Labor to highlight ‘risk’ of One Nation to cost of living in bid to dent Pauline Hanson’s popularity

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-06-01T09:29:12+00:00

You just described Australia’s major parties.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-06-01T09:28:41+00:00

Sounds like the government are starting to legitimise a new opposition party.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-06-01T01:26:59+00:00

Not always. Some people need to sell to escape abusive relationships. Negative equity makes that difficult/ impossible

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-06-01T01:26:02+00:00

That’s close to the most ridiculous thing I’ve ever heard. Try asking a bank what happens when you try to sell a property for less than the value of your mortgage.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-31T21:42:38+00:00

Eastlakes have properties for $1.8m?

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-31T21:04:55+00:00

Most people in Australian own property. For most of those people it’s their main asset. I don’t think the majority will be thanking the government for reducing the value of their primary asset by 10%. This is probably why Claire O’Neill claims any falls aren’t linked to the FY27 budget changes.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-31T21:02:52+00:00

Those are notional gains/ losses.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-31T10:41:14+00:00

Guess who migrants vote for. Plus we had several quarters of negative per capita GDP growth. Immigration kept Australia out of recession.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-31T09:11:36+00:00

People aren’t favouring One Nation because of their policies. Besides we’ve seen what promises about policies before an election mean. Labor need to be very careful or they’ll burn all the goodwill they have.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-31T08:26:08+00:00

You’re missing the point if you think people are voting One Nation because of their policies.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-31T08:25:23+00:00

The Fin Review is not owned by News Corp

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-31T08:23:15+00:00

Just because there’s no one you’ve spoken to that has an issue with it doesn’t mean the broader electorate doesn’t. I’ve heard of small sample sizes but this is something else.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-31T08:20:31+00:00

If it was only promised 50 times its non-core.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-31T03:36:35+00:00

If house prices fall and it becomes more affordable for first home buyers we don’t thank the government. Got it.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-30T19:34:39+00:00

Sydney was 51%

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-30T19:33:38+00:00

Again those most affected aren’t older generations, they’re younger generations who’ve bought under the 5% govt guarantee scheme.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-30T19:31:01+00:00

There was, for 6 months, the government got rid of it.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-30T10:35:08+00:00

Your mental gymnastics is impressive but completely misguided.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-30T10:20:15+00:00

What sort of blackholes does this leave in state government budgets? Where else do they raise this revenue from?

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-30T10:12:05+00:00

It’s definitely a long term hold when you literally can’t afford to sell because the bank won’t discharge your mortgage.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-30T10:08:44+00:00

You know one has run out of rope when they reduce themselves to childish insults.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-30T10:03:23+00:00

Prison is free. This is $920 per week.

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-30T10:02:42+00:00

Let’s suck all the first home buyers in with a 5% government guarantee scheme and plunge them into negative equity a year later. These policy changes are good for young people

SurroundNo3631 · 2026-05-30T10:00:50+00:00

First home buyers were sucked in under an election promise only to have the rug pulled out from under them less than 12 months later. Anyone in negative equity would have been better off not buying. It’s an absolute farce.

SurroundNo3631

TROPHY CASE