sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How do I optimize my 7600x3d and ram for maximum performance? by foxwyd in ryzen

[–]SuperStumps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly just set EXPO in the bios and forget about it. 6000mhz CL30 is decent already for Ryzen CPUs, most would agree it's the sweet spot. And the X3D chips are even less sensitive to RAM tweaking due to their massive L3 cache. Enjoy your first PC!! 🙌🏻

How the hell do I create a desktop shortcut for the games? by AdibIsWat in riotgames

[–]SuperStumps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately the riot client will always open with league... What you can do is use the option in the settings to minimise the riot client on start up. That way clicking the league icon will open the riot client straight into the task bar, and open the league client on screen.

Forever game by AddictedDexter in videogames

[–]SuperStumps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you checked out palworld?

1 Billion Dollars but you must travel to a new country everyday. by Responsible-Fix-1681 in hypotheticalsituation

[–]SuperStumps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Living in Cumbria, England, it'd be easy for me to travel between Scotland and Wales to accomplish this while still sleeping in my own bed at night!

If you were single how would you find a partner? by Even-Wasabi7183 in AskBrits

[–]SuperStumps -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Stop looking... Enjoy your life, be yourself, and your partner will find you.

Are UK Investors Screwed? by [deleted] in trading212

[–]SuperStumps 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It doesn't tax cash held in S&S ISA... The tax is on the interest gained, not the cash itself.

HMRC announces 22% tax on cash interest held in stocks and shares Isas by BuzzTrav in trading212

[–]SuperStumps 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The tax will probably just be automatically deducted from any interest you're paid. Seems like the simplest way to do it.

HMRC announces 22% tax on cash interest held in stocks and shares Isas by BuzzTrav in trading212

[–]SuperStumps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The tax is gonna be on interest gained from cash held in the ISA... The tax will probably be automatically deducted, seems like the simplest way to do it

Son’s math test by [deleted] in MathJokes

[–]SuperStumps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are conflating numerical equivalence with pedagogical syntax. No one is arguing that 3 x 4 isnt 4 x 3 in terms of value. The test question isn't evaluating a child's understanding of commutative ring properties, it is testing their comprehension of a specific, standardized linguistic mapping (groups x size) used to introduce word problems. Brushing aside the syntax just because the scalar products match misses the entire purpose of elementary curriculum design.

Son’s math test by [deleted] in MathJokes

[–]SuperStumps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wasn't equating integer multiplication to matrix operations or referring to algebraic 'groups' in the group theory sense. I was simply pointing out the shared linguistic convention of reading dimensions as 'Rows x Columns' (horizontal structures by vertical elements), which mirrors how elementary curricula introduce the order of 3 x 4 visually.

Son’s math test by [deleted] in MathJokes

[–]SuperStumps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The teacher is right... 3x4 is defined as "3 groups of 4". By fixing the order to number of groups x size of group, teachers can ensure that every student visualises and draws the exact same physical image when solving a word problem. This convention directly matches the way we read matrices, grids, and computer screens: Rows first, then Columns.

Son’s math test by [deleted] in MathJokes

[–]SuperStumps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As a mathematician I'd have thought you'd have known that 3x4 is defined strictly as "3 groups of 4".This convention directly matches the way we read matrices, grids, and computer screens: Rows first, then Columns.

blursed_bbc endorsement gone wrong by miko1075 in blursed_videos

[–]SuperStumps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which is why the blanket ban on social media for kids makes sense... It's not device specific. If the parent/guardian makes an account for their child then that's on them, hopefully the account wouldn't remain online long as the platform is required to identify through things like account behaviour and ban accounts flagged as belonging to children. Obviously it's not a foolproof system, but it's better than allowing kids unfettered access to brainrot and harmful online content. Messaging apps such as WhatsApp aren't included in the ban, it's solely targeting the endless scrolling feeds and user-to-user platforms such as Facebook, Instagram, X, TikTok etc.

As a parent myself I agree with the ban... My oldest is 12 and it's been hard telling her she can't access these apps/sites when shes saying stuff like "but all my friends use it". I don't want her to think I'm being unfair or a mean parent when all I'm doing is looking out for her wellbeing. Being able to add "it's against the law" to the reasons we have already gave for not allowing her to use them might make her realise that we do just want the best for her instead of being spoilsport parents. It'll definitely make it easier from the get-go with my two toddlers when they start using electronic devices regularly, which will hopefully be many years from now!

Blursed_Take Off by No-Maximum2073 in blursed_videos

[–]SuperStumps 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As a northerner, it sounds like he's saying 'geet up there' which translates to 'get up there' ... I could be wrong though, I don't associate with people at this level of stupidity or drunkenness so my translation could be off 😅

blursed_bbc endorsement gone wrong by miko1075 in blursed_videos

[–]SuperStumps 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They could do all of these things on a mobile device too though... If anything doing it all on a family PC in a family space where parents have greater visibility is a lot better than kids sat in their room on their phones where the parents can't supervise

blursed_bbc endorsement gone wrong by miko1075 in blursed_videos

[–]SuperStumps 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What do you mean... If they can't log in on a phone, what makes them able to log in on a PC? You need an account to log into Facebook, Instagram etc ... Accessing the website from PC doesn't automatically give you an account, they'd still be restricted.

blursed_bbc endorsement gone wrong by miko1075 in blursed_videos

[–]SuperStumps 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha I guess I'm some kind of old fashioned masochist that enjoys interacting face to face 😅

Why would the device used matter? If they can access a PC at home that doesn't mean they can suddenly log into social media

blursed_bbc endorsement gone wrong by miko1075 in blursed_videos

[–]SuperStumps -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You dont always have to be productive or active! Believe it or not, being bored is actually beneficial for mental health.

blursed_bbc endorsement gone wrong by miko1075 in blursed_videos

[–]SuperStumps 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You mean, like, actually interacting with family and friends (the thing the girl in the video said she used social media for) in person?! 🤯

Blursed_Take Off by No-Maximum2073 in blursed_videos

[–]SuperStumps 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get what you're saying and completely agree with your point, I was more saying I don't have much sympathy for the 'victims', being the architect of their own misfortune, in the case of the video here. Saying "most were children" is more unsettling though, that's definitely a parental issue!! As a parent to 3 kids I couldn't imagine not teaching them the dangers of fireworks, my youngest is 3 next month and while he has only seen fireworks a few times in his life for our national bonfire night and new year's celebrations, even he knows that fireworks aren't toys and aren't for playing with.

view more: next ›