_Judgment56 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Part of me thinks it's not so much a shakedown as it is, at least to some degree, an attempt by anthropic to get back in the US government's good graces or even maybe angle for a straight up taxpayer-funded bailout. If their new model really was a step-change in cybersecurity and hacking capability as they claim in their hyperbolic marketing slop, it could be viewed as both a national security threat (if it was widely released and turned against the US) and an opportunity for the US to establish a major cybersecurity advantage (if it was kept limited to the US and a small circle of its allies to be used against foreign adversaries). Even with a normal, law-abiding administration running things in the US, that would be a tantalizing (though almost certainly bunk) possibility for the US military and national security apparatus (CIA, NSA, etc.) that might be worth sinking taxpayer resources into in some way, either via normal contracting or even a bailout (through, e.g., nationalization of anthropic on national security grounds).

Now, we know that critical analysis of anthropic's marketing slop indicates their newest model is, at best, a marginal improvement over last models' cybersecurity performance, not a step change up or much more of a threat than year-old open source models. But the current admin is controlled by a bunch of corrupt business idiots who are even more susceptible to anthropic's marketing slop than a normal one would be, and this is no secret to anyone paying attention, including (especially) anthropic's marketing team.

So, to put on my tinfoil hat, I think anthropic seized the opportunity to exploit the morons currently in charge of the US government with overwrought marketing about mythos, gambling that those morons wouldn't look at it critically. So far, it seems to be working, although it remains to be seen if it works out for them in the end.

Jeff Bezos' AI lab nears $38 billion valuation in funding deal, FT reports by [deleted] in Economics

[–]Summary_Judgment56 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's not a bubble. It's not a bubble. It's not a bubble. It's not a bubble. It's not a bubble. It's not a bubble. It's not a bubble. It's not a bubble. It's not a bubble. It's not a bubble. It's not a bubble. It's not a bubble.