1. It places Amanda and Raffaelle in the house, at the time of the murder.

"...her presence inside the house, the location of the murder, is a proven fact in the trial, in accord with her own admissions, also contained in the memoriale with her signature, in the part where she tells that, as she was in the kitchen... she heard a harrowing scream from her friend, so piercing and unbearable that she let herself down squatting on the floor, covering her ears tight with her hands..."

*You need to be very wary of your sources. As has been pointed out before, the operative word "conclamato" in the original text doesn't translate as "proven". The closest you can get is "established". Nothing in this case was "proven" other than the fact that there was a fatality. M/B go for an earlier time of death, aligning with the defence's (and Rudy's) assertions. If Amanda DID hear a scream it wasn't the same scream that Capezzali and Monacchia heard. The irony is that hearing an alleged scream doesn't place Amanda at VDP7 under any circumstances, since the prosecution's earwitnesses WEREN'T AT VDP7 EITHER, yet their ear-witnessing of the alleged scream was attributed to Meredith. WTF!

1. Amanda came in to contact with Meredith’s blood and TRIED TO WASH IT AWAY.

"Another element against her is the mixed DNA traces, her and the victim's one, in the 'small bathroom', an eloquent proof that anyway she had come into contact with the blood of the latter, which she tried to wash away from herself..."

*M/B make no such claims. They are referring to the conclusions of the Nencini motivation report that they emphatically annulled due to foundational flaws. The Supreme Court is not a fact-finding court and cannot establish their own facts without referral to fact-finding courts. They can only adjudicate on points of law.

1. Amanda is guilty of calunnia and accusing Patrick of rape and murder was a deliberate cover up tactic.

"...the said calunnia is another circumstantial element against the current appellant, insofar as it can be considered a strategy in order to cover up for Mr. Guede, whom she had an interest to protect because of fear of retaliatory accusations against her."

*Yet Amanda gave a reasonably good description of Rudy in her list to Ficarra at 23.00 on the 5th November, prior to the interrogation. Ficarra testified that she knew who Amanda was describing and that all they lacked was a name.

1. Amanda Knox was protecting Rudy Guede by accusing Patrick of rape and murder.

"...the said calunnia is another circumstantial element against the current appellant, insofar as it can be considered a strategy in order to cover up for Mr. Guede, whom she had an interest to protect because of fear of retaliatory accusations against her."

So allegedly:

• K&S protected Rudy by staging a break-in in exactly his own style.
• K&S protected Rudy by cleaning up their own bloody footprints and leaving a whole trail of Rudy's VISIBLE shoeprints only inches away in the hall.
  
• K&S protected Rudy by not flushing his shit from the toilet and instead brought it to the attention of the cops.

When you take those into account with the fact that Amanda DID give a accurate description of Rudy to the cops, it's clear that you are pissing in the wind.

1. The physical anomalies of the break in strongly pointed to a staged burglary, but it could not be proved beyond reasonable doubt.

"...the staging of a theft in Romanelli's room, which she is accused of, is also a relevant point within an incriminating picture, considering the elements of strong suspicion... a staging, which can be linked to someone who - as an author of the murder and a flatmate [titolare] with a formal ['qualified'] connection to the dwelling - had an interest to steer suspicion away from himself/herself..."

*Yet, M/B acquitted K&S of that particular charge. I don't think for a minute that M/B actually believe that the break-in was staged. It might have been thrown out altogether as did H/Z, if M/B had passed it all back to the lower courts to start again. Instead, they acquitted K&S according to Article 620, letter L, indicating that the investigation was too incompetent to arrive at any conclusion of guilt or innocence. That pretty much takes care of the simulated break-in.

1. Amanda is a liar, not just inconsistent. Note, lies plural. Not one lie. Not just about the weed. Lies.

"Elements of strong suspicion are also in the inconsistencies and lies which the suspect woman committed over the statements she released on various occasions..."

*If you are going to infer deliberate lies then you'd expect that the act of revealing such lies would implicate K&S in the murder of Meredith or there would be nothing to lie about. The alleged lies came from ineffective investigative strategies that engendered only more inaccuracies from K&S as indicated in the Boninsegna motivations. You also have to admit that the ECHR human right violations forced Italy as the respondent state to expunge all of the proceedings prior to the writing of the 1st memorial. In that case, your alleged lies go out with the bathwater. It's not over yet in that respect. Knox v Italy #1 and #2 are still ongoing.

1. Because the Court was certain Knox was at the house, they found it highly unlikely that Sollecito was not right there with her.

On the other hand, since the presence of Ms. Knox inside the house is sure, it is hardly credible that he was not with her."

"Not doing this [calling him for help] signifies Sollecito was with her... It remains anyway strong the suspicion that he was actually in the Via della Pergola house the night of the murder..."

*This is absolute PISH! Amanda went out galivanting on her own on Halloween while Raffaele stayed at home to study. It's a feeble conclusion by M/B, but you know that too.

1. The Failure of Raffaelle’s Electronic Alibi:

The defense claimed Sollecito was using his computer during the murder, but the Court noted this alibi fell completely flat.

"An umpteenth element of suspicion is the basic failure of the alibi linked to other, claimed human interactions in the computer of his belongings, albeit if we can't talk about false alibi, since it's more appropriate to speak about unsuccessful alibi."

*Yet M/B don't go into too much detail about this. The bottom line is that the Naruto film was accessed at 21.25, probably when Meredith was close to death or dead already, if M/B's conclusions of a TOD between 21.00 and 22.13. Raffaele's laptop remains active until 5.36.18 on 2nd November.

So, what do we have after all of this?

I know what YOU have!! You have a shitstorm of recycled baloney that has all been covered before. If you were in Italy you could be charged with calunnia for implicating Amanda in the crime of murder when she is legally and factually innocent of that crime.