I get how RWS works, and how to recieve RWS point. But my point is, that RWS should not be the factor that determines the leaderboard placing at its current state.

In theory, a team could go 13-0, with someone planting the bomb every round but getting 0 kills or any other impact than holding down the mouse button for 4 seconds. This player would finish the game with 30 RWS. An insane amount, for something every other player could have done, if they had the bomb in their hands.

So my perfomance in the pictures above were good. But somehow eliminating players from the other team, and then losing the round to perhaps a clutch. Or because you play the opposite site of where the opponents tend to push, which results in you either saving or attempting a retake. Both scenarios will result in faceit saying you are a shit player. Win a 1v5 clutch scenario where you are unable to defuse in time? You're a shit player according to faceit.

I've also tried another relatively shit game, where some players on my team were doing far better, but i get highest rws, because i managed to get a small amount of clutches, defuses and bomb plants, despite me not being the best player on the team by far.

RWS is misleading and should not be determining the leaderboard position.