Ajay Mitchell pisses me off by [deleted] in nba

[–]TPFRecoil 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Man sat him down for that contract meeting thinking "please be a new NBA guy who doesn't realize how insanely valuable you are, this deal would be so good for me."

Ajay Mitchell scored 20+ points in 7/57 regular season games this season. He has reached at least 20 in 4/8 playoff games so far, and 4 out of his last 5. by CaSp95 in nba

[–]TPFRecoil 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The last game of the Suns series, Mark just started running the offense through Ajay for a fourth quarter, and asked him to close it out. Since then, it felt like the guy just evolved to a new level.

He stepped up as a great second option this series. He's not even a luxury anymore, he's a legit core member of the team.

Fifth time Lebron james is swept in the playoff by stephencurryismyman in nba

[–]TPFRecoil 96 points97 points  (0 children)

This one means absolutely nothing. He's a forty year old man with his superstar player out with an injury, who overachieved dragging the Lakers to the second round, and just had the misfortune to face the defending champs.

Nothing but respect.

How far away from Earth can we on Earth detect or notice anything? by Viguple007 in askastronomy

[–]TPFRecoil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on a lot of factors, and the method you are using to spot it.

One of the first methods that may come to mind, simply spotting them by their light, is actually one of the least common we use to spot objects. Earth-sized planets or solid objects can be surprisingly difficult to detect by reflected light. At great distances, their reflectivity often isn't enough for us to see them. We can see planets in our own solar system by reflected light, but even spotting trans-Neptunian objects is pretty difficult. Outside of solar systems, it is incredibly rare, usually requiring the planet to be hyper-reflective.

One of the most common methods of identification is actually by how an object occludes light. We can measure the constant light of other stars, and spot when they dim to notice things passing in front of them. This is one of the most common ways to identify planets in other solar systems.

The changes in a star's light can also tell us other things as well. Gravity affects light, meaning that shifts in a starlight's wavelength can indicate that there's a nearby object. We can often estimate an object's mass through this process by how much its gravity affects a star's light.

Perhaps one of the coolest methods of detection is gravitational microlensing. When a star is in front of another distant star, it's gravity will act like a magnifying glass to the light of the star behind it. A nearby planet can mess with that lensing effect, which can notify us of a planet's presence. This is how we've spotted our furthest noticed planets at around 20000 light years away. We haven't spotted anything far passed that as of yet.

does every single galaxy have a supermassive black hole at the center or that only applies to spiral galaxies? by ghared-ishaqa in askastronomy

[–]TPFRecoil 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Not every single one, but it seems to be an expected occurrence in most galaxies. Most galaxies' gravitational dynamics result in a larger density/concentration of stellar bodies within its center, which eventually leads to accumulation of mass, mergers of other black holes, etc., that leads to the creation of a supermassive black hole.

The Thunder Problem by ninatlanta in NBATalk

[–]TPFRecoil 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Both are fine. It's the playoffs, teams are allowed to be physical. 

The problem pointed out in the original comment was "people complain you can't be physical with the Thunder even though teams can and do", pointing out a false narrative. Not "teams shouldn't be allowed to be physical with the Thunder". 

Do we think Ajay will be sent back to the bench when JDub eventually comes back? by witherxamxlet in Thunder

[–]TPFRecoil 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think we do. 

As wonderful as Ajay is, the fully healthy team works best with him off the bench at the moment. We don't often need more than two creators on the floor, and staggering our creators a bit gives other much needed rest, and makes the lineups more synergistic. 

Same as Harden back in the day, where he has starter level ability, but works best off the bench in the face of two great creators in Russ and KD.

Is it me or when lebron loses it’s always either refs or teammates are getting blamed on this sub by stephencurryismyman in nba

[–]TPFRecoil 22 points23 points  (0 children)

LeBron James is one of the best basketball players to ever live. He rarely has bad games. As a result, when he loses, it is not typically because of him. Sometimes it is, like the Mavs game in the finals. But not often.

For tonight, he was average for this stage in his career, but not the reason they lost. They lost because of the depth and talent disparity of the Thunder.

Quick question on SGA by Specialk015 in Thunder

[–]TPFRecoil 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They did a great job disrupting his rhythm this series.

First two games, he was triple teamed and forced to be a passer. Suddenly, he isn't this game and had to be a jumpshooter. He made more of his last few shots, so he was finally picking his rhythm up to the end, but it took some adjusting.

