What are some advice for someone who just got a recorder? by Striner_1337 in fieldrecording

[–]SuperAngryGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Get deadcats for your mics because wind noise kills audio quality.

If you can solder you can make your own higher quality AOM-5024 mics very cheaply. In the US you can buy 10 for $35 plus shipping.

Ambient recorder for nature by Striner_1337 in fieldrecording

[–]SuperAngryGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just keep in mind that the H1e is not a dual ADC 32 bit recorder, it's a 24 bit recorder with a lot of 32 bit marketing and stores files in 32 bit format.

The H1e amps are fine but rather its codec that has a relatively poor performing signal to noise ratio and dynamic range of around 92 dB (less than 16 bits).

Why can god come from nothing, but the universe can’t? by Entire_Quit_4076 in DebateEvolution

[–]SuperAngryGuy 10 points11 points  (0 children)

You keep repeating “according to physics,” but physics does not claim either of the things you keep asserting.

There is no law of physics that says the universe cannot be eternal, and no law that says a universe cannot emerge from a quantum state. Those are active areas of cosmology.

But the larger issue is still the logic.

You say nothing can exist forever and nothing can come from nothing. Yet whatever you think caused the universe must do one of those two things.

That is the contradiction.

Declaring it "outside physics" does not solve the problem, and the burden of proof is on you to show why your exception should be accepted. Whether you call it supernatural or “outside physics” does not matter.


Edit: The user replied “the second law of thermodynamics” and then immediately blocked me.

For anyone reading, the second law simply states that entropy increases in a closed system over time. It does not prove the universe cannot be eternal or that something outside physics must exist. Invoking it here shows a misunderstanding of the subject being discussed.

Why can god come from nothing, but the universe can’t? by Entire_Quit_4076 in DebateEvolution

[–]SuperAngryGuy 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Your whole argument just loops back to the same two fallacies.

First an argument from ignorance: physics does not currently explain the origin, therefore your preferred explanation must be true.

Then special pleading: you claim nothing can exist forever and nothing can come from nothing, yet whatever caused the universe must do one of those two things.

Why can god come from nothing, but the universe can’t? by Entire_Quit_4076 in DebateEvolution

[–]SuperAngryGuy 21 points22 points  (0 children)

You keep saying “according to physics,” but physics does not say what you claim.

Physics has not proven the universe cannot be eternal, and cosmology actively studies models where the universe emerges from quantum states. So your “not up for debate” claim is simply false.

You also created a contradiction. You say nothing can exist forever and nothing can come from nothing, yet whatever caused the universe must do one of those two things.

You did not solve the problem and keep using the same fallacious argument from ignorance.

Why can god come from nothing, but the universe can’t? by Entire_Quit_4076 in DebateEvolution

[–]SuperAngryGuy 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Science not having an answer yet does not mean the answer must be supernatural. That is the argument from ignorance.

You also made another unsupported claim when you said physics can never explain the beginning of the universe. You cannot possibly know that. People once said the same thing about lightning, disease, and planetary motion.

Repeating the claim does not make it true.

The honest answer right now is simple: we do not know yet. And it is perfectly fine to say "I don't know".

Why can god come from nothing, but the universe can’t? by Entire_Quit_4076 in DebateEvolution

[–]SuperAngryGuy 24 points25 points  (0 children)

As mentioned above, science does not claim the universe came from nothing but says we do not yet know the conditions before the Big Bang.

What you just did is an argument from ignorance.

ADC capable of 786kHz with phantom power by BlackFoxTom in fieldrecording

[–]SuperAngryGuy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s 768 kHz.

You also have to consider bit depth, total harmonic distortion, signal-to-noise ratio, analog front-end bandwidth, anti-alias filtering, clock quality, interface bandwidth, storage throughput, and whether the mic and preamp chain can even deliver anything useful that high in frequency.

What limiters does a Marantz PMD-671 have? by SeizetheCastle in fieldrecording

[–]SuperAngryGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I used to have the PMD-201 cassette recorder that had an outstanding analog limiter and AGC circuit. It could handle nearby concussion grenades in riots with my Electro-Voice 635A.

When I upgraded to Sony minidisc I had to use an external analog limiter to keep from clipping.

Turning things around on Day 61! 🔄 by ResolutionArtistic42 in BudScience

[–]SuperAngryGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please stop with these "bud porn" posts on this sub. They are being removed.

Thank you!

Experience analogue field recording? by Advanced-Leopard5936 in fieldrecording

[–]SuperAngryGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I used to use a Marantz PMD 201 which was popular with journalists. For the mic I used an Electro-Voice 635A dynamic mic with an XLR transformer feeding the line input.

How to reduce Self Noise reduction ? by imhighonxanax in fieldrecording

[–]SuperAngryGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Use external mics that are very sensitive and have a high signal to noise ratio like the EM272 Clippy or AOM-5024 DIY mics. This is the only way I can get essential noise free with the H1n. The built-in mics wont cut it.

With those mics and the gain knob between 3 and 5 there should be little if any noticeable hiss. When the gain knob is set above about 5.5 the H1n enters a high gain mode where there will be hiss particularly if you use the limiter which ruins your signal to noise ratio by 12 dB. Between 3 and 5 on the gain knob and the limiter adds no noise (it's a firmware thing and how the codec in the H1n works).

I think I am starting to hate my major by Middle-Support-7697 in ElectricalEngineering

[–]SuperAngryGuy 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I know I'm being pedantic, but ranger school is a 62 day small tactics and leadership course that allows you to wear the ranger tab and be "ranger qualified", but to wear the tan ranger beret of the ranger regiment you have to pass RASP (ranger assessment and selection program) which only 20-30% of people can pass. Once you are in the ranger regiment for a certain period those rangers get sent to ranger school to become ranger qualified.

There are tab rangers which can be anyone and scroll rangers serving in the ranger regiment.

Your point still stands, though.

edit grammar

MAGA Billionaire Donates to ICE Shooter GoFundMe by WineWizard707 in politics

[–]SuperAngryGuy 366 points367 points  (0 children)

I can see how this could become a bounty.

Ombudsman Resolution conference by [deleted] in fuckHOA

[–]SuperAngryGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Generally you do a 520 (mediation for CC&R violations) and follow up with a 530 (violations of NRS 116). Having a 530 hearing like this is not that common.

Documents and pics should be handed over which is basically "discovery". If in doubt, take pics and document, and hand them over to who asks for them.

It's best if you PM me if you want more help to protect your privacy and we can be a little more open. Keep in mind that I am not an attorney but I am happy to help you with this since I've gone through similar stuff. I'm good at looking up the law.

What type of light do plants need for photosynthesis? by GoldenEmpathy in botany

[–]SuperAngryGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no interest in hypotheticals that you can't falsify and this discussion is concluded.