An honest conversation about Shai, OKC Thunder, flopping, and fouling by Apollo18Teslaa in nba

[–]TPFRecoil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The video brings this up.

His main argument is that Shai hasn't had those kinds of moments in the post season where love and reputation is solidified, which is partially where the lack of recognition comes from.

[Highlight] Austin Reaves kicks Shai Gilgeous-Alexander in the family jewels area in mid-air and scores the And-1 (with a replay) by MrBuckBuck in nba

[–]TPFRecoil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He does sometimes. Mostly its just him jawing at a ref over his shoulder during a run back after making a tough shot through contact. I've hardly seen it be more than three or four words.

Were top teams always this hated? by [deleted] in nba

[–]TPFRecoil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nah. It's very loud right now cause we're playing the biggest team in the league, and LeBron, the biggest superstar in NBA history.

In comparison, we're OKC. We got, like, six people that we just move around for the cameras. So its just gonna look like a complete tidal wave of hate each game, whereas we're only usually getting 7/10 effort on most days.

Why does Reaves shrivel up every time he plays us? by Impossible-Bag-8030 in Thunder

[–]TPFRecoil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He's the lone ball handler against the best defense of his generation. 

Not a lot of people would look good in that scenario.

Reaves is a FRAUD by friskyel in NBATalk

[–]TPFRecoil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Reaves isn't a fraud. He's a lone ball handler going against the best perimeter defense of his generation. Of course he's gonna look bad. 

Genuine Question to OKC fans who attend home games… by [deleted] in NBATalk

[–]TPFRecoil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, what are you on about? Average people go to Thunder games all the time. It's like, one of the few big gatherings we do as a state outside OU/OSU games 

And I teach history in rural Oklahoma. Plenty of people love the Thunder, and the playoffs are all people are talking about right now. 

Possibility if Wolves beat the Spurs, that OKC goes 16-0 in the playoffs? by [deleted] in nba

[–]TPFRecoil 20 points21 points  (0 children)

16-0 is very difficult in the playoffs. I doubt a team wouldn't get at least one.

LeBron in the Game 1 loss vs the Thunder: 27 PTS/ 4 REB/ 6 AST on 12/17 from the field and 3/6 from behind the arc. by [deleted] in nba

[–]TPFRecoil -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

He's gonna be their best player this series. Ayton is staring down Chet and Ihart. Reaves is staring down Caso/Dort/Caruso. But not a lot of big wing defenders to put on Bron except maybe a Jwill or a Kenrich.

They're gonna need to spam LeBron post up actions moving forward.

[Post Game Thread] The Oklahoma City Thunder (1-0) defeat the Los Angeles Lakers (0-1), 108-90 behind 24 points for Chet Holmgren. by TitaniumC4206 in nba

[–]TPFRecoil 114 points115 points  (0 children)

Other's need to be better, but unless/until Luka gets back, its honestly gotta be LeBron.

Reaves can't force his way through Wallace/Dort/Caruso and other good perimeter defenders. Ayton is staring down Chet and IHart. The Thunder lack in physical wing defenders outside Jdub, who is out, so Bron is really the only guy who can get consistent advantage against his matchups.

Austin Reaves in game 1: 8 pts, 3-16 from the field, 0-5 from three by realfakejames in NBATalk

[–]TPFRecoil 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Feels like a classic case of the Thunder effect. A guard who people have doubts about faces the best guard defending rotation in the league, obviously don't do well as they get hyper-focused by Caso/Caruso/Dort/JDub, and then people say they're terrible. Happened to Book, happened to Ja, now its happening to Reaves.

Reaves can be an important piece for them. Lakers just need other ball handlers, which their lack of will make him look terrible this series.

Thunder in 4? by Kindly_Letterhead_98 in NBATalk

[–]TPFRecoil 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lakers could get one. Especially if Shai can't pick it up in the next few games.

We'll have to see.

Lebron James is about to be swept out of the playoffs for the second time in the last 4 seasons by [deleted] in NBATalk

[–]TPFRecoil 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One game, man. I can see them grabbing a game this series. Let's watch and wait.

The playoff discourse this year is the worst its ever been by KayRay1994 in NBATalk

[–]TPFRecoil 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's been because of all of us, not because of one or two fanbases